World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
84
Citations
26669
World Ranking
418
National Ranking
144

Tony M. Keaveny publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony M. Keaveny sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 217 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Tony M. Keaveny D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony M. Keaveny sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Tony M. Keaveny is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specialized emphasis on orthopedics and sports medicine, surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, and biomedical engineering. The scope of their work covers topics related to bone health and osteoporosis research, hip and femur fractures, bone and joint diseases, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, bone health and treatments, bone fractures and treatments, and medical imaging and analysis.

Their frequent publication venues include the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Osteoporosis International, JBMR Plus, The Spine Journal, and Bone. Below are examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Tony M. Keaveny:

  • Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis, 2020, Osteoporosis International
  • Romosozumab improves lumbar spine bone mass and bone strength parameters relative to alendronate in postmenopausal women: results from the Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH) trial, 2021, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • Bone density and strength from thoracic and lumbar CT scans both predict incident vertebral fractures independently of fracture location, 2020, Osteoporosis International
  • Increased risks of vertebral fracture and reoperation in primary spinal fusion patients who test positive for osteoporosis by Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis, 2022, The Spine Journal
  • Load-transfer in the human vertebral body following lumbar total disc arthroplasty: Effects of implant size and stiffness in axial compression and forward flexion, 2020, JOR Spine

Frequently collaborating with Tony M. Keaveny are researchers David C. Lee, Mary Bouxsein, David L. Kopperdahl, Daniel D. Bikle, and Janet M. Chiang.

Throughout their career, Tony M. Keaveny has been involved in research that addresses the biomechanical properties of bones, the clinical assessment of osteoporosis, and factors influencing fracture risk, particularly in the spine. Their work integrates medical imaging techniques with clinical outcomes to assess bone strength and fracture risk.

Tony M. Keaveny received the Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) award in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site

    Elise F. Morgan;Harun H. Bayraktar;Tony M. Keaveny

  • Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

    Harun H. Bayraktar;Elise F. Morgan;Glen L. Niebur;Grayson E. Morris

  • Biomechanics of trabecular bone.

    Tony M. Keaveny;Elise F. Morgan;Glen L. Niebur;Oscar C. Yeh

  • Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty.

    Michael A. K. Liebschner;William S. Rosenberg;Tony M. Keaveny

  • A view of the parallel computing landscape

    Krste Asanovic;Rastislav Bodik;James Demmel;Tony Keaveny

  • Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site

    Elise F Morgan;Tony M Keaveny;Tony M Keaveny

  • Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone

    David L Kopperdahl;Tony M Keaveny;Tony M Keaveny

  • Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

    R.Paul Crawford;R.Paul Crawford;Christopher E. Cann;Tony M. Keaveny;Tony M. Keaveny

  • High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone

    Glen L Niebur;Michael J Feldstein;Jonathan C Yuen;Tony J Chen

  • Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone

    T M Keaveny;T P Pinilla;R P Crawford;D L Kopperdahl

  • Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus

    Tony M. Keaveny;Edward F. Wachtel;Edward F. Wachtel;Catherine M. Ford;Catherine M. Ford;Wilson C. Hayes;Wilson C. Hayes

  • A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

    Tony M. Keaveny;Wilson C. Hayes

  • A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

    C.J. Hernandez;T.M. Keaveny

  • Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains

    Tony M. Keaveny;Tony M. Keaveny;X.Edward Guo;Edward F. Wachtel;Edward F. Wachtel;Thomas A. McMahon

  • Effect of Testosterone Treatment on Volumetric Bone Density and Strength in Older Men With Low Testosterone: A Controlled Clinical Trial

    Peter J. Snyder;David L. Kopperdahl;Alisa J. Stephens-Shields;Susan S. Ellenberg

  • Cortical and trabecular load sharing in the human vertebral body.

    Senthil K Eswaran;Atul Gupta;Mark F Adams;Tony M Keaveny

  • Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone

    David L Kopperdahl;Elise F Morgan;Tony M Keaveny

  • Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

    Eric S. Orwoll;Lynn M. Marshall;Carrie M. Nielson;Steven R. Cummings

  • Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate

    M.J. Silva;C. Wang;T.M. Keaveny;W.C. Hayes

  • Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans.

    David L Kopperdahl;Thor Aspelund;Paul F Hoffmann;Sigurdur Sigurdsson

  • Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body.

    Matthew J. Silva;Tony M. Keaveny;Wilson C. Hayes

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary L. Bouxsein
Mary L. Bouxsein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Wilson C. Hayes
Wilson C. Hayes Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Klaus Engelke
Klaus Engelke University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Sundeep Khosla
Sundeep Khosla Mayo Clinic
Eric S. Orwoll
Eric S. Orwoll Oregon Health & Science University
Jacques P. Brown
Jacques P. Brown Université Laval
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Glen L. Niebur
Glen L. Niebur University of Notre Dame
Kristine E. Ensrud
Kristine E. Ensrud University of Minnesota
Jane A. Cauley
Jane A. Cauley University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tony M. Keaveny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles