World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2524 2310 9 9 336 13306

Susanne S. Pedersen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susanne S. Pedersen between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susanne S. Pedersen published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2019. 23 of the 665 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2019. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 13 publications
1973 2025

665 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susanne S. Pedersen: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 4
1978 1
1979 4
1980 4
1981 5
1982 5
1983 7
1984 2
1985 6
1986 8
1987 7
1988 6
1989 10
1990 9
1991 2
1992 5
1993 4
1994 9
1995 2
1996 7
1997 3
1998 8
1999 1
2000 7
2001 8
2002 8
2003 9
2004 10
2005 12
2006 19
2007 23
2008 28
2009 38
2010 31
2011 32
2012 21
2013 27
2014 32
2015 21
2016 26
2017 23
2018 20
2019 40
2020 30
2021 22
2022 15
2023 19
2024 10
2025 13
Total 665
Download as CSV

Susanne S. Pedersen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne S. Pedersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 336 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 336
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Susanne S. Pedersen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne S. Pedersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Susanne S. Pedersen is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark and has a significant publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work encompasses related subfields including General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Epidemiology.

The researcher's main topics of work include:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

Susanne S. Pedersen has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • EP Europace
  • European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
  • General Hospital Psychiatry
  • European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jens Brock Johansen
  • Søren J. Skovbakke
  • Christina Maar Andersen
  • Charlotte Helmark
  • Jens Cosedis Nielsen

Selected recent publications showcase the scope of their research interests and include:

  • Associations of loneliness and social isolation with physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults (2021), published in Perspectives in Public Health
  • Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Chronic Disease Outcomes (2020), published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • How to optimize the adherence to a guideline-directed medical therapy in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (2022), published in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (2023), published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial (2021), published in EP Europace

Best Publications

  • Type D personality, cardiac events, and impaired quality of life : a review

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Johan Denollet

  • Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.

    Pier D Lambiase;Craig Barr;Dominic A M J Theuns;Reinoud Knops

  • Usefulness of type D personality in predicting five-year cardiac events above and beyond concurrent symptoms of stress in patients with coronary heart disease.

    Johan Denollet;Susanne S. Pedersen;Christiaan J. Vrints;Viviane M. Conraads

  • Psychosocial aspects in cardiac rehabilitation: From theory to practice. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation of the European Society of Cardiology

    Nana Pogosova;Hugo Saner;Susanne S Pedersen;Margaret E Cupples

  • Type D personality is associated with increased anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and their partners.

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Ron T van Domburg;Dominic A M J Theuns;Luc Jordaens

  • Social inhibition modulates the effect of negative emotions on cardiac prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era

    Johan Denollet;Susanne S. Pedersen;Andrew T.L. Ong;Ruud A.M. Erdman

  • Validity of the Type D personality construct in Danish post-MI patients and healthy controls.

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Johan Denollet

  • Health status as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of current evidence

    Paula M.C. Mommersteeg;Johan Denollet;John A. Spertus;Susanne S. Pedersen

  • Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Chronic Disease Outcomes

    Julie Christiansen;Rikke Lund;Pamela Qualter;Christina Maar Andersen

  • Psychosocial perspectives in cardiovascular disease.

    Susanne S Pedersen;Susanne S Pedersen;Roland von Känel;Phillip J Tully;Phillip J Tully;Johan Denollet

  • Is Type D Personality Here to Stay? Emerging Evidence Across Cardiovascular Disease Patient Groups

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Johan Denollet

  • Type D personality predicts death or myocardial infarction after bare metal stent or sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: A rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at rotterdam cardiology hospital (RESEARCH) registry substudy

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Susanne S. Pedersen;Pedro A. Lemos;Priya R. van Vooren;Tommy K.K. Liu

  • Following family or friends. Social norms in adolescent healthy eating.

    Susanne Pedersen;Alice Grønhøj;John Thøgersen

  • Concerns about the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a determinant of anxiety and depressive symptoms independent of experienced shocks.

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Susanne S. Pedersen;Ron T. van Domburg;Dominic A.M.J. Theuns;Luc Jordaens

  • The distressed (type D) personality is independently associated with impaired health status and increased depressive symptoms in chronic heart failure.

    Angélique A. Schiffer;Susanne S. Pedersen;Jos W. Widdershoven;Eric H. Hendriks

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in the wake of heart disease: prevalence, risk factors, and future research directions.

    Helle Spindler;Susanne S. Pedersen

  • Assessment of the type D personality construct in the Korean population: a validation study of the Korean DS14.

    Hong Euy Lim;Moon Soo Lee;Young Hoon Ko;Young Min Park

  • The Crisis Support Scale: Psychometric qualities and further validation.

    Ask Elklit;Susanne Schmidt Pedersen;Lise Jind

  • Type-D personality is a stable taxonomy in post-MI patients over an 18-month period.

    Elisabeth J. Martens;Nina Kupper;Susanne S. Pedersen;Annelies E. Aquarius

  • Cardiac tachyarrhythmias and patient values and preferences for their management : The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLEACE)

    Deirdre A. Lane;Luis Aguinaga;Carina Blomström-Lundqvist;Giuseppe Boriani

  • Increased vital exhaustion among type-D patients with ischemic heart disease

    Susanne Schmidt Pedersen;Berrie Middel

  • Cross-cultural analysis of Type D (distressed) personality in 6222 patients with ischemic heart disease: A study from the International HeartQoL Project

    Nina Kupper;Susanne S. Pedersen;Stefan Höfer;Hugo Saner

  • Psychological intervention following implantation of an implantable defibrillator: a review and future recommendations.

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Krista C. Van Den Broek;Samuel F. Sears

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Nina Kupper
Nina Kupper Tilburg University
Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Jens Cosedis Nielsen Aarhus University Hospital
Samuel F. Sears
Samuel F. Sears East Carolina University
Peter de Jonge
Peter de Jonge University of Groningen
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Phillip J. Tully
Phillip J. Tully University of Adelaide
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online learning opportunities and specialized career paths. Many students consider becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role that requires specific education and certification. It's important to note that requirements can vary across different cities and states within the USA.

For example, Scottsdale bcba education requirements highlight the need for graduate-level coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, those interested in working in Washington State can review the bcba certification requirements in Seattle and explore specific steps for becoming a bcba in Spokane. Opportunities in the Midwest are also robust, and it's essential to look into bcba certification requirements in St. Louis for city-specific pathways.

Exploring these links can help you plan your educational journey, compare local licensing requirements, and identify online degrees that align with your psychology career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Susanne S. Pedersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles