World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
89676
World Ranking
7772
National Ranking
4050

J. Thomas Bigger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Thomas Bigger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 336 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

J. Thomas Bigger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Thomas Bigger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Thomas Bigger is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work addresses the intersection of cardiac health and mental health, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to understanding how these areas influence each other.

The research output includes a paper titled Design and baseline data from the vanguard of the Comparison of Depression Interventions after Acute Coronary Syndrome (CODIACS) randomized controlled trial, published in 2020 through UNC Libraries. This publication provides foundational data on a clinical trial examining depression interventions following acute coronary events.

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers across various related specialties. Notable co-authors include:

  • William Whang
  • Matthew M. Burg
  • Robert M. Carney
  • Kenneth E. Freedland
  • Diane Catellier

These collaborations suggest a network involving experts in both cardiovascular medicine and psychological aspects of health, aligning with the scientist's main topics of study.

Their publications are concentrated in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

This indicates a presence in academic repositories with an emphasis on clinical trials and health intervention research.

Main topics frequently explored by J. Thomas Bigger include:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health

The combination of these topics reflects a research trajectory that considers both physiological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease management and patient outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

    Marek Malik;J. Thomas Bigger;A. John Camm;Robert E. Kleiger

  • Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes

    Hertzel C Gerstein;Michael E Miller;Robert P Byington

  • Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats

    Gary G. Berntson;J. Thomas Bigger;Dwain L. Eckberg;Paul Grossman

  • Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    C. Cushman;Gregory W. Evans;Robert P. Byington;Jeffrey A. Cutler

  • Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Henry N. Ginsberg;Laura C. Lovato;Lawrence A. Leiter;Peter Linz

  • Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction

    Maria Teresa La Rovere;J Thomas Bigger;Frank I Marcus;Andrea Mortara

  • Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction

    Roger Lester;Arthur J. Moss;J. Thomas Bigger;Robert B. Case

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: Endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • Sertraline Treatment of Major Depression in Patients With Acute MI or Unstable Angina

    Alexander H. Glassman;Christopher M. O'Connor;Robert M. Califf;Karl Swedberg

  • Heart Rate Variability: Measurement and Clinical Utility

    Robert E. Kleiger;Phyllis K. Stein;J. Thomas Bigger

  • Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction

    Georg Schmidt;Marek Malik;Petra Barthel;Raphael Schneider

  • Long-Term Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes

    Hertzel C. Gerstein;Michael E. Miller;Saul Genuth;Faramarz Ismail-Beigi

  • Antipsychotic drugs : Prolonged QTc interval, torsade de pointes, and sudden death

    Alexander H. Glassman;J. Thomas Bigger

  • Baroreflex Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability in the Identification of Patients at Risk for Life-Threatening Arrhythmias Implications for Clinical Trials

    Maria Teresa La Rovere;Gian Domenico Pinna;Stefan H. Hohnloser;Frank I. Marcus

  • Comparison of Paroxetine and Nortriptyline in Depressed Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

    Steven P. Roose;Fouzia Laghrissi-Thode;John S. Kennedy;J. Craig Nelson

  • Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability two weeks after acute myocardial infarction.

    J.Thomas Bigger;J.Thomas Bigger;Joseph L. Fleiss;Joseph L. Fleiss;Richard C. Steinman;Richard C. Steinman;Linda M. Rolnitzky;Linda M. Rolnitzky

  • Stability over time of variables measuring heart rate variability in normal subjects

    Robert E. Kleiger;Robert E. Kleiger;Robert E. Kleiger;J.Thomas Bigger;J.Thomas Bigger;J.Thomas Bigger;Matthew S. Bosner;Matthew S. Bosner;Matthew S. Bosner;Mina K. Chung;Mina K. Chung;Mina K. Chung

  • Power law behavior of RR-interval variability in healthy middle-aged persons, patients with recent acute myocardial infarction, and patients with heart transplants

    J. T. Bigger;R. C. Steinman;L. M. Rolnitzky;J. L. Fleiss

  • Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Distinguishes Between Patients Likely and Patients Not Likely to Benefit From Implanted Cardiac Defibrillator Therapy A Solution to the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II Conundrum

    Daniel M. Bloomfield;Richard C. Steinman;Pearila B. Namerow;Michael Parides

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease: Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander H. Glassman
Alexander H. Glassman Columbia University
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University
Arthur J. Moss
Arthur J. Moss University of Rochester Medical Center
Sana M. Al-Khatib
Sana M. Al-Khatib Duke University
Kerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee Duke University
Alfred E. Buxton
Alfred E. Buxton Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gust H. Bardy
Gust H. Bardy University of Washington
Alan H. Kadish
Alan H. Kadish Touro College
Peter J. Schwartz
Peter J. Schwartz Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related fields that can be pursued through online education. For those eager to lead or manage within healthcare, a health care administration online degree offers foundational knowledge in healthcare policy, management, and leadership. If you are looking for advanced leadership roles, you might consider one of the cheapest mha programs to earn a Master of Healthcare Administration while balancing work and studies.

Nursing professionals seeking career advancement often look for seamless transition programs such as accredited msn to dnp programs online. These programs help experienced nurses achieve the highest level of clinical education and expand their impact on patient care. Meanwhile, those interested in pharmacy can explore flexible online pharmacy programs that provide a pathway to advanced practice and pharmaceutical research.

Choosing an online pathway can offer affordability and convenience without compromising the quality of education. These degrees provide alternative career options within the healthcare sector, making it possible to find a path that fits your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing J. Thomas Bigger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles