World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
68
Citations
14805
World Ranking
1239
National Ranking
5

Peter Augat publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Augat sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 187 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter Augat D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Augat sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Austria Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process.

    Lutz E. Claes;Christa A. Heigele;Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke;Daniela Kaspar

  • Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing

    Lutz Claes;Peter Augat;Gebhard Suger;Hans-Joachim Wilke

  • The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength

    Peter Augat;Sandra Schorlemmer

  • Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model.

    Peter Augat;Johannes Burger;Sandra Schorlemmer;Thomas Henke

  • Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell

    P. Augat;H. Reeb;L. E. Claes

  • Mechanics and mechano-biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone

    Peter Augat;Ulrich Simon;Astrid Liedert;Lutz Claes

  • High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Three-Dimensional Trabecular Bone Architecture and Biomechanical Properties

    S. Majumdar;M. Kothari;P. Augat;D.C. Newitt

  • The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing

    Lutz Claes;Kerstin Eckert-Hübner;Peter Augat

  • Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: Precision and relation to bone strength

    T.F. Lang;J.H. Keyak;M.W. Heitz;P. Augat

  • Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation.

    Claes Le;Wilke Hj;Augat P;Rübenacker S

  • Far Cortical Locking Can Improve Healing of Fractures Stabilized with Locking Plates

    Michael Bottlang;Maren Lesser;Julia Koerber;Josef Doornink

  • Local tissue properties in bone healing: influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap.

    Peter Augat;Kristen Margevicius;Jörg Simon;Steffen Wolf

  • Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro

    N.J Wachter;G.D Krischak;M Mentzel;M.R Sarkar

  • Effects of Construct Stiffness on Healing of Fractures Stabilized with Locking Plates

    Michael Bottlang;Josef Doornink;Trevor J Lujan;Daniel C Fitzpatrick

  • Bone formation in a long bone defect model using a platelet-rich plasma-loaded collagen scaffold

    Michael R. Sarkar;Peter Augat;Sandra J. Shefelbine;Sandra Schorlemmer

  • Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis

    Sandra J. Shefelbine;Ulrich Simon;Lutz Claes;Andreas Gold

  • A Comparative Study of Trabecular Bone Properties in the Spine and Femur Using High Resolution MRI and CT

    Thomas M. Link;Thomas M. Link;Sharmila Majumdar;John C. Lin;David Newitt

  • Trabecular Bone Architecture in the Distal Radius Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Subjects with Fractures of the Proximal Femur

    S. Majumdar;T. M. Link;Peter Augat;J. C. Lin

  • Measuring power during the sit-to-stand transfer

    Unknown

  • Trabecular bone fracture healing simulation with finite element analysis and fuzzy logic

    Sandra J. Shefelbine;Peter Augat;Lutz Claes;Ulrich Simon

  • Influence of diclofenac (group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) on fracture healing.

    A Beck;G Krischak;T Sorg;P Augat

  • Quantitative Assessment of Experimental Fracture Repair by Peripheral Computed Tomography

    P. Augat;J. Merk;H. K. Genant;L. Claes

Frequent Co-Authors

Lutz Claes
Lutz Claes University of Ulm
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Sharmila Majumdar
Sharmila Majumdar University of California, San Francisco
Thomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link University of California, San Francisco
Thomas Lang
Thomas Lang University of California, San Francisco
Ying Lu
Ying Lu Stanford University
Nancy E. Lane
Nancy E. Lane University of California, Davis
Oliver Trapp
Oliver Trapp Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hans-Joachim Wilke
Hans-Joachim Wilke University of Ulm
Didier Hans
Didier Hans University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to many interconnected career paths and educational opportunities. For students looking to expand their business skills quickly, the 6 month mba program is an excellent option. This accelerated degree equips graduates with leadership and management expertise that complements a technical background.

If you’re interested in the legal side of technology, consider enrolling in paralegal online programs. These programs are ideal for those seeking to specialize in intellectual property, patents, and technology law.

For students aiming to strengthen their financial skills, recognizing the importance of accurate records in all tech-driven businesses, exploring the best bookkeeping certification programs can be a smart career move.

Additionally, students seeking foundational administrative expertise may pursue an associate degree in office management online. This qualification is valuable in supporting technical teams and operations in tech companies or engineering firms.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Augat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles