World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
151
Citations
107903
World Ranking
1103
National Ranking
635

Daniel B. Mark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Mark sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 715 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel B. Mark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Mark sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 151 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Distinguished Fellowship Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Daniel B. Mark is affiliated with Duke University in the United States, primarily contributing to the field of Medicine with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans several interconnected subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work frequently appears in leading publication venues such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Journal, JAMA Cardiology, and Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. This publication record reflects a robust presence in cardiovascular research communities.

Key topics covered in their studies include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

The scientist has collaborated extensively with notable coauthors, including:

  • David J. Maron
  • Judith S. Hochman
  • Gregg W. Stone
  • John A. Spertus
  • Harmony R. Reynolds

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines," 2023, Circulation
  • "Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure," 2021, Circulation
  • "Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine

In addition to articles, Daniel B. Mark has contributed to book publications, including "The Nature of Law" published in 2024 by University of Notre Dame Press eBooks.

The scientist has been recognized with professional awards such as the Distinguished Fellowship Award from the American College of Cardiology in 2009 and is a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS

    Frank E. Harrell;Kerry L. Lee;Daniel B. Mark

  • Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive Heart failure

    Gust H. Bardy;Kerry L. Lee;Daniel B. Mark;Jeanne E. Poole

  • ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Function after Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.

    M F Newman;J L Kirchner;B Phillips-Bute;V Gaver

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: Endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index)

    Mark A. Hlatky;Robin E. Boineau;Michael B. Higginbotham;Kerry L. Lee

  • ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker

  • Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure.

    Jeanne E. Poole;George W. Johnson;Anne S. Hellkamp;Jill Anderson

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for exercise testing : Executive summary : A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;John W. Beasley;Faafp

  • Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease

    Pamela S. Douglas;Udo Hoffmann;Manesh R. Patel;Daniel B. Mark

  • Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial

    Douglas L. Packer;Daniel B. Mark;Richard A. Robb;Kristi H. Monahan

  • Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation

    Eric L. Eisenstein;Kevin J. Anstrom;David F. Kong;Linda K. Shaw

  • Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.

    Judith S. Hochman;Gervasio A. Lamas;Christopher E. Buller;Vladimir Dzavik

  • Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

    Daniel B. Mark;Linda Shaw;Frank E. Harrell;Mark A. Hlatky

  • American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

    Christopher P Cannon;Alexander Battler;Ralph G Brindis;Jafna L Cox

  • Depression and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease *

    John C Barefoot;Michael J Helms;Daniel B Mark;James A Blumenthal

  • Depression as a risk factor for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery.

    James A Blumenthal;Heather S Lett;Michael A Babyak;William White

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease: Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee Duke University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University
Kevin J. Anstrom
Kevin J. Anstrom Duke University
Gust H. Bardy
Gust H. Bardy University of Washington
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Udo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann Harvard University
Frank E. Harrell
Frank E. Harrell Vanderbilt University
Sana M. Al-Khatib
Sana M. Al-Khatib Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the field of Medicine but seeking alternative study routes, there are several accessible online degrees and career pathways to consider. Aspiring nurses, for instance, can start their journey with the cheapest online rn to bsn programs, which are perfect for registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications affordably.

For non-nurses eager to enter the profession, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer an accelerated path to a master's in nursing – ideal for those with a bachelor’s degree in another field.

Those looking to reach the pinnacle of nursing education should explore the cheapest phd nursing programs, which make earning a doctorate-level credential more achievable both financially and logistically.

If admissions competitiveness is a concern, several nursing schools with high acceptance rates can provide a more accessible route to the nursing profession. These options allow flexibility for various backgrounds and career goals within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel B. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles