World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15190 14288 807 777 406 23951

Klaus Engelke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Klaus Engelke between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Klaus Engelke published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2009. 26 of the 452 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2009. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 45 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 15 publications
1986 2025

452 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Klaus Engelke: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 7
1990 1
1991 4
1992 8
1993 9
1994 3
1995 5
1996 5
1997 6
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 9
2005 6
2006 9
2007 4
2008 15
2009 45
2010 16
2011 15
2012 14
2013 27
2014 30
2015 19
2016 20
2017 22
2018 12
2019 13
2020 22
2021 19
2022 20
2023 16
2024 11
2025 15
Total 452
Download as CSV

Klaus Engelke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Engelke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 406 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 406
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Klaus Engelke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Engelke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Klaus Engelke is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant number of publications related to orthopedics and sports medicine, physiology, surgery, biomedical engineering, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's main research topics include bone health and osteoporosis research, hip and femur fractures, nutrition and health in aging, body composition measurement techniques, bone and joint diseases, medical imaging techniques and applications, and hip disorders and treatments.

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Hip and femur fractures
  • Nutrition and health in aging
  • Body composition measurement techniques
  • Bone and joint diseases
  • Medical imaging techniques and applications
  • Hip disorders and treatments

Their recent papers cover a range of studies published in various journals during 2020. These include:

  • "Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography," 2020, Osteoporosis International
  • "Opportunistic Screening Using Low-Dose CT and the Prevalence of Osteoporosis in China: A Nationwide, Multicenter Study," 2020, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • "Interactions between Muscle and Bone-Where Physics Meets Biology," 2020, Biomolecules
  • "Effects of High-Intensity Resistance Training on Osteopenia and Sarcopenia Parameters in Older Men with Osteosarcopenia-One-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled Franconian Osteopenia and Sarcopenia Trial (FrOST)," 2020, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • "Muscle Density, but Not Size, Correlates Well With Muscle Strength and Physical Performance," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Engelke frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Bone Reports
  • Osteologie/Osteology
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • Bone
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology

Frequent collaborators include Oliver Chaudry, Wolfgang Kemmler, Michael Uder, Glen M. Blake, and Xiaoguang Cheng. The number of joint publications with these coauthors ranges from 13 to 27.

Best Publications

  • Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism

    John P. Bilezikian;Roger Bouillon;Thomas Clemens;Juliet Compston

  • Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art.

    Harry K. Genant;Klaus Engelke;Thomas Fuerst;Claus-C. Glüer

  • Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

    Klaus Engelke;Judith E. Adams;Gabriele Armbrecht;Peter Augat

  • Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard

    Fanny Buckinx;Francesco Landi;Matteo Cesari;Roger A. Fielding

  • Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review.

    Charlotte Beaudart;Charlotte Beaudart;A. Dawson;S. C. Shaw;Nicholas C. Harvey

  • Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    Bente L Langdahl;Cesar Libanati;Daria B Crittenden;Michael A Bolognese

  • A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data

    Yan Kang;K. Engelke;W.A. Kalender

  • Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants

    Emeka Nkenke;Michael Hahn;Konstanze Weinzierl;Martin Radespiel-Tröger

  • Bone loss before the clinical onset of rheumatoid arthritis in subjects with anticitrullinated protein antibodies

    Arnd Kleyer;Stephanie Finzel;Jürgen Rech;Bernhard Manger

  • Benefits of 2 Years of Intense Exercise on Bone Density, Physical Fitness, and Blood Lipids in Early Postmenopausal Osteopenic Women Results of the Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study (EFOPS)

    Wolfgang Kemmler;Dirk Lauber;Jürgen Weineck;Johannes Hensen

  • Advanced CT bone imaging in osteoporosis

    H. K. Genant;K. Engelke;S. Prevrhal

  • Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density : the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters

    Sven Prevrhal;Klaus Engelke;Willi A Kalender

  • Executive Summary of the 2015 ISCD Position Development Conference on Advanced Measures From DXA and QCT: Fracture Prediction Beyond BMD

    John A. Shepherd;John T. Schousboe;Susan B. Broy;Klaus Engelke

  • Exercise maintains bone density at spine and hip EFOPS: a 3-year longitudinal study in early postmenopausal women.

    K. Engelke;W. Kemmler;D. Lauber;C. Beeskow

  • Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women

    S. V. Stengel;W. Kemmler;R. Pintag;C. Beeskow

  • Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone

    V. Bousson;A. Le Le Bras;F. Roqueplan;Y. Kang

  • Regulatory T Cells Protect from Local and Systemic Bone Destruction in Arthritis

    Mario M. Zaiss;Benjamin Frey;Andreas Hess;Jochen Zwerina

  • Effects of whole body vibration on bone mineral density and falls: results of the randomized controlled ELVIS study with postmenopausal women

    S. von Stengel;W. Kemmler;K. Engelke;W. A. Kalender

  • A hierarchical 3D segmentation method and the definition of vertebral body coordinate systems for QCT of the lumbar spine

    André Mastmeyer;Klaus Engelke;Christina Fuchs;Willi A. Kalender

Frequent Co-Authors

Willi A. Kalender
Willi A. Kalender University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Georg Schett
Georg Schett University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Sharmila Majumdar
Sharmila Majumdar University of California, San Francisco
Tony M. Keaveny
Tony M. Keaveny University of California, Berkeley
Jacques P. Brown
Jacques P. Brown Université Laval
Philippe K. Zysset
Philippe K. Zysset University of Bern
Mary L. Bouxsein
Mary L. Bouxsein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Marjolein Visser
Marjolein Visser Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring pathways related to studying Medicine in the USA but prefer flexible, online learning, there are a range of affordable programs to consider. Many healthcare positions, such as advanced practice nursing, pharmacy, and health information management, can be pursued through accredited online degrees. For example, those interested in nursing leadership roles might explore the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs, which provide a streamlined path from a Bachelor of Science in Nursing to a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Aspiring pharmacists can also benefit from online pharmacy programs that cover vital topics, including drug safety, patient care, and medication management, in a flexible online format. If your interest lies in the administrative side of healthcare, health information technology programs online teach key skills for managing patient data and healthcare records.

Additionally, for those wanting to begin a career quickly, medical billing and coding online courses cost far less than traditional programs and can lead to entry-level positions in a booming healthcare sector. These online degrees and courses offer flexibility, affordability, and open doors to diverse medical careers beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Engelke

Trending Scientists