World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Aileen M. Davis

Aileen M. Davis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10439 9801 421 398 386 34497

Aileen M. Davis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aileen M. Davis between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aileen M. Davis published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2013. 24 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2013. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 10 publications
1984 2025

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aileen M. Davis: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 5
1994 9
1995 5
1996 7
1997 8
1998 5
1999 11
2000 8
2001 13
2002 11
2003 11
2004 9
2005 12
2006 15
2007 9
2008 23
2009 21
2010 20
2011 20
2012 14
2013 25
2014 17
2015 21
2016 25
2017 17
2018 9
2019 10
2020 8
2021 14
2022 8
2023 9
2024 14
2025 10
Total 429
Download as CSV

Aileen M. Davis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aileen M. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 386 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 386
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Aileen M. Davis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aileen M. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aileen M. Davis is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Rheumatology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, and Pharmacology. Their research spans topics related to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, HIV-related health complications, and musculoskeletal conditions.

The scientist has contributed extensively to studies on osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms, rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, and musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation. Their publication record includes 130 works in Medicine, with 32 specifically in Rheumatology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Arthritis Care & Research
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Among the scientist's recent papers are:

  • "Immediate outcomes following the GLA:D® program in Denmark, Canada and Australia. A longitudinal analysis including 28,370 patients with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis," 2021, published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • "The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair," 2020, published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Fundamentals of osteoarthritis: outcome evaluation with patient-reported measures and functional tests," 2021, published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • "Developing a short-form version of the HIV Disability Questionnaire (SF-HDQ) for use in clinical practice: a Rasch analysis," 2021, published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • "Examining the impact of a community-based exercise intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular health, strength, flexibility and physical activity among adults living with HIV: A three-phased intervention study," 2021, published in PLoS ONE

They have collaborated frequently with colleagues including Bonnie L. Bermas, Jamie E. Collins, Anthony V. Perruccio, Amr H. Sawalha, and Susan A. Boackle, with multiple coauthored publications.

Best Publications

  • Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?

    Robert B. Bourne;Bert M. Chesworth;Aileen M. Davis;Nizar N. Mahomed

  • Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial

    Brian O'Sullivan;Aileen M Davis;Robert Turcotte;Robert Turcotte;Robert Bell;Robert Bell

  • The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties

    Sara McConnell;Pamela Kolopack;Aileen M. Davis

  • Erratum: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) (American Journal of Industrial Medicine (1996) 29:6 (602-608))

    P. L. Hudak;P. C. Amadio;C. Bombardier;D. Beaton

  • OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis

    Fiona Dobson;Rana Hinman;Ewa Roos;Ewa Roos;J Abbott

  • Late radiation morbidity following randomization to preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

    Aileen M. Davis;Aileen M. Davis;Brian O'Sullivan;Robert Turcotte;Robert Bell;Robert Bell

  • Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

    A. M. Davis;J. G. Wright;J. I. Williams;C. Bombardier

  • Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma : a critical review

    A M Davis;R S Bell;P J Goodwin

  • FRESH OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFTS FOR POST-TRAUMATIC OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS OF THE KNEE

    M. T. Ghazavi;K. P. Pritzker;A. M. Davis;A. E. Gross

  • Treatment of giant-cell tumors of long bones with curettage and bone-grafting.

    H. R. Blackley;J. S. Wunder;A. M. Davis;L. M. White

  • Giant cell tumor of long bone: a Canadian Sarcoma Group study.

    Robert E. Turcotte;Jay S. Wunder;Marc H. Isler;Robert S. Bell

  • Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective database.

    Jacqueline A. Crosby;Charles N. Catton;Aileen Davis;Jean Couture;Jean Couture

  • Responsiveness of the OARSI-OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and function measures.

    M. Bond;A. Davis;Stefan Lohmander;Stefan Lohmander;G. Hawker

  • Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure – an OARSI/OMERACT initiative

    G. A. Hawker;A. M. Davis;M. R. French;J. Cibere

  • Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference?

    Robert B. Bourne;Bert Chesworth;Aileen Davis;Nizar Mahomed

  • Reconstruction of Massive Bone Defects with Allograft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Mohammad T. Ghazavi;I. Stockley;Gilbert Yee;Aileen Davis

  • A longitudinal study to explain the pain-depression link in older adults with osteoarthritis.

    Gillian A. Hawker;Monique A. M. Gignac;Elizabeth Badley;Aileen M. Davis

  • Classification of positive margins after resection of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb predicts the risk of local recurrence

    C. H. Gerrand;J. S. Wunder;R. A. Kandel;B. O’Sullivan

  • Residual disease following unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma of an extremity.

    Sabrena Noria;Aileen Davis;Rita Kandel;Jerome Levesque

  • Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic defects in the knee. A survivorship analysis.

    RJ Beaver;M Mahomed;D Backstein;A Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay S. Wunder
Jay S. Wunder University of Toronto
Brian O'Sullivan
Brian O'Sullivan Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Gillian A. Hawker
Gillian A. Hawker University of Toronto
Nizar N. Mahomed
Nizar N. Mahomed University Health Network
Ewa M. Roos
Ewa M. Roos University of Southern Denmark
Charles Catton
Charles Catton University of Toronto
Allan E. Gross
Allan E. Gross Mount Sinai Hospital
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Emil H. Schemitsch
Emil H. Schemitsch University of Western Ontario
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and specialized career pathways in the healthcare sector. For those interested in management roles rather than direct patient care, a healthcare administration online degree offers comprehensive training in organizational leadership and healthcare operations. These programs are ideal for those looking to move into supervisory or administrative roles within hospitals or clinics.

Nurses seeking to advance their careers can benefit from rn to np programs, which fast-track registered nurses to become nurse practitioners with expanded clinical responsibilities. These bridge programs are commonly available online and designed to fit the schedules of working professionals.

For those passionate about wellness and patient education, an online nutrition degree provides a strong foundation in dietary science and health promotion. Additionally, individuals targeting high-level administrative positions may consider enrolling in cahme-accredited online mha programs to earn a Master of Healthcare Administration recognized for quality and rigor.

Best Scientists Citing Aileen M. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles