World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dieter H. Pahr

Dieter H. Pahr

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
43
Citations
6088
World Ranking
6288
National Ranking
23

Dieter H. Pahr publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter H. Pahr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 178 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Dieter H. Pahr D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter H. Pahr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter H. Pahr is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and focuses their research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively in the areas of Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Oral Surgery, and Epidemiology. Their work spans several main topics including orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, bone health and osteoporosis research, elasticity and material modeling, hip disorders and treatments, bone fractures and treatments, dental implant techniques and outcomes, and anatomy and medical technology.

Frequent publication venues for Dieter H. Pahr include the Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials with 13 publications, Scientific Reports with 5 publications, Medical Engineering & Physics with 4 publications, Bone Reports with 3 publications, and Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine also with 3 publications.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Andreas Reisinger (32 joint publications), Alexander Synek (29), Martin Frank (13), Christopher J. Dunmore (7), and Matthew M. Skinner (7).

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Dieter H. Pahr include:

  • A Review on Recent Advances in the Constitutive Modeling of Bone Tissue, 2020, Current Osteoporosis Reports
  • The position of Australopithecus sediba within fossil hominin hand use diversity, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Quantifying tactile properties of liver tissue, silicone elastomers, and a 3D printed polymer for manufacturing realistic organ models, 2020, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
  • Evidence for habitual climbing in a Pleistocene hominin in South Africa, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Development of a Multi-Material 3D Printer for Functional Anatomic Models, 2021, International Journal of Bioprinting

Best Publications

  • Experimental investigation of a novel hybrid metal–composite joining technology

    S. Ucsnik;M. Scheerer;S. Zaremba;D.H. Pahr

  • A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro

    E. Dall'Ara;B. Luisier;R. Schmidt;F. Kainberger

  • Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.

    Yan Chevalier;Dieter Pahr;Helga Allmer;Mathieu Charlebois

  • QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

    E. Dall’Ara;D. Pahr;P. Varga;F. Kainberger

  • Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength

    Philippe K Zysset;Enrico Dall'Ara;Peter Varga;Dieter H Pahr

  • Human-like hand use in Australopithecus africanus

    Matthew M. Skinner;Nicholas B. Stephens;Zewdi J. Tsegai;Alexandra C. Foote

  • Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone

    Dieter H. Pahr;Philippe K. Zysset

  • TBS reflects trabecular microarchitecture in premenopausal women and men with idiopathic osteoporosis and low-traumatic fractures

    Christian Muschitz;Roland Kocijan;Judith Haschka;Dieter Pahr

  • A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies.

    Dieter H. Pahr;Philippe K. Zysset

  • A nonlinear finite element model validation study based on a novel experimental technique for inducing anterior wedge-shape fractures in human vertebral bodies in vitro.

    E. Dall'Ara;R. Schmidt;D. Pahr;P. Varga

  • Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study

    Yan Chevalier;Dieter Pahr;Mathieu Charlebois;Paul Heini

  • Trabecular bone structure correlates with hand posture and use in hominoids

    Zewdi J. Tsegai;Tracy L. Kivell;Thomas Gross;Huynh Nhu Nguyen

  • From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework

    Dieter H. Pahr;Philippe K. Zysset

  • Synchrotron X-ray phase nano-tomography-based analysis of the lacunar-canalicular network morphology and its relation to the strains experienced by osteocytes in situ as predicted by case-specific finite element analysis.

    Peter Varga;Bernhard Hesse;Bernhard Hesse;Max Langer;Max Langer;Susanne Schrof

  • Improvements in Vertebral Body Strength Under Teriparatide Treatment Assessed In Vivo by Finite Element Analysis: Results From the EUROFORS Study†‡

    Christian Graeff;Yan Chevalier;Mathieu Charlebois;Peter Varga

  • From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework

    Unknown

  • Validation of an anatomy specific finite element model of Colles' fracture

    Peter Varga;Sebastian Baumbach;Dieter Pahr;Philippe K. Zysset

  • A patient-specific finite element methodology to predict damage accumulation in vertebral bodies under axial compression, sagittal flexion and combined loads.

    Yan Chevalier;Mathieu Charlebois;Dieter Pahr;Peter Varga

  • HR-pQCT based FE analysis of the most distal radius section provides an improved prediction of Colles' fracture load in vitro

    Peter Varga;Dieter H. Pahr;Sebastian Baumbach;Philippe K. Zysset

  • Rotational stability in screw-fixed scaphoid fractures compared to plate-fixed scaphoid fractures

    Josef Jurkowitsch;E. Dall’Ara;S. Quadlbauer;Ch. Pezzei

  • Principal stiffness orientation and degree of anisotropy of human osteons based on nanoindentation in three distinct planes.

    Andreas G. Reisinger;Dieter H. Pahr;Philippe K. Zysset

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe K. Zysset
Philippe K. Zysset University of Bern
Matthew M. Skinner
Matthew M. Skinner Max Planck Society
Jean-Jacques Hublin
Jean-Jacques Hublin Collège de France
Guillaume Haiat
Guillaume Haiat Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Pascal Laugier
Pascal Laugier Sorbonne University
Hans-Joachim Wilke
Hans-Joachim Wilke University of Ulm
Marcus G. Pandy
Marcus G. Pandy University of Melbourne
Marco Viceconti
Marco Viceconti University of Bologna
Graham M. Treece
Graham M. Treece University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Engineering and Technology education is rapidly evolving, with a growing number of online sports management degree programs available to meet diverse interests and career goals. These programs offer flexibility for working professionals and recent graduates alike, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Luckily, there are options like the cheapest online masters in urban planning which help minimize education costs while still delivering quality instruction and recognized credentials.

For those in search of accelerated advancement, a master degree in 6 months can offer a streamlined path to higher qualifications. These programs are designed to fast-track your career without the lengthy time commitment of traditional graduate degrees.

If you’re seeking quick credentials for immediate employment or career shifts, consider 6-month certificate programs that pay well. These certificates target in-demand skills and fast-growing sectors, providing a strong return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter H. Pahr

Trending Scientists