World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans-Joachim Wilke

Hans-Joachim Wilke

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 86 365 346 7 7 385 26836
Medicine 89 12658 11914 680 656 485 30458

Hans-Joachim Wilke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hans-Joachim Wilke between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hans-Joachim Wilke published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2022. 56 of the 588 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2022. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 24 publications
1978 2025

588 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hans-Joachim Wilke: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 4
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 8
1993 0
1994 9
1995 4
1996 6
1997 15
1998 17
1999 17
2000 14
2001 16
2002 15
2003 9
2004 9
2005 11
2006 28
2007 20
2008 23
2009 12
2010 13
2011 18
2012 27
2013 13
2014 23
2015 13
2016 12
2017 22
2018 25
2019 12
2020 20
2021 31
2022 36
2023 18
2024 32
2025 24
Total 588
Download as CSV

Hans-Joachim Wilke publications per year - data summary

  • Hans-Joachim Wilke, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Ulm, has 588 publications recorded across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 36 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1978, with 1 publication.
  • 10 of the 48 years in the span carry no publications at all (1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.5 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 141 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1993: 24 publications (1.5 per year); 1994-2009: 225 publications (14.1 per year); 2010-2025: 339 publications (21.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Hans-Joachim Wilke publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Joachim Wilke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 378–387 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 385 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97 385
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Hans-Joachim Wilke publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Hans-Joachim Wilke, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Ulm, records 385 publications - the 88th percentile of the discipline.
  • 88% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Hans-Joachim Wilke, and about 12% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Hans-Joachim Wilke ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Hans-Joachim Wilke D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Joachim Wilke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25 86
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Hans-Joachim Wilke D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Hans-Joachim Wilke, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Ulm, records 86 D-Index - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Hans-Joachim Wilke, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Hans-Joachim Wilke ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Hans-Joachim Wilke is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany and has made significant contributions primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on spinal pathology and treatment.

The main research topics of Hans-Joachim Wilke include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Scoliosis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

The scientist works in multiple subfields of Medicine, notably:

  • Surgery
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Pharmacology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Hans-Joachim Wilke's recent academic contributions include the following papers:

  • Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility, 2022, European Spine Journal
  • A Deep Learning Model for the Accurate and Reliable Classification of Disc Degeneration Based on MRI Data, 2020, Investigative Radiology
  • Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years, 2020, European Spine Journal
  • A comprehensive tool box for large animal studies of intervertebral disc degeneration, 2021, JOR Spine
  • Intelligence-Based Spine Care Model: A New Era of Research and Clinical Decision-Making, 2020, Global Spine Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hans-Joachim Wilke include:

  • Fabio Galbusera
  • Christian Liebsch
  • Youping Tao
  • Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke
  • Dino Samartzis

The most frequent publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Brain and Spine
  • European Spine Journal
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • JOR Spine
  • The Spine Journal

In addition to journal articles, Hans-Joachim Wilke has contributed to books, including a publication with VVW eBooks titled Handbuch zur privaten Haftpflichtversicherung, released in 2022.

Best Publications

  • New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life.

    Hans–Joachim Wilke;Peter Neef;Marco Caimi;Thomas Hoogland

  • Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants

    H.-J. Wilke;K. Wenger;L. Claes

  • Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.

    W Schmoelz;J F Huber;T Nydegger;Dipl-Ing

  • Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?

    Mauro Alini;Stephen Eisenstein;Keita Ito;Christopher Little

  • Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups. A biomechanical in vitro study.

    Hans-Joachim Wilke;Steffen Wolf;Lutz E. Claes;Markus Arand

  • Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing

    Lutz Claes;Peter Augat;Gebhard Suger;Hans-Joachim Wilke

  • Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data--a data set for the validation of models.

    Hans-Joachim Wilke;Peter Neef;Barbara Hinz;Helmut Seidel

  • Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines

    Hans-Joachim Wilke;Annette Kettler;Lutz E. Claes

  • Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method.

    Antonius Rohlmann;Thomas Zander;Hendrik Schmidt;Hendrik Schmidt;Hans-Joachim Wilke

  • Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: Predictive power of models improves when combined together

    M. Dreischarf;T. Zander;A. Shirazi-Adl;C.M. Puttlitz

  • Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine.

    Hans-Joachim Wilke;Annette Kettler;Karl Howard Wenger;Lutz Eberhardt Claes

  • Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus.

    Hendrik Schmidt;Frank Heuer;Ulrich Simon;Annette Kettler

  • Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques.

    Marcus Richter;René Schmidt;Lutz Claes;Wolfhart Puhl

  • Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

    Fabio Galbusera;David Volkheimer;Sandra Reitmaier;Nikolaus Berger-Roscher

  • Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure

    Hans Joachim Wilke;J. Drumm;K. Häussler;C. MacK

  • Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration

    Annette Kettler;Hans-Joachim Wilke

  • A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

    H. J. Wilke;L. Claes;H. Schmitt;S. Wolf

  • Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.

    Hendrik Schmidt;Annette Kettler;Frank Heuer;Ulrich Simon

  • Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.

    Antonius Rohlmann;Sylvia Neller;Lutz Claes;Georg Bergmann

  • Cyclic stretching of human osteoblasts affects proliferation and metabolism: a new experimental method and its application.

    Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke;Hans-Joachim Wilke;Lutz Claes

Frequent Co-Authors

Lutz Claes
Lutz Claes University of Ulm
Hendrik Schmidt
Hendrik Schmidt Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Antonius Rohlmann
Antonius Rohlmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Philippe K. Zysset
Philippe K. Zysset University of Bern
Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl
Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl Polytechnique Montréal
Georg Bergmann
Georg Bergmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Rami Haj-Ali
Rami Haj-Ali Tel Aviv University
Joaquim M. Oliveira
Joaquim M. Oliveira University of Minho
Rui L. Reis
Rui L. Reis University of Minho
Mário A. Barbosa
Mário A. Barbosa University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology continues to impact every sector, online degrees allow you to access in-demand career paths and specialized skills from anywhere. Students interested in digital product design can consider a ux design degree online, building expertise in user experience for web and app design.

For those aiming to lead in tech or engineering environments, earning a project manager degree provides critical skills for overseeing complex initiatives, time management, and team coordination.

With the rise of cryptocurrencies and secure transactions, pursuing a blockchain degree online opens career paths in financial technology, blockchain development, and innovation in data security.

If you’re interested in sports, business, and technology, exploring an online sports degree can prepare you for dynamic roles in sports management, marketing, and analytics.

Whether you’re seeking flexibility, affordability, or specialized expertise, these online degree options provide multiple pathways to advance your education and achieve your career goals within the fast-paced world of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Joachim Wilke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles