World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter F. M. Choong

Peter F. M. Choong

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10501 9857 317 310 569 31760

Peter F. M. Choong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter F. M. Choong between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter F. M. Choong published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2020. 17 of the 693 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2020. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

693 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter F. M. Choong: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 3
1995 9
1996 7
1997 8
1998 0
1999 4
2000 11
2001 6
2002 10
2003 7
2004 6
2005 16
2006 20
2007 23
2008 27
2009 31
2010 39
2011 26
2012 24
2013 21
2014 33
2015 19
2016 29
2017 30
2018 32
2019 32
2020 56
2021 47
2022 37
2023 42
2024 18
2025 15
2026 2
Total 693
Download as CSV

Peter F. M. Choong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. M. Choong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 569 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 569
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter F. M. Choong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. M. Choong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Peter F. M. Choong is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Rheumatology, General Health Professions, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic Implants and Arthroplasty, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies, and Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by the scientist are:

  • A practical 3D-printed soft robotic prosthetic hand with multi-articulating capabilities, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Core Recommendations for Osteoarthritis Care: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2023, Arthritis Care & Research
  • Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Risk of Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • The Regulatory Challenge of 3D Bioprinting, 2023, Regenerative Medicine
  • A Monte Carlo simulation-based approach to realistic modelling of additively manufactured lattice structures, 2020, Additive Manufacturing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter F. M. Choong include:

  • Michelle M. Dowsey
  • Samantha Bunzli
  • Tim Spelman
  • Cade Shadbolt
  • Chris Schilling

The scientist has been recognized with the award of Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review.

    Xiaojian Wang;Shanqing Xu;Shiwei Zhou;Wei Xu

  • Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective

    Jan Henkel;Maria A. Woodruff;Devakara R. Epari;Roland Steck

  • Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

    Peter F. Choong;Michelle M. Dowsey;James D. Stoney

  • Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants—Recent Trends in Development of Implant Coatings

    Bill G. X. Zhang;Damian E. Myers;Gordon G. Wallace;Milan Brandt

  • Inconel 625 lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM): Mechanical properties, deformation and failure modes

    Martin Leary;Maciej Mazur;Hugh Williams;Eric Yang

  • Osteosarcoma treatment: state of the art

    Hang T Ta;Crispin R Dass;Peter F. M Choong;Peter F. M Choong;David E Dunstan

  • The Molecular Pathogenesis of Osteosarcoma: A Review

    Matthew L. Broadhead;Jonathan C. M. Clark;Damian E. Myers;Crispin R. Dass

  • Recent developments in liposomes, microparticles and nanoparticles for protein and peptide drug delivery.

    M Tan;Peter F. M Choong;Peter F. M Choong;Crispin R Dass

  • Microbiological Aetiology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Profile of Prosthetic Joint Infections: Are Current Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines Effective?

    Trisha N. Peel;Allen C. Cheng;Allen C. Cheng;Kirsty L. Buising;Peter F. M. Choong

  • Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

    Benjamin Zmistowski;Craig Della Valle;Thomas W. Bauer;Konstantinos N. Malizos

  • Wnt inhibitory factor 1 is epigenetically silenced in human osteosarcoma, and targeted disruption accelerates osteosarcomagenesis in mice

    Maya Kansara;Michael Tsang;Laurent Kodjabachian;Natalie A. Sims

  • Myostatin, insulin‐like growth factor‐1, and leukemia inhibitory factor mRNAs are upregulated in chronic human disuse muscle atrophy

    Katrina A. Reardon;Jonathon Davis;Robert M.I. Kapsa;Peter Choong

  • Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA.

    Michelle M. Dowsey;Michelle M. Dowsey;Peter F. M. Choong;Peter F. M. Choong

  • Obesity is a Major Risk Factor for Prosthetic Infection after Primary Hip Arthroplasty

    Michelle M. Dowsey;Peter F. M. Choong

  • Urokinase Plasminogen Activator System: A Multifunctional Role in Tumor Progression and Metastasis

    Peter F M Choong;Anne P W Nadesapillai

  • A review of clinical and molecular prognostic factors in osteosarcoma

    Jonathan C. M. Clark;Crispin R. Dass;Peter F. M. Choong

  • Clinical pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.

    M. M. Dowsey;M. L. Kilgour;N. M. Santamaria;P. F. M. Choong

  • In situ handheld three‐dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration

    Claudia Di Bella;Claudia Di Bella;Serena Duchi;Cathal D O'Connell;Romane Blanchard

  • Preexisting cognitive impairment is associated with postoperative cognitive dysfunction after hip joint replacement surgery.

    Brendan S Silbert;Lisbeth Anne Evered;David A Scott;Stephen John McMahon

  • RECK--a newly discovered inhibitor of metastasis with prognostic significance in multiple forms of cancer.

    Jonathan C. M. Clark;David M. Thomas;Peter F. M. Choong;Peter F. M. Choong;Crispin R. Dass

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon G. Wallace
Gordon G. Wallace University of Wollongong
Chris Manzie
Chris Manzie University of Melbourne
Michael A. Henderson
Michael A. Henderson Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
David W. P. Thomas
David W. P. Thomas University of Nottingham
Philip Clarke
Philip Clarke University of Oxford
Milan Brandt
Milan Brandt RMIT University
Franklin H. Sim
Franklin H. Sim Mayo Clinic
David J. Castle
David J. Castle University of Tasmania
Anders Rydholm
Anders Rydholm Lund University
Allen C. Cheng
Allen C. Cheng Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine involves more than just becoming a doctor. Students interested in healthcare can also consider rewarding paths in administration, pharmacy, and nursing with convenient online options now available. For those seeking leadership roles, a bachelors in health administration is a flexible entry point that opens doors to hospital management and health services roles.

Advancing further, many professionals pursue a masters in healthcare administration cost-effectively through accredited online programs. These programs balance affordability with skill development in finance, operations, and policy, creating strong pathways to executive positions.

For registered nurses aiming for the highest clinical roles, a 1 year dnp program online offers an accelerated, practice-focused doctorate. This program prepares nurses for leadership in advanced patient care, research, and education.

Pharmacy is another expanding field, and those interested can find the cheapest online pharmacy school pathways. These cost-effective doctoral programs emphasize both pharmaceutical knowledge and patient care — ideal for those passionate about medication management.

With so many online options, students can discover affordable and flexible programs tailored to a variety of healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Peter F. M. Choong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles