World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
5430
World Ranking
9303
National Ranking
77

David Golomb publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Golomb sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 71 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David Golomb D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Golomb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Golomb is affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. They have conducted research primarily in the field of Neuroscience, with notable contributions spanning Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Biomedical Engineering, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's research covers various specialized topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies

David Golomb has coauthored several papers with recurring collaborators, such as:

  • David Kleinfeld
  • Fan Wang
  • Jun Takatoh
  • Vincent Prevosto
  • Mingchen Yao

The scientist has published work in multiple prominent venues including Nature, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Neuron, Cell Reports, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Selected recent publications include:

  • "The whisking oscillator circuit", 2022, Nature
  • "Low- and high-level coordination of orofacial motor actions", 2023, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
  • "Theory of hierarchically organized neuronal oscillator dynamics that mediate rodent rhythmic whisking", 2022, Neuron
  • "The spinal premotor network driving scratching flexor and extensor alternation", 2025, Cell Reports
  • "The spinal premotor network driving scratching flexor and extensor alternation", 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Propagating Neuronal Discharges in Neocortical Slices: Computational and Experimental Study

    David Golomb;Yael Amitai

  • Cooperative dynamics in visual processing.

    H. Sompolinsky;H. Sompolinsky;D. Golomb;D. Golomb;D. Kleinfeld

  • The Spatial Dimensions of Electrically Coupled Networks of Interneurons in the Neocortex

    Yael Amitai;Yael Amitai;Jay R. Gibson;Michael Beierlein;Saundra L. Patrick

  • Clustering in globally coupled inhibitory neurons

    David Golomb;John Rinzel

  • Global processing of visual stimuli in a neural network of coupled oscillators.

    H Sompolinsky;D Golomb;D Kleinfeld

  • Synchronization properties of spindle oscillations in a thalamic reticular nucleus model

    D. Golomb;Xiao-Jing Wang;J. Rinzel

  • Dynamics of globally coupled inhibitory neurons with heterogeneity

    David Golomb;John Rinzel

  • Propagation of spindle waves in a thalamic slice model

    David Golomb;Xiao Jing Wang;John Rinzel

  • The Number of Synaptic Inputs and the Synchrony of Large, Sparse Neuronal Networks

    D. Golomb;D. Hansel

  • Electrical Synapses and Synchrony: The Role of Intrinsic Currents

    Benjamin Pfeuty;Germán Mato;David Golomb;David Hansel

  • Contribution of persistent Na+ current and M-type K+ current to somatic bursting in CA1 pyramidal cells: combined experimental and modeling study.

    David Golomb;Cuiyong Yue;Yoel Yaari

  • Emergent spindle oscillations and intermittent burst firing in a thalamic model: specific neuronal mechanisms.

    X J Wang;D Golomb;J Rinzel

  • Mechanisms of firing patterns in fast-spiking cortical interneurons.

    David Golomb;Karnit Donner;Liron Shacham;Dan Shlosberg

  • Muscle architecture in the mystacial pad of the rat.

    Sebastian Haidarliu;Erez Simony;David Golomb;Ehud Ahissar

  • The Combined Effects of Inhibitory and Electrical Synapses in Synchrony

    Benjamin Pfeuty;Germán Mato;David Golomb;David Hansel

  • Continuous and lurching traveling pulses in neuronal networks with delay and spatially decaying connectivity

    David Golomb;G. Bard Ermentrout

  • Willshaw model: Associative memory with sparse coding and low firing rates

    D. Golomb;N. Rubin;H. Sompolinsky

  • How well can we estimate the information carried in neuronal responses from limited samples

    David Golomb;John Hertz;Stefano Panzeri;Alessandro Treves

  • Bistability in Pulse Propagation in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Populations

    David Golomb;G. Bard Ermentrout

  • Tapered whiskers are required for active tactile sensation

    Samuel Andrew Hires;Lorenz Pammer;Lorenz Pammer;Karel Svoboda;David Golomb;David Golomb

  • Models of neuronal transient synchrony during propagation of activity through neocortical circuitry.

    David Golomb

  • Neuronal synchrony measures

    David Golomb

Frequent Co-Authors

John Rinzel
John Rinzel New York University
Ehud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar Weizmann Institute of Science
Haim Sompolinsky
Haim Sompolinsky Hebrew University of Jerusalem
G. Bard Ermentrout
G. Bard Ermentrout University of Pittsburgh
Xiao-Jing Wang
Xiao-Jing Wang New York University
David Kleinfeld
David Kleinfeld University of California, San Diego
Karel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda Allen Institute
Edi Barkai
Edi Barkai University of Haifa
Stefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Michael Brecht
Michael Brecht Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA naturally opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and diverse career pathways in mental health and behavioral sciences. Many students consider masters programs in psychology to deepen their understanding of cognitive processes and human behavior. These programs often provide flexible online coursework, making it easier to balance studies with personal or professional commitments.

For those interested in family dynamics and therapy, an online masters in marriage and family therapy can prepare graduates for licensure and clinical roles in diverse settings. If you are looking for more general options, there are a number of accessible psychology degrees available fully online, making it convenient to start or advance your career.

Furthermore, for those drawn to social work or community health, several msw programs with high acceptance rate provide practical training online. Each of these related pathways supports a rewarding career in promoting mental health, research, and human wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing David Golomb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles