World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
32941
World Ranking
16919
National Ranking
636

Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on various subfields including Pharmacology, Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and General Health Professions.

Ostelo's research covers a range of topics, prominently in musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, and health systems including economic evaluations and quality of life assessments. Other key areas of work include meta-analysis and systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines implementation, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, and osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms.

Selected recent publications illustrate the scientist's focus on pain management, physiotherapy, and trial methodology, including:

  • "Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium's international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations" (2024, The Lancet Rheumatology)
  • "The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis" (2021, Physiotherapy)
  • "The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!" (2021, BMC Health Services Research)
  • "Physiotherapy management of sciatica" (2020, Journal of physiotherapy)
  • "Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study" (2022, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy)

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Ostelo include:

  • Johanna M. van Dongen
  • Alessandro Chiarotto
  • Tiziano Innocenti
  • Maurits W. van Tulder
  • J. Knoop

Ostelo has published repeatedly in prominent venues related to musculoskeletal and rehabilitation sciences. These venues include:

  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Journal of physiotherapy
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.

    Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo;Rick A. Deyo;P Stratford;Gordon Waddell

  • Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

    Caroline B. Terwee;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Dirk L. Knol;Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

  • Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain

    Nicholas Henschke;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Maurits W. van Tulder;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

    Steven J Kamper;Steven J Kamper;A T Apeldoorn;A Chiarotto;R J E M Smeets

  • A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain

    Marienke van Middelkoop;Sidney M Rubinstein;Ton Kuijpers;Arianne P Verhagen

  • Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

    Bart W. Koes;Maurits W. Van Tulder;Raymond Ostelo;A. Kim Burton

  • Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

    Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Henrica C.W. de Vet

  • Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change

    Henrica C de Vet;Caroline B Terwee;Raymond W Ostelo;Heleen Beckerman

  • Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

    S.J. Kamper;A.T. Apeldoorn;A. Chiarotto;R.J.E.M. Smeets

  • Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain

    Marienke van Middelkoop;Sidney M. Rubinstein;Arianne P. Verhagen;Raymond W. Ostelo;Raymond W. Ostelo

  • Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain : A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group

    Maurits W. Van Tulder;Raymond Ostelo;T. Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Steven J. Linton

  • Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status

    Steven J. Kamper;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Dirk L. Knol;Christopher G. Maher

  • Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain.

    Bruno T. Saragiotto;Christopher G. Maher;Tiê P. Yamato;Leonardo O.P. Costa

  • Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

    Alessandro Chiarotto;Lara J Maxwell;Raymond W Ostelo;Maarten Boers

  • Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain.

    Jan J. M. Pool;Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo;Jan L. Hoving;Jan L. Hoving;Lex M. Bouter

  • Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review

    Wilco C H Jacobs;Maurits van Tulder;Maurits van Tulder;Mark P. Arts;Sidney M Rubinstein

  • Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach

    Henrica C. W. de Vet;Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo;Caroline B. Terwee;Nicole van der Roer

  • Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

    Nicole van der Roer;Raymond W J G Ostelo;Geertruida E Bekkering;Maurits W van Tulder

  • Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review

    Martijn F. Pisters;Cindy Veenhof;Nico L. U. van Meeteren;Raymond W. Ostelo

  • The Back Pain Beliefs of Health Care Providers: Are We Fear-Avoidant?

    Steven J. Linton;Johan Vlaeyen;Raymond Ostelo

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Arianne P. Verhagen
Arianne P. Verhagen University of Technology Sydney
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Judith E. Bosmans
Judith E. Bosmans Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Caroline B. Terwee
Caroline B. Terwee VU University Medical Center
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if a traditional medical degree is right for you? There are various online degrees and flexible career pathways in the medical field to consider.

For those looking to enter nursing, some adn nursing programs offer a straightforward and accessible entry point. Additionally, some nursing school without teas test eliminates standardized test barriers, making the process less daunting for aspiring nurses.

If you're interested in a non-clinical role, there are reputable online medical coding classes with financial aid. These programs can help you build a career in healthcare administration, billing, or coding without medical school.

For a broader role in the healthcare industry, an online degree in healthcare administration can open doors to leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies. These options provide alternative ways to make a difference in medicine while meeting diverse career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles