World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1674 1503 797 706 247 11065

Jeff Niederdeppe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeff Niederdeppe between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeff Niederdeppe published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2023. 15 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeff Niederdeppe: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 7
2004 6
2005 6
2006 1
2007 5
2008 8
2009 3
2010 8
2011 13
2012 8
2013 19
2014 19
2015 11
2016 14
2017 17
2018 18
2019 20
2020 15
2021 19
2022 15
2023 23
2024 10
2025 14
2026 1
Total 282
Download as CSV

Jeff Niederdeppe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Niederdeppe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 247 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 247
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeff Niederdeppe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Niederdeppe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Frank Prize, University of Florida

Overview

Jeff Niederdeppe is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and specializes in research at the intersection of social sciences and medicine. Their work is predominantly centered on behavioral health and interventions, smoking behavior and cessation, and media influence on health. Additional focus areas include climate change communication and perception, media studies and communication, misinformation and its impacts, as well as obesity, physical activity, and diet.

Niederdeppe's research spans several subfields, notably sociology and political science, applied psychology, physiology, literature and literary theory, and general health professions. This multidisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive investigation of health communication and policy topics.

Frequent coauthors of Niederdeppe include Erika Franklin Fowler, Sarah E. Gollust, Jiawei Liu, Rosemary J. Avery, and Laura Baum, reflecting collaboration within public health, communication, and policy research communities.

Common venues for publication include:

  • Health Communication
  • Journal of Health Communication
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Milbank Quarterly
  • Preventive Medicine

Some recent papers coauthored by Niederdeppe illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Evidence-Based Message Strategies to Increase Public Support for State Investment in Early Childhood Education, 2021, Milbank Quarterly
  • Strategic Messaging to Promote Policies that Advance Racial Equity: What Do We Know, and What Do We Need to Learn?, 2023, Milbank Quarterly
  • Testing Strategies to Increase Source Credibility through Strategic Message Design in the Context of Vaccination and Vaccine Hesitancy, 2020, Health Communication
  • Noticing people, discounts and non-tobacco flavours in e-cigarette ads may increase e-cigarette product appeal among non-tobacco-using young adults, 2022, Tobacco Control
  • Information Seeking and Scanning about Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black and White Americans, Ages 45-74: Comparing Information Sources and Screening Behaviors, 2020, Journal of Health Communication

Throughout their career, Niederdeppe has contributed extensively to the literature on media influence in health behaviors and policy support, often employing strategic messaging and communication frameworks to study public perceptions and behavior change.

In 2016, Niederdeppe received the Frank Prize awarded by the University of Florida, recognizing their contributions in their field.

Best Publications

  • Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention and Three Prevention Behaviors

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Andrea Gurmankin Levy

  • Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior.

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Robert C Hornik;Bridget J Kelly;Dominick L Frosch

  • Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions

    Matthew Farrelly;Jeffrey Niederdeppe;Jared Yarsevich

  • Attributions of Responsibility for Obesity: Narrative Communication Reduces Reactive Counterarguing among Liberals.

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Michael A. Shapiro;Norman Porticella

  • Message Design Strategies to Raise Public Awareness of Social Determinants of Health and Population Health Disparities

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Q. Lisa Bu;Porismita Borah;David A. Kindig

  • Cancer Information Scanning and Seeking in the General Population

    Bridget Kelly;Robert Hornik;Anca Romantan;J. Sanford Schwartz

  • Media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: what do we know, what do we need to learn, and what should we do now?

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Xiaodong Kuang;Brittney Crock;Ashley Skelton

  • Misinformation as a Misunderstood Challenge to Public Health.

    Brian G Southwell;Brian G Southwell;Brian G Southwell;Jeff Niederdeppe;Joseph N Cappella;Anna Gaysynsky

  • The Role of Emotional Response during an H1N1 Influenza Pandemic on a College Campus

    Hye Kyung Kim;Jeff Niederdeppe

  • The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: Establishing predictive and discriminant validity

    Jakob D. Jensen;Nick Carcioppolo;Andy J. King;Courtney L. Scherr

  • Confirming “truth”: More Evidence of a Successful Tobacco Countermarketing Campaign in Florida

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Matthew C. Farrelly;M. Lyndon Haviland

  • Pathways of Influence in Emotional Appeals: Benefits and Tradeoffs of Using Fear or Humor to Promote Climate Change-Related Intentions and Risk Perceptions

    Christofer Skurka;Jeff Niederdeppe;Rainer Romero-Canyas;David Acup

  • Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy

    Sarah E. Gollust;Jeff Niederdeppe;Colleen L. Barry

  • Smoking-Cessation Media Campaigns and Their Effectiveness Among Socioeconomically Advantaged and Disadvantaged Populations

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Michael C. Fiore;Timothy B. Baker;Stevens S. Smith

  • Primary care physicians’ perspectives on the prescription opioid epidemic

    Alene Kennedy-Hendricks;Susan H. Busch;Emma Elizabeth McGinty;Marcus A. Bachhuber

  • Narrative Persuasion, Causality, Complex Integration, and Support for Obesity Policy

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Michael A Shapiro;Hye Kyung Kim;Danielle Bartolo

  • Public perceptions of arguments supporting and opposing recreational marijuana legalization

    Emma Beth McGinty;Jeff Niederdeppe;Kathryn Heley;Colleen L Barry

  • The theory of "truth": how counterindustry campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens.

    James C Hershey;Jeff Niederdeppe;W Douglas Evans;James Nonnemaker

  • Refining the tobacco dependence phenotype using the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives.

    Megan E. Piper;Daniel M. Bolt;Su Young Kim;Sandra J. Japuntich

  • Public support for safe consumption sites and syringe services programs to combat the opioid epidemic.

    Emma E. McGinty;Colleen L. Barry;Elizabeth M. Stone;Jeff Niederdeppe

  • Exploring differences in smokers' perceptions of the effectiveness of cessation media messages

    Kevin C Davis;James M Nonnemaker;Matthew C Farrelly;Jeff Niederdeppe

Frequent Co-Authors

Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Sarah E. Gollust
Sarah E. Gollust University of Minnesota
Erika Franklin Fowler
Erika Franklin Fowler Wesleyan University
Matthew C. Farrelly
Matthew C. Farrelly RTI International
Barbara A. Knuth
Barbara A. Knuth Cornell University
James F. Thrasher
James F. Thrasher University of South Carolina
Kathy Chapman
Kathy Chapman University of Sydney
Emma E. McGinty
Emma E. McGinty Cornell University
Robert C. Hornik
Robert C. Hornik University of Pennsylvania
James M. Nonnemaker
James M. Nonnemaker Research Triangle Park Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities can open up diverse educational and professional opportunities. Many students are now looking at flexible options, such as online master programs, that allow them to balance their studies with work and personal commitments. These programs can deliver a high-quality education while offering convenience and speed.

For example, masters programs in psychology are popular choices for those interested in human behavior, clinical practice, or organizational development. Students who want to advance faster may prefer accelerated online programs, where you can earn your bachelor’s in less time than traditional pathways.

Aspiring educators and administrators can consider edd degrees that are designed for working professionals and can often be completed quickly through fast-track formats. For those seeking to elevate their expertise even further, online master programs that can be completed in as little as one year provide an excellent opportunity to specialize while maintaining a flexible schedule.

These online degree options can lead to rewarding careers in counseling, teaching, public service, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff Niederdeppe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles