World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
8472
World Ranking
8730
National Ranking
150

Peter Schwabe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Schwabe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 104 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Schwabe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Schwabe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Schwabe is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has a research focus primarily in computer science. Their work encompasses several subfields including artificial intelligence, information systems, computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and signal processing.

Schwabe's contributions span key topics such as cryptographic implementations and security, cryptography and data security, security and verification in computing, chaos-based image and signal encryption, advanced malware detection techniques, security in wireless sensor networks, and cryptography and residue arithmetic.

Their recent publications include:

  • "They're not that hard to mitigate": What Cryptographic Library Developers Think About Timing Attacks (2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP))
  • Post Quantum Noise (2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
  • X-Wing (2024, IACR Communications in Cryptology)
  • Optimizations and Practicality of High-Security CSIDH (2024, IACR Communications in Cryptology)
  • Formally verifying Kyber (2023, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems)

Frequent co-authors in Schwabe's research include Gilles Barthe, Manuel Barbosa, Benjamin Grégoire, Vincent Laporte, and Tiago Oliveira.

They have published extensively in venues such as IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, IACR Communications in Cryptology, the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, and HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).

Best Publications

  • CRYSTALS - Kyber: A CCA-Secure Module-Lattice-Based KEM

    Joppe Bos;Leo Ducas;Eike Kiltz;T Lepoint

  • Post-quantum key exchange: a new hope

    Erdem Alkim;Léo Ducas;Thomas Pöppelmann;Peter Schwabe

  • High-speed high-security signatures

    DJ Daniel Bernstein;N Niels Duif;T Tanja Lange;P Peter Schwabe

  • CRYSTALS-Dilithium: A lattice-based digital signature scheme

    Léo Ducas;Eike Kiltz;Tancrède Lepoint;Vadim Lyubashevsky

  • SPHINCS: Practical Stateless Hash-Based Signatures

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Daniel J. Bernstein;Daira Hopwood;Andreas Hülsing;Tanja Lange

  • The security impact of a new cryptographic library

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Tanja Lange;Peter Schwabe

  • Faster and Timing-Attack Resistant AES-GCM

    Emilia Käsper;Peter Schwabe

  • The SPHINCS+ Signature Framework

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Andreas Hülsing;Stefan Kölbl;Ruben Niederhagen

  • McBits: fast constant-time code-based cryptography

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Tung Chou;Peter Schwabe

  • High-speed high-security signatures

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Niels Duif;Tanja Lange;Peter Schwabe

  • New AES Software Speed Records

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Peter Schwabe

  • Post-Quantum TLS Without Handshake Signatures

    Peter Schwabe;Douglas Stebila;Thom Wiggers

  • High-speed Curve25519 on 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit microcontrollers.

    Michael Düll;Björn Haase;Gesine Hinterwälder;Michael Hutter

  • New software speed records for cryptographic pairings

    Michael Naehrig;Ruben Niederhagen;Peter Schwabe

  • CRYSTALS – Dilithium: Digital Signatures from Module Lattices

    Léo Ducas;Tancrède Lepoint;Vadim Lyubashevsky;Peter Schwabe

  • NEON crypto

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Peter Schwabe

  • Gimli : A Cross-Platform Permutation

    Daniel J. Bernstein;Stefan Kölbl;Stefan Lucks;Pedro Maat Costa Massolino

  • NewHope without reconciliation.

    Erdem Alkim;Léo Ducas;Thomas Pöppelmann;Peter Schwabe

  • High-Speed Key Encapsulation from NTRU

    AT Andreas Hülsing;J Rijneveld;John Schanck;P Peter Schwabe

  • NaCl on 8-Bit AVR Microcontrollers

    M. Hutter;P. Schwabe

  • From 5-Pass $$\mathcal {MQ}$$-Based Identification to $$\mathcal {MQ}$$-Based Signatures

    Ming-Shing Chen;Andreas Hülsing;Joost Rijneveld;Simona Samardjiska

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Bernstein
Daniel J. Bernstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Tanja Lange
Tanja Lange Eindhoven University of Technology
Bo-Yin Yang
Bo-Yin Yang Academia Sinica
Christof Paar
Christof Paar Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Léo Ducas
Léo Ducas Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Lejla Batina
Lejla Batina Radboud University
Damien Stehlé
Damien Stehlé École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Vadim Lyubashevsky
Vadim Lyubashevsky IBM (Switzerland)
Eike Kiltz
Eike Kiltz Ruhr University Bochum
Tim Güneysu
Tim Güneysu Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring computer science students have many flexible options to boost their skills and job prospects through online education. Some choose certificate programs that pay well to gain practical knowledge quickly and stand out in the competitive tech job market. These targeted credentials can be completed fast and often lead to higher-paying entry-level roles.

For those looking to build advanced expertise, exploring the quickest online masters degree programs allows working professionals to climb the career ladder without a long time commitment. Many of the most worthwhile masters degrees are available online, focusing on high-demand areas like artificial intelligence, data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering.

Alternatively, beginners or those changing careers may want to start with associates degrees online, which offer foundational training and a pathway to further education. No matter your background or goals, flexible online learning opens the door to rewarding technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Schwabe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles