World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4830
World Ranking
7249
National Ranking
2500

Ryan C. Ewing publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan C. Ewing sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 139 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Ryan C. Ewing D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan C. Ewing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ryan C. Ewing is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics primarily within Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Physics and Astronomy. The scientist's work focuses on several subfields, including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science, Aerospace Engineering, and Geophysics.

Ewing's research emphasizes topics such as Planetary Science and Exploration, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Aeolian processes and effects, Astro and Planetary Science, Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life, Geological formations and processes, and Space Exploration and Technology.

Frequent publication venues for Ewing include:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Nature Communications
  • Earth and Space Science

Among the scientist's recent papers are:

  • A Rock Record of Complex Aeolian Bedforms in a Hesperian Desert Landscape: The Stimson Formation as Exposed in the Murray Buttes, Gale Crater, Mars (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)
  • Complementary classifications of aeolian dunes based on morphology, dynamics, and fluid mechanics (2024, Earth-Science Reviews)
  • An Evolving Understanding of Enigmatic Large Ripples on Mars (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)
  • A distinct ripple-formation regime on Mars revealed by the morphometrics of barchan dunes (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Macroscopic Flow Disequilibrium Over Aeolian Dune Fields (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)

Ewing has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including M. G. A. Lapôtre, Andrew Gunn, M. Nachon, K. Mason, and D. R. Hood, with collaboration counts ranging from 5 to 13 joint works.

Best Publications

  • Deposition, exhumation, and paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale crater, Mars.

    J.P. Grotzinger;S. Gupta;M. C. Malin;D.M. Rubin

  • Aeolian dune field self-organization – implications for the formation of simple versus complex dune-field patterns

    Gary A Kocurek;Ryan C. Ewing

  • Ancient Martian aeolian processes and palaeomorphology reconstructed from the Stimson formation on the lower slope of Aeolis Mons, Gale crater, Mars

    Steven G. Banham;Sanjeev Gupta;David M. Rubin;Jessica A. Watkins

  • Pattern analysis of dune-field parameters

    Ryan C. Ewing;Gary Kocurek;Larry W. Lake

  • White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico: Age, dune dynamics and recent accumulations

    Gary Kocurek;Mary Carr;Ryan Ewing;Karen G. Havholm

  • How do bedform patterns arise? New views on the role of bedform interactions within a set of boundary conditions

    Gary A Kocurek;Ryan C. Ewing;David Mohrig

  • Large wind ripples on Mars: A record of atmospheric evolution

    M. G. A. Lapotre;R. C. Ewing;M. P. Lamb;W. W. Fischer

  • Aeolian dune-field pattern boundary conditions

    R. C. Ewing;Gary A Kocurek

  • Pervasive Aeolian Activity Along Rover Curiosity's Traverse in Gale Crater, Mars

    Simone Silvestro;D.A. Vaz;D.A. Vaz;R.C. Ewing;A.P. Rossi

  • Aeolian dune interactions and dune‐field pattern formation: White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico

    Ryan C. Ewing;Gary A. Kocurek

  • Mineralogy of an active eolian sediment from the Namib dune, Gale crater, Mars

    C. N. Achilles;R. T. Downs;D. W. Ming;E. B. Rampe

  • Internal boundary layer model for the evolution of desert dune fields

    Douglas J. Jerolmack;Ryan C. Ewing;Federico Falcini;Raleigh L. Martin

  • Sedimentary processes of the Bagnold Dunes: Implications for the eolian rock record of Mars

    R. C. Ewing;M. G. A. Lapotre;K. W. Lewis;M. Day

  • Development of spatially diverse and complex dune‐field patterns: Gran Desierto Dune Field, Sonora, Mexico

    Carrie Beveridge;Gary A Kocurek;Ryan C. Ewing;Nicholas Lancaster

  • Barchan‐parabolic dune pattern transition from vegetation stability threshold

    Meredith D. Reitz;Douglas J. Jerolmack;Ryan C. Ewing;Raleigh L. Martin

  • Wind‐blown sandstones cemented by sulfate and clay minerals in Gale Crater, Mars

    R. E. Milliken;Ryan C. Ewing;W. W. Fischer;J. Hurowitz

  • Sand dune movement in the Victoria Valley, Antarctica

    Mary C. Bourke;Mary C. Bourke;Ryan C. Ewing;David Finnegan;Hamish A. McGowan

  • Martian Aeolian Activity at the Bagnold Dunes, Gale Crater: The View from the Surface and Orbit

    N. T. Bridges;N. T. Bridges;R. Sullivan;C. E. Newman;S. Navarro

  • Dune field pattern formation and recent transporting winds in the Olympia Undae Dune Field, north polar region of Mars

    Ryan C. Ewing;Ryan C. Ewing;Aymeric Pierre B. Peyret;Gary A Kocurek;Mary Bourke;Mary Bourke

  • Origin of a complex and spatially diverse dune-field pattern, Algodones, southeastern California

    Dana Derickson;Gary Kocurek;Ryan C. Ewing;Charlie Bristow

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Lamb
Michael P. Lamb California Institute of Technology
Kevin W. Lewis
Kevin W. Lewis Johns Hopkins University
Gary Kocurek
Gary Kocurek The University of Texas at Austin
Douglas J. Jerolmack
Douglas J. Jerolmack University of Pennsylvania
Nathan T. Bridges
Nathan T. Bridges Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
David M. Rubin
David M. Rubin University of California, Santa Cruz
Sanjeev Gupta
Sanjeev Gupta Imperial College London
Woodward W. Fischer
Woodward W. Fischer California Institute of Technology
John P. Grotzinger
John P. Grotzinger California Institute of Technology
Claire E. Newman
Claire E. Newman University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, online degrees offer flexible opportunities to deepen knowledge or pivot careers. While Earth Science programs are specialized, exploring related fields can broaden career prospects. For example, language skills are increasingly valuable, especially in global research or environmental communication. Veterans might find the best military friendly online spanish degrees a practical choice to complement their science expertise.

Creative fields like environmental storytelling or scientific visualization also benefit from advanced training. Pursuing online MFA programs can enhance skills in art and media, crucial for raising awareness about climate and earth-related issues.

Leadership roles in environmental organizations or companies may require strong management abilities. Professionals can pursue the best online human resource management masters degree to gain expertise in managing teams and projects effectively in scientific settings.

Additionally, seniors looking to upskill or change careers benefit from tailored educational opportunities. Many institutions offer one year degrees for seniors, helping mature learners complete relevant qualifications quickly and conveniently.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan C. Ewing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles