World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 41 6865 6627 1873 1737 112 8192

Glen L. Niebur publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Glen L. Niebur between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Glen L. Niebur published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2008. 7 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications 2026: 4 publications
1993 2026

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Glen L. Niebur: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 4
1995 1
1996 4
1997 4
1998 2
1999 5
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 7
2005 2
2006 5
2007 3
2008 9
2009 4
2010 7
2011 7
2012 6
2013 6
2014 5
2015 8
2016 5
2017 7
2018 2
2019 4
2020 3
2021 2
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 3
2026 4
Total 133
Download as CSV

Glen L. Niebur publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen L. Niebur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369 112
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Glen L. Niebur D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen L. Niebur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362 41
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Glen L. Niebur is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research spans the interdisciplinary fields of Medicine and Engineering, with particular focus on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Cell Biology, Mechanical Engineering, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Bone fractures and treatments
  • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

Recent publications by Glen L. Niebur provide insight into their research focus and contributions across different areas:

  • Mechanical stimuli and matrix properties modulate cancer spheroid growth in three-dimensional gelatin culture, 2020, Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Effect of defects on the constant-amplitude fatigue behavior of as-built Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion process: Assessing performance with metallographic analysis and micromechanical simulations, 2022, Additive manufacturing
  • Integration of mechanics and biology in computer simulation of bone remodeling, 2021, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • The effect of marrow secretome and culture environment on the rate of metastatic breast cancer cell migration in two and three dimensions, 2021, Molecular Biology of the Cell
  • Controlled mechanical loading affects the osteocyte transcriptome in porcine trabecular bone in situ, 2024, Bone

Glen L. Niebur frequently collaborates with several researchers:

  • Alyssa G. Oberman
  • Kimberly J. Curtis
  • Laoise M. McNamara
  • Meghana Machireddy
  • Lucas Debiase

Their work has been published in diverse venues reflecting interdisciplinary applications, including:

  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Additive manufacturing
  • Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • Bone
  • Molecular Biology of the Cell

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

    Harun H. Bayraktar;Elise F. Morgan;Glen L. Niebur;Grayson E. Morris

  • Biomechanics of trabecular bone.

    Tony M. Keaveny;Elise F. Morgan;Glen L. Niebur;Oscar C. Yeh

  • Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is regulated by osteocyte and osteoblast cells in a simplified bone niche.

    Evelyn Birmingham;G.L. Niebur;Peter E. McHugh;G. Shaw

  • High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone

    Glen L Niebur;Michael J Feldstein;Jonathan C Yuen;Tony J Chen

  • Roles of deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in shoulder elevation

    J Liu;RE Hughes;WP Smutz;G Niebur

  • Hydroxyapatite reinforced collagen scaffolds with improved architecture and mechanical properties.

    Robert J. Kane;Holly E. Weiss-Bilka;Matthew J. Meagher;Yongxing Liu

  • Convergence behavior of high-resolution finite element models of trabecular bone

    G. L. Niebur;J. C. Yuen;A. C. Hsia;T. M. Keaveny

  • The relevance of the moment arm of shoulder muscles with respect to axial rotation of the glenohumeral joint in four positions.

    David K. Kuechle;Stephen R. Newman;Eiji Itoi;Glen L. Niebur

  • Topology Optimization Using a Hybrid Cellular Automaton Method With Local Control Rules

    Andrés Tovar;Neal M. Patel;Glen L. Niebur;Mihir Sen

  • MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE OF THE THUMB MUSCLES

    W. Paul Smutz;Apichai Kongsayreepong;Richard E. Hughes;Glen Niebur

  • Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone

    Michael J. Jaasma;Harun H. Bayraktar;Glen L. Niebur;Tony M. Keaveny

  • Mechanical property determination of bone through nano- and micro-indentation testing and finite element simulation.

    Jingzhou Zhang;Glen L. Niebur;Timothy C. Ovaert

  • Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.

    Xiangyi Liu;Glen L. Niebur

  • Comparison of two methods for computing abduction moment arms of the rotator cuff

    Richard E. Hughes;Glen Niebur;Jain Liu;Kai Nan An

  • Characterization of cancellous and cortical bone strain in the in vivo mouse tibial loading model using microCT-based finite element analysis.

    Haisheng Yang;Kent D. Butz;Daniel Duffy;Glen L. Niebur

  • Fluid shear stress in trabecular bone marrow due to low-magnitude high-frequency vibration

    Thomas R. Coughlin;Glen L. Niebur

  • Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography

    Xiang Wang;Daniel B. Masse;Huijie Leng;Kevin P. Hess

  • The effect of holding time on nanoindentation measurements of creep in bone.

    Ziheng Wu;Tyler A. Baker;Timothy C. Ovaert;Glen L. Niebur

  • Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone

    Xiutao Shi;X. Sherry Liu;Xiang Wang;X. Edward Guo

  • Viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone tissue depend on gender and elastic modulus.

    Ziheng Wu;Timothy C. Ovaert;Glen L. Niebur

  • Microdamage propagation in trabecular bone due to changes in loading mode.

    Xiang Wang;Glen L. Niebur

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai Nan An
Kai Nan An Mayo Clinic
Tony M. Keaveny
Tony M. Keaveny University of California, Berkeley
John E. Renaud
John E. Renaud University of Notre Dame
Peter E. McHugh
Peter E. McHugh University of Galway
Eiji Itoi
Eiji Itoi Tohoku University
Kiyoshi Kaneda
Kiyoshi Kaneda Hokkaido University
Akio Minami
Akio Minami Hokkaido University
Graham J.W. King
Graham J.W. King University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students are now seeking flexible study options that fit their schedules and evolving industry needs. Online programs allow learners to expand their qualifications without putting their careers on hold.

If you’re interested in fields that complement or enhance your engineering expertise, consider a cheap online hr masters degree to gain crucial skills in organizational management. For those looking to improve their leadership and business skills quickly, a one year online mba entrepreneurship program could be the perfect fit.

Effective communication is vital in any technology-driven role. An online master's in communication can help sharpen your messaging and interpersonal skills, making you an asset to any organization. Additionally, professionals who seek a fast-track to management may opt for a 1 year online mba no gmat for greater convenience and accessibility.

By pursuing these related online degrees, engineering graduates can access broader career opportunities and adapt to the ever-evolving workplace.

Best Scientists Citing Glen L. Niebur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles