World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
28364
World Ranking
13164
National Ranking
542

Jay S. Wunder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Wunder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay S. Wunder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Wunder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay S. Wunder is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery, Oncology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics in medical research, notably Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments, Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas, Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments, Management of metastatic bone disease, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, and Tumors and Oncological Cases.

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • Comparison of Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotic Regimens After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Lower Extremity Bone Tumors, 2022, JAMA Oncology
  • Extrameningeal solitary fibrous tumors-surgery alone or surgery plus perioperative radiotherapy: A retrospective study from the global solitary fibrous tumor initiative in collaboration with the Sarcoma Patients EuroNet, 2020, Cancer
  • Immuno-transcriptomic profiling of extracranial pediatric solid malignancies, 2021, Cell Reports
  • H3.3 G34W Promotes Growth and Impedes Differentiation of Osteoblast-Like Mesenchymal Progenitors in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone, 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • Lineage-defined leiomyosarcoma subtypes emerge years before diagnosis and determine patient survival, 2021, Nature Communications

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter C. Ferguson
  • Anthony M. Griffin
  • Kim M. Tsoi
  • Irene L. Andrulis
  • Nalan Gökgöz

Jay S. Wunder commonly publishes in a number of established venues, such as:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • The Bone & Joint Journal
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial

    Brian O'Sullivan;Aileen M Davis;Robert Turcotte;Robert Turcotte;Robert Bell;Robert Bell

  • Quantitative analysis of MDR1 (multidrug resistance) gene expression in human tumors by polymerase chain reaction.

    K. E. Noonan;C. Beck;T. A. Holzmayer;J. E. Chin

  • Late radiation morbidity following randomization to preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

    Aileen M. Davis;Aileen M. Davis;Brian O'Sullivan;Robert Turcotte;Robert Bell;Robert Bell

  • Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer

    Kevin B. Jacobs;Kevin B. Jacobs;Meredith Yeager;Meredith Yeager;Weiyin Zhou;Weiyin Zhou;Sholom Wacholder

  • EWS-FLI1 fusion transcript structure is an independent determinant of prognosis in Ewing's sarcoma.

    E. De Alava;A. Kawai;J. H. Healey;I. Fligman

  • Treatment of giant-cell tumors of long bones with curettage and bone-grafting.

    H. R. Blackley;J. S. Wunder;A. M. Davis;L. M. White

  • Giant cell tumor of long bone: a Canadian Sarcoma Group study.

    Robert E. Turcotte;Jay S. Wunder;Marc H. Isler;Robert S. Bell

  • Chordoma: long-term follow-up after radical photon irradiation

    Charles Catton;Brian O'Sullivan;Robert Bell;Normand Laperriere

  • Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis

    Dario Callegaro;Rosalba Miceli;Sylvie Bonvalot;Peter Ferguson

  • Histone H3K36 mutations promote sarcomagenesis through altered histone methylation landscape

    Chao Lu;Siddhant U. Jain;Dominik Hoelper;Denise Bechet

  • Predominance of Beta-Catenin Mutations and Beta-Catenin Dysregulation in Sporadic Aggressive Fibromatosis (Desmoid Tumor)

    Sabine Tejpar;Friedel Nollet;Catherine Li;Jay S Wunder

  • Classification of positive margins after resection of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb predicts the risk of local recurrence

    C. H. Gerrand;J. S. Wunder;R. A. Kandel;B. O’Sullivan

  • Residual disease following unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma of an extremity.

    Sabrena Noria;Aileen Davis;Rita Kandel;Jerome Levesque

  • Side population cells isolated from mesenchymal neoplasms have tumor initiating potential.

    Colleen Wu;Qingxia Wei;Velani Utomo;Puviindran Nadesan

  • Function and Health Status Outcomes in a Randomized Trial Comparing Preoperative and Postoperative Radiotherapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

    Aileen M. Davis;B. O'Sullivan;R. S. Bell;R. Turcotte

  • Cartilage tumours and bone development: molecular pathology and possible therapeutic targets

    Judith V. M. G. Bovée;Pancras C. W. Hogendoorn;Jay S. Wunder;Benjamin A. Alman

  • A mutant PTH/PTHrP type I receptor in enchondromatosis

    Sevan Hopyan;Nalan Gokgoz;Raymond Poon;Robert C. Gensure

  • The Histological Response to Chemotherapy as a Predictor of the Oncological Outcome of Operative Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma

    Jay S. Wunder;Gabe Paulian;Andrew G. Huvos;Glenn Heller

  • Phase 2 study of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce wound and combined modality morbidities in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

    Brian O'Sullivan;Anthony M. Griffin;Colleen I. Dickie;Michael B. Sharpe

  • Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer

    Kevin B. Jacobs;Meredith Yeager;Weiyin Zhou;Sholom Wacholder

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian O'Sullivan
Brian O'Sullivan Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Irene L. Andrulis
Irene L. Andrulis University of Toronto
Charles Catton
Charles Catton University of Toronto
Aileen M. Davis
Aileen M. Davis University of Toronto
Benjamin A. Alman
Benjamin A. Alman Duke University
Richard Gorlick
Richard Gorlick The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Adrienne M. Flanagan
Adrienne M. Flanagan University College London
Meredith Yeager
Meredith Yeager Hood College
Sharon A. Savage
Sharon A. Savage National Institutes of Health
Lisa Mirabello
Lisa Mirabello National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a future in healthcare, there are several flexible and affordable online degree pathways that can complement or lead to medical studies in the USA. One popular option is nursing, with many programs tailored for different backgrounds and goals.

If you already have a nursing license and are seeking an advanced degree, you might explore the cheapest dnp online program options. These programs can lead to advanced clinical or leadership roles while keeping education costs manageable.

Those holding an RN license may want to finish their bachelor’s degree through one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, which provide a cost-effective and flexible path to career advancement.

Non-nursing majors who wish to switch careers can benefit from direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online. These accelerated degrees help students with non-nursing backgrounds obtain advanced clinical skills faster.

Finally, students looking for accessible options should review the easiest nursing programs to get into, which may offer lower barriers for entry while still preparing you for a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Jay S. Wunder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles