World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
47149
World Ranking
9114
National Ranking
353

Joost Dekker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Dekker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 710 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joost Dekker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Dekker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joost Dekker is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and is active in the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Rheumatology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Oncology, Surgery, and General Health Professions. Dekker's research spans across multiple topics related to these areas.

The topics frequently addressed in Dekker's work include:

  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in Dekker's research publications include:

  • Marike van der Leeden
  • M. van der Esch
  • Willem F. Lems
  • Raymond Ostelo
  • Annemarie Braamse

Dean's publications often appear in well-established venues such as:

  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Psycho-Oncology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Dekker include:

  • "Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer-Are We Doing the Right Thing?" (2020), published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • "Clinical management of emotions in patients with cancer: introducing the approach "emotional support and case finding"" (2020), published in Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • "Effects of alpha-glucosidase-inhibiting drugs on acute postprandial glucose and insulin responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021), published in Nutrition and Diabetes
  • "High-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial" (2022), published in Clinical Rehabilitation
  • "Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis" (2023), published in Cancer

Best Publications

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Caroline B. Terwee;Sandra D.M. Bot;Michael R. de Boer;Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

  • The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?

    R. P.S. Van Peppen;Gert Kwakkel;S. Wood-Dauphinee;H. J.M. Hendriks

  • Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: A review of the literature.

    Peter F.M. Verhaak;Jan J. Kerssens;Joost Dekker;Marjolijn J. Sorbi

  • Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review.

    Emmanuel Scheppers;Els van Dongen;Jos Dekker;Jan Geertzen

  • Community based occupational therapy for patients with dementia and their care givers: randomised controlled trial

    Maud J L Graff;Myrra J M Vernooij-Dassen;Marjolein Thijssen;Joost Dekker

  • Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

    Margriet E. Van Baar;Willem J. J. Assendelft;Joost Dekker;Rob A. B. Oostendorp

  • Prevalence of depression and anxiety in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Rosa E. Boeschoten;Rosa E. Boeschoten;Annemarie M.J. Braamse;Annemarie M.J. Braamse;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Pim Cuijpers

  • Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature.

    S.D.M. Bot;C.B. Terwee;D.A.W.M. van der Windt;L.M. Bouter

  • The effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized clinical trial.

    M.E. van Baar;J. Dekker;R.A.B. Oostendorp;D. Bijl

  • Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice

    Sandra D.M. Bot;J. M. Van Der Waal;C. E. Terwee;D. A.W.M. Van Der Windt

  • Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip

    M. P. M. Steultjens;J. Dekker;M. E. van Baar;R. A. B. Oostendorp

  • Comparison of manual therapy and exercise therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized clinical trial.

    Hugo L. Hoeksma;Joost Dekker;H. Karel Ronday;Annet Heering

  • Effects of Community Occupational Therapy on Quality of Life, Mood, and Health Status in Dementia Patients and Their Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Maud J. L. Graff;Myrra J. M. Vernooij-Dassen;Marjolein Thijssen;Joost Dekker

  • Effectiveness of exercise therapy: a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews.

    Nynke Smidt;Henrica C.W. de Vet;Lex M. Bouter;Joost Dekker

  • Pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: the relationship with articular, kinesiological, and psychological characteristics

    M. E. Van Baar;J. Dekker;J. A. M. Lemmens;R. A. B. Oostendorp

  • Effectiveness of exercise in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: nine months' follow up

    M E van Baar;J Dekker;R A B Oostendorp;D Bijl

  • Community occupational therapy for older patients with dementia and their care givers: cost effectiveness study

    Maud J L Graff;Eddy M M Adang;Myrra J M Vernooij-Dassen;Joost Dekker

  • Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review

    Martijn F. Pisters;Cindy Veenhof;Nico L. U. van Meeteren;Raymond W. Ostelo

  • Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients A Systematic Review

    Esther M.J. Steultjens;Joost Dekker;Lex M. Bouter;Jos C.M. van de Nes

  • Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

    Margriet E. Van Baar;Willem J. J. Assendelft;Joost Dekker;Rob A. B. Oostendorp

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem F. Lems
Willem F. Lems Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Giel Nijpels
Giel Nijpels VU University Medical Center
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Caroline B. Terwee
Caroline B. Terwee VU University Medical Center
Robert J. Heine
Robert J. Heine VU University Medical Center
Johannes W. J. Bijlsma
Johannes W. J. Bijlsma Utrecht University
Arja Häkkinen
Arja Häkkinen University of Jyväskylä

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and supplementary qualifications can broaden your medical career options in the USA. Many healthcare professionals are now turning to flexible online programs to upgrade their skills without putting their careers on hold.

If you're a working adult seeking to move into healthcare administration, finding whats the best online mha program for working adults can help balance your learning and professional responsibilities. For nurses wanting to advance, there are best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, making it easier to complete your degree without the need for additional clinical hours.

For those looking to reach the highest levels in nursing practice faster, you can consider the shortest dnp programs online. Cost-conscious students may also be interested in the cheapest dnp programs as a more affordable path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Online healthcare degrees give you the chance to upskill, specialize, or transition into new roles—often on a timeline and budget that works for you.

Best Scientists Citing Joost Dekker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles