World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven J. Linton

Steven J. Linton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10334 9700 199 191 336 40165

Steven J. Linton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven J. Linton between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven J. Linton published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2010. 5 of the 373 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2010. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1976 2025

373 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven J. Linton: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 3
1983 3
1984 5
1985 4
1986 4
1987 5
1988 1
1989 4
1990 3
1991 3
1992 3
1993 6
1994 4
1995 3
1996 3
1997 6
1998 12
1999 3
2000 13
2001 10
2002 8
2003 2
2004 3
2005 12
2006 11
2007 10
2008 12
2009 16
2010 28
2011 16
2012 16
2013 16
2014 12
2015 9
2016 23
2017 18
2018 14
2019 12
2020 10
2021 9
2022 6
2023 3
2024 1
2025 4
Total 373
Download as CSV

Steven J. Linton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Linton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 336 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 336
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven J. Linton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Linton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven J. Linton is affiliated with Örebro University in Sweden and specializes in medical research focused on pain and rehabilitation. Their work primarily spans the field of medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as pharmacology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, general health professions, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics of Steven J. Linton's research include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research
  • Pain management and placebo effect
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Workplace health and well-being
  • Pediatric pain management techniques
  • Sleep and related disorders

They have published frequently in notable venues such as:

  • Pain
  • Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  • Physical Therapy
  • The Psychological Record
  • European Journal of Pain

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research interests, including:

  • Training of Physical Therapists to Deliver Individualized Biopsychosocial Interventions to Treat Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • From Boulder to Stockholm in 70 Years: Single Case Experimental Designs in Clinical Research, 2020, The Psychological Record
  • From Fear to Safety: A Roadmap to Recovery From Musculoskeletal Pain, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • My body is not working right: a cognitive behavioral model of body image and chronic pain, 2020, Pain
  • Sleep problems in pain patients entering tertiary pain care: the role of pain-related anxiety, medication use, self-reported diseases, and sleep disorders, 2021, Pain

Steven J. Linton frequently collaborates with various co-authors, including:

  • Ida Flink
  • Peter O'Sullivan
  • Riikka Holopainen
  • Jaro Karppinen
  • Anne Smith

This research network is reflected in their diverse publication record and the interdisciplinary nature of their work on pain and related disorders.

Best Publications

  • Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art

    Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Steven J. Linton

  • The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

    Maaike Leeuw;Mariëlle E. J. B. Goossens;Steven J. Linton;Geert Crombez

  • A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain.

    Steven J. Linton

  • Fear-avoidance model of chronic musculoskeletal pain: 12 years on

    Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Steven J. Linton

  • Impact of Psychological Factors in the Experience of Pain

    Steven J. Linton;William S. Shaw

  • Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain

    S.J. Linton;K. Hallden

  • Early Identification and Management of Psychological Risk Factors (“Yellow Flags”) in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Reappraisal

    Michael K Nicholas;Steven J Linton;Paul J Watson;Chris J Main

  • Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain : A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group

    Maurits W. Van Tulder;Raymond Ostelo;T. Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Steven J. Linton

  • Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

    Steven J Linton;Katja Boersma

  • Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems: what is the evidence?

    S.J. Linton;MW van Tulder

  • Burnout in the working population: relations to psychosocial work factors

    Karin M. Lindblom;Steven J. Linton;Cecilia Fedeli;Ing-Liss Bryngelsson

  • Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain.

    Steven J. Linton;Therese Andersson

  • Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population.

    Nina Buer;Steven J Linton

  • Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness

    Filip K. Arnberg;Steven J. Linton;Monica Hultcrantz;Emelie Heintz

  • Occupational Psychological Factors Increase the Risk for Back Pain: A Systematic Review

    Steven James Linton

  • Development of a short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

    Steven J. Linton;Michael K. Nicholas;Shane MacDonald

  • A population-based study of spinal pain among 35-45-year-old individuals. Prevalence, sick leave, and health care use.

    Steven J. Linton;Anna-Lisa Hellsing;Karin Halldén

  • Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: Risk factors for long-term disability and work loss.

    NA Kendall;SJ Linton;CJ Main;NZ Wellington

  • The Back Pain Beliefs of Health Care Providers: Are We Fear-Avoidant?

    Steven J. Linton;Johan Vlaeyen;Raymond Ostelo

  • Screening to identify patients at risk : profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention

    Katja Boersma;Steven J. Linton

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Jansson-Fröjmark
Markus Jansson-Fröjmark Karolinska Institute
Michael K. Nicholas
Michael K. Nicholas University of Sydney
Chris J. Main
Chris J. Main Keele University
Jaro Karppinen
Jaro Karppinen University of Oulu
Maria Tillfors
Maria Tillfors Karlstad University
Peter O'Sullivan
Peter O'Sullivan Curtin University
Lennart Melin
Lennart Melin Uppsala University
Stephen Morley
Stephen Morley University of Leeds
Madelon L. Peters
Madelon L. Peters Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If studying Medicine in the USA interests you, several alternative online degrees and career pathways are worth considering. Many students choose to pursue nursing or advanced practice roles through online programs designed to save time and reduce costs. For those seeking rapid career advancement, the fastest online dnp programs offer a pathway to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time.

Cost is often a key factor when selecting a program. Options like affordable dnp programs allow students to earn advanced qualifications without incurring significant debt. Alternatively, if you want to quickly enter the workforce, consider fast-track options such as an lpn program—ideal for those who want to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in a short period of time.

Students interested in mental health may benefit from accelerated msn psychiatric np programs. These programs equip you to provide vital mental health support, opening doors to specialized roles. By exploring these online options, you can find flexible pathways that align with your goals and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Linton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles