World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
28761
World Ranking
11384
National Ranking
1078

Andrew Judge publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Judge sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 588 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew Judge D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Judge sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Judge is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans various subfields, including Surgery, Rheumatology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, and Emergency Medicine.

Their research topics are concentrated around clinical outcomes and treatments related to orthopaedics and cardiovascular health. Main topics of work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic Implants and Arthroplasty, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Hip and Femur Fractures, Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques, Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew Judge include:

  • Hasan R. Mohammad
  • Michael R. Whitehouse
  • Ashley Blom
  • David W. Murray
  • Gulraj S. Matharu

The scientist has published numerous papers in several key journals, with significant contributions to clinical rheumatology and orthopaedics. Frequent publication venues are:

  • BMJ Open
  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology

Recent papers by Andrew Judge include:

  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (2022), published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (2022), published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for microscopic polyangiitis (2022), published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis (2022), published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (2022), published in Arthritis & Rheumatology

The concentration in high-impact clinical classification criteria indicates an involvement in guidelines and standards within rheumatology and autoimmune vascular diseases. The extensive number of publications and collaboration with multiple researchers suggests a broad engagement within their fields.

Best Publications

  • Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals.

    Nathalie Conrad;Andrew Judge;Andrew Judge;Andrew Judge;Jenny Tran;Hamid Mohseni

  • Incidence and risk factors for clinically diagnosed knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis: influences of age, gender and osteoarthritis affecting other joints

    D Prieto-Alhambra;A Judge;M K Javaid;C Cooper

  • The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study

    Lee E Bayliss;David Culliford;A Paul Monk;Sion Glyn-Jones

  • Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

    Alexander D Liddle;Andrew Judge;Andrew Judge;Hemant Pandit;David W Murray

  • Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial

    David J Beard;Jonathan L Rees;Jonathan A Cook;Ines Rombach

  • Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

    D Culliford;J Maskell;A Judge;C Cooper

  • Models of accelerated sarcopenia: critical pieces for solving the puzzle of age-related muscle atrophy.

    Thomas W. Buford;Stephen D. Anton;Andrew R. Judge;Emanuele Marzetti

  • Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery

    Andy Judge;Nigel K Arden;Cyrus Cooper;M Kassim Javaid

  • Hsp70 overexpression inhibits NF-κB and Foxo3a transcriptional activities and prevents skeletal muscle atrophy

    Sarah M. Senf;Stephen L. Dodd;Joseph Matthew McClung;Andrew R. Judge

  • Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study

    J Leal;A M Gray;D Prieto-Alhambra;D Prieto-Alhambra;D Prieto-Alhambra;N K Arden;N K Arden

  • Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

    A D Liddle;H Pandit;A Judge;D W Murray

  • p38 MAPK links oxidative stress to autophagy-related gene expression in cachectic muscle wasting

    Joseph M. McClung;Andrew R Judge;Scott K. Powers;Zhen Yan;Zhen Yan

  • Use of placebo controls in the evaluation of surgery: systematic review

    K Wartolowska;A Judge;A Judge;S Hopewell;G S Collins

  • 90-day mortality after 409 096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis

    Linda P Hunt;Yoav Ben-Shlomo;Emma M Clark;Paul A Dieppe

  • Oxidative stress and disuse muscle atrophy: cause or consequence?

    Scott K. Powers;Ashley J. Smuder;Andrew R. Judge

  • Inhibition of FoxO transcriptional activity prevents muscle fiber atrophy during cachexia and induces hypertrophy

    Sarah A. Reed;Pooja B. Sandesara;Sarah M. Senf;Andrew R. Judge

  • Mitochondrial defects and oxidative damage in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

    Iraklis I Pipinos;Andrew R. Judge;Zhen Zhu;Joshua T. Selsby

  • The myopathy of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Part 2. Oxidative stress, neuropathy, and shift in muscle fiber type.

    Iraklis I. Pipinos;Andrew R. Judge;Joshua T. Selsby;Zhen Zhu

  • Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

    Alexander D. Liddle;Hemant Pandit;Andrew Judge;David W. Murray

  • FOXO signaling is required for disuse muscle atrophy and is directly regulated by Hsp70.

    Sarah M. Senf;Stephen L. Dodd;Andrew R. Judge

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel K. Arden
Nigel K. Arden University of Oxford
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Andrew Carr
Andrew Carr University of Oxford
David W. Murray
David W. Murray University of Oxford
David J Beard
David J Beard University of Oxford
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Yoav Ben-Shlomo University of Bristol
Paul Dieppe
Paul Dieppe University of Exeter
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford
Raashid Luqmani
Raashid Luqmani University of Oxford
Gary S. Collins
Gary S. Collins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. There are many flexible online degree options in the healthcare field that offer promising career pathways. If you're interested in working in healthcare administration, you might consider a healthcare administration accelerated degree to fast-track your entry into management roles.

For those looking at administrative roles, online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa are ideal for gaining specialized skills quickly while possibly qualifying for financial aid.

Nursing is another high-demand area with alternative and accessible routes. If standardized testing is a concern, you might be surprised to learn that not all programs require entrance exams; do all nursing schools require the teas provides insight into schools that waive the TEAS or HESI exams.

Lastly, for working nurses looking to advance, bridge programs such as adn to np bridge programs offer a direct route from Associate's degree to advanced practice roles, like nurse practitioner.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Judge

Trending Scientists