World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter O'Sullivan

Peter O'Sullivan

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
29293
World Ranking
12683
National Ranking
414

Peter O'Sullivan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 358 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter O'Sullivan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter O'Sullivan is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation. Their research output spans various aspects of pain management, musculoskeletal conditions, and therapeutic interventions.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Beliefs about the body and pain: the critical role in musculoskeletal pain management, 2020, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
  • Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain (RESTORE): a randomised, controlled, three-arm, parallel group, phase 3, clinical trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Physiotherapists' perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies, 2020, Pain
  • Training of Physical Therapists to Deliver Individualized Biopsychosocial Interventions to Treat Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: A Scoping Review, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • Patient-centred care: the cornerstone for high-value musculoskeletal pain management, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Anne Smith (53 joint publications)
  • Peter Kent (30 joint publications)
  • Amity Campbell (28 joint publications)
  • Kieran O'Sullivan (20 joint publications)
  • J.P. Cañeiro (17 joint publications)

The scientist's publications have appeared predominantly in the following venues:

  • Physical Therapy (7 publications)
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (7 publications)
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (6 publications)
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (5 publications)
  • European Journal of Pain (5 publications)

Peter O'Sullivan's research mainly covers the broad field of Medicine, with subfields including Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main research topics addressed include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of Specific Stabilizing Exercise in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiologic Diagnosis of Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis

    Peter B. O'Sullivan;Grad Dip Manip Phyty;Lance T. Twomey;Garry T. Allison

  • Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism.

    Peter O’Sullivan

  • What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review

    Ivan Lin;Louise Wiles;Rob Waller;Roger Goucke

  • Masterclass. Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management

    P.B. O'Sullivan

  • Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

    K. Vibe Fersum;Peter O'Sullivan;J. Skouen;J. Skouen;Anne Smith

  • The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population.

    Peter B O'Sullivan;Kirsty M Grahamslaw;Michelle Kendell;Shaun C Lapenskie

  • Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population

    Peter B. O’Sullivan;Angus Burnett;Alexander N. Floyd;Kristen Gadsdon

  • Cognitive Functional Therapy: An Integrated Behavioral Approach for the Targeted Management of Disabling Low Back Pain

    Peter B O’Sullivan;J P Caneiro;Mary O’Keeffe;Anne Smith

  • Differences in sitting postures are associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain disorders when patients are subclassified.

    Wim Dankaerts;Peter O'Sullivan;Angus Burnett;Leon Straker

  • Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review

    Aoife Synnott;Mary O'Keeffe;Samantha Bunzli;Wim Dankaerts

  • The influence of different sitting postures on head/neck posture and muscle activity

    Joao Paulo Caneiro;Peter O'Sullivan;Angus Burnett;Avi Barach

  • Effect of different upright sitting postures on spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation in a pain-free population.

    Peter B O'Sullivan;Wim Dankaerts;Angus F Burnett;Garreth T Farrell

  • Altered Abdominal Muscle Recruitment in Patients With Chronic Back Pain Following a Specific Exercise Intervention

    Peter B. O'Sullivan;Lance Twomey;Garry T. Allison

  • Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients

    Wim Dankaerts;Peter Bruce O’Sullivan;Angus Firth Burnett;Leon Melville Straker

  • Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test.

    Peter B O'Sullivan;Darren J Beales;Julie A Beetham;Jillian Cripps

  • It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain

    Peter O'Sullivan

  • The relationship beween posture and back muscle endurance in industrial workers with flexion-related low back pain.

    Peter B. O’Sullivan;Tim Mitchell;Paul Bulich;Rob Waller

  • A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work—1: Neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns

    Grace P.Y. Szeto;Grace P.Y. Szeto;Leon M. Straker;Peter B. O’Sullivan

  • Altered patterns of superficial trunk muscle activation during sitting in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients: importance of subclassification.

    Wim Dankaerts;Peter O'Sullivan;Angus Burnett;Leon Straker

  • Altered patterns of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic low back pain

    Peter O'Sullivan;Lance Twomey;Garry Allison;Jenny Sinclair

Frequent Co-Authors

Leon Straker
Leon Straker Curtin University
Jaro Karppinen
Jaro Karppinen University of Oulu
Clare S. Rees
Clare S. Rees Curtin University
Steven J. Linton
Steven J. Linton Örebro University
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Peter F. M. Choong
Peter F. M. Choong University of Melbourne
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Thomas Graven-Nielsen Aalborg University
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, online nursing and healthcare degrees offer accessible pathways to enter or advance in the field. For nurses with a master’s degree aiming to move quickly into leadership or specialized practice roles, shortest post master's dnp program options help accelerate your progress. Similarly, the shortest dnp program options prioritize efficiency without sacrificing educational quality, ideal for busy professionals seeking career advancement.

Those just starting their journey may consider lpn programs that fast-track entry into nursing with flexible schedules and virtual coursework. For specialized practice in mental health, online options like online psych np programs deliver advanced skills in a growing field with strong demand.

When exploring these pathways, consider factors like accreditation, clinical requirements, length of study, and state licensure. Online healthcare degrees make it easier than ever to tailor your studies to your professional goals while balancing work and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter O'Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles