World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6387 5943 3464 3144 111 9588

David S. DeGarmo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David S. DeGarmo between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David S. DeGarmo published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2010. 6 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2010. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

119 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David S. DeGarmo: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 4
1998 0
1999 4
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 5
2005 5
2006 3
2007 5
2008 3
2009 5
2010 7
2011 5
2012 3
2013 6
2014 4
2015 3
2016 4
2017 6
2018 6
2019 6
2020 6
2021 7
2022 6
2023 1
2024 3
2025 5
2026 1
Total 119
Download as CSV

David S. DeGarmo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. DeGarmo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David S. DeGarmo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. DeGarmo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David S. DeGarmo is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences, psychology, and health professions, with a significant focus on clinical psychology and general health professions. This work intersects with areas such as sociology and political science, safety research, and demography.

The academic output of David S. DeGarmo includes contributions to topics related to child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, food security and health in diverse populations, racial and ethnic identity research, COVID-19 and mental health, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, disability education and employment, and family and disability support research.

Key publication venues where DeGarmo has frequently published include Prevention Science, Development and Psychopathology, American Journal of Public Health, Journal of Family Psychology, and Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Within these venues, their work often appears alongside a network of frequent coauthors including Leslie D. Leve, Elizabeth L. Budd, Camille C. Cioffi, Stephanie De Anda, and Ellen Hawley McWhirter, reflecting collaborative research efforts.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by DeGarmo are:

  • Effectiveness of a COVID-19 Testing Outreach Intervention for Latinx Communities, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Using Motivational Interviewing to Improve Parenting Skills and Prevent Problem Behavior During the Transition to Kindergarten, 2020, Prevention Science
  • A Longitudinal Investigation of Discrimination and Mental Health in Chinese International Students: The Role of Social Connectedness, 2020, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Paths 2 the Future: Evidence for the Efficacy of a Career Development Intervention for Young Women With Disabilities, 2020, Exceptional Children
  • A Culturally Adapted Parenting Intervention for Mexican-Origin Immigrant Families with Adolescents: Integrating Science, Culture, and a Focus on Immigration-Related Adversity, 2021, Prevention Science

Best Publications

  • Parenting through change: An effective prevention program for single mothers.

    Marion S. Forgatch;David S. DeGarmo

  • Promoting Academic Success among Latino Youths.

    Charles R. Martinez;David S. DeGarmo;J. Mark Eddy

  • Evaluating fidelity: predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training.

    Marion S. Forgatch;Gerald R. Patterson;David S. DeGarmo

  • Posttraumatic stress symptoms among National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq: associations with parenting behaviors and couple adjustment.

    Abigail H. Gewirtz;Melissa A. Polusny;David S. DeGarmo;Anna Khaylis

  • A Culturally Informed Model of Academic Well-Being for Latino Youth: The Importance of Discriminatory Experiences and Social Support.

    David S. DeGarmo;Charles R. Martinez

  • How do outcomes in a specified parent training intervention maintain or wane over time

    David S. DeGarmo;Gerald R. Patterson;Marion S. Forgatch

  • Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Girls in the Juvenile Justice System: 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Patricia Chamberlain;Leslie D. Leve;David S. DeGarmo

  • Cascading effects following intervention.

    Gerald R. Patterson;Marion S. Forgatch;David S. DeGarmo

  • Parenting of divorced mothers as a link between social status and boys' academic outcomes: unpacking the effects of socioeconomic status.

    David S. DeGarmo;Marion S. Forgatch;Charles R. Martinez

  • Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study.

    Marion S. Forgatch;Gerald R. Patterson;David S. Degarmo;Zintars G. Beldavs

  • Hyperactive and antisocial behaviors: Comorbid or two points in the same process?

    Gerald R. Patterson;David S. Degarmo;Nancy Knutson

  • Helping military families through the deployment process: Strategies to support parenting.

    Abigail H. Gewirtz;Christopher R. Erbes;Melissa A. Polusny;Marion S. Forgatch

  • Child Maltreatment and Foster Care: Unpacking the Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Parental Substance Use

    Dana K. Smith;Amber B. Johnson;Katherine C. Pears;Philip A. Fisher

  • Systematic changes in families following prevention trials.

    Gerald R. Patterson;David DeGarmo;Marion S. Forgatch

  • Care neglect, supervisory neglect, and harsh parenting in the development of children's aggression: a replication and extension.

    John F. Knutson;David DeGarmo;Gina Koeppl;John B. Reid

  • Social disadvantage and neglectful parenting as precursors to the development of antisocial and aggressive child behavior: Testing a theoretical model

    John F. Knutson;David S. DeGarmo;John B. Reid

  • Evaluating Mediators of the Impact of the Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT) Multimodal Preventive Intervention on Substance Use Initiation and Growth across Adolescence

    David S. DeGarmo;J. Mark Eddy;John B. Reid;Rebecca A. Fetrow

  • An efficacious theory-based intervention for stepfamilies.

    Marion S. Forgatch;David S. DeGarmo;Zintars G Beldavs

  • Parenting, Parental Mental Health, and Child Functioning in Families Residing in Supportive Housing

    Abigail H. Gewirtz;David S. DeGarmo;Elizabeth J. Plowman;Gerald August

  • Early development of delinquency within divorced families: evaluating a randomized preventive intervention trial.

    David S. DeGarmo;Marion S. Forgatch

  • Ethnicity, Culture, and Sexual Aggression: Risk and Protective Factors.

    Gordon C. Nagayama Hall;Andra L. Teten;David S. DeGarmo;Stanley Sue

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion S. Forgatch
Marion S. Forgatch University of Oregon
Abigail H. Gewirtz
Abigail H. Gewirtz University of Minnesota
Gerald R. Patterson
Gerald R. Patterson Ball State University
Leslie D. Leve
Leslie D. Leve University of Oregon
Philip A. Fisher
Philip A. Fisher Stanford University
Elizabeth A. Stormshak
Elizabeth A. Stormshak University of Oregon
James J. Snyder
James J. Snyder Wichita State University
John B. Reid
John B. Reid University of Oregon
Melissa A. Polusny
Melissa A. Polusny University of Minnesota
Patricia Chamberlain
Patricia Chamberlain University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology programs in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility for working professionals and allow students nationwide to access high-quality education.

Students can compare top psychology programs in USA to find institutions with outstanding faculty, research facilities, and student support services. Location-based rankings are also available; for instance, if you’re in Virginia, the best psychology degree rankings in Virginia can help you explore in-state options. Residents in specific cities may be interested in the top psychology programs in Virginia Beach, while those in Texas can refer to the best psychology degree programs ranking in Waco.

Career pathways for psychology graduates include clinical psychology, counseling, industrial-organizational psychology, research, education, and more. Earning an online degree from a reputed program can help position graduates for licensure, graduate study, or entry-level roles in diverse settings. Explore your options to find the right fit for your goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing David S. DeGarmo

Trending Scientists