World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4710 4357 329 316 137 8215

Kathy Chapman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathy Chapman between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathy Chapman published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 10 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
2006 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathy Chapman: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 10
2011 17
2012 17
2013 13
2014 18
2015 14
2016 11
2017 10
2018 5
2019 6
2020 4
2021 2
2022 7
2023 2
2024 6
2025 4
Total 161
Download as CSV

Kathy Chapman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathy Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 137
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathy Chapman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathy Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathy Chapman is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these domains, Chapman has focused notably on genetics and public health, environmental, and occupational health, alongside pulmonary and respiratory medicine, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their scientific work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Tracheal and airway disorders

Chapman's frequent collaborators include Adriane L. Baylis, Mary Hardin-Jones, Richard E. Kirschner, Sarah Hatch Pollard, and Thomas J. Sitzman. These partnerships have contributed to a significant portion of their published work.

The scientist commonly publishes in several academic venues, with multiple papers featured in:

  • The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
  • Nutrients
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Social Science & Medicine

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • The relative importance of primary food choice factors among different consumer groups: A latent profile analysis, 2021, Food Quality and Preference
  • The Contribution of Foods Prepared Outside the Home to the Diets of 18- to 30-Year-Old Australians: The MYMeals Study, 2021, Nutrients
  • Non-Oral Compensatory Misarticulations Revisited, 2021, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
  • Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • Translating research into practice: outcomes from the Healthy Living after Cancer partnership project, 2020, BMC Cancer

Best Publications

  • Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups

    Billie Bonevski;Billie Bonevski;Madeleine Randell;Chris Paul;Kathy Chapman

  • Television food advertising to children: a global perspective.

    Bridget Kelly;Jason C.G. Halford;Emma J. Boyland;Kathy Chapman

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors.

    Fiona G. Stacey;Erica L. James;Kathy Chapman;Kerry S. Courneya

  • Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market

    Bridget Kelly;Clare Hughes;Kathy Chapman;Jimmy Chun Yu Louie

  • Association between food marketing exposure and adolescents’ food choices and eating behaviors

    Maree Scully;Melanie Wakefield;Philippa Niven;Kathy Chapman

  • Digital junk: food and beverage marketing on Facebook.

    Becky Freeman;Bridget Kelly;Louise Baur;Kathy Chapman

  • Effects of nutrient content claims, sports celebrity endorsements and premium offers on pre-adolescent children's food preferences: experimental research.

    Helen Dixon;Maree Scully;Phillippa Niven;Bridget Kelly

  • Fruit and vegetables should be targeted separately in health promotion programmes: differences in consumption levels, barriers, knowledge and stages of readiness for change

    Colleen Glasson;Kathy Chapman;Erica James

  • How much food advertising is there on Australian television

    Kathy Chapman;Penny Nicholas;Rajah Supramaniam

  • Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study

    Helen Dixon;Maree Scully;Melanie Wakefield;Bridget Kelly

  • Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers’ responses to seven labelling formats

    Wendy L. Watson;Bridget Kelly;Bridget Kelly;Debra Hector;Clare Hughes

  • The extent and nature of food promotion directed to children in Australian supermarkets

    Kathy Chapman;Penny Nicholas;Debbie Banovic;Rajah Supramaniam

  • Sustained impact of energy-dense TV and online food advertising on children's dietary intake: a within-subject, randomised, crossover, counter-balanced trial.

    Jennifer A Norman;Bridget Kelly;Anne T McMahon;Emma J Boyland

  • Internet food marketing on popular children's websites and food product websites in Australia.

    Bridget P Kelly;Katarzyna Bochynska;Kelly Kornman;Kathy Chapman

  • Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk

    Penelope Buykx;Penelope Buykx;Conor Gilligan;Bernadette Maree Ward;Rebecca Kippen;Rebecca Kippen

  • The effects of television and Internet food advertising on parents and children

    Simone Pettigrew;Liudmila Tarabashkina;Michele Roberts;Pascale Quester

  • Parental perceptions of barriers to children's participation in organised sport in Australia

    Louise L. Hardy;Bridget Kelly;Kathryn Chapman;Lesley King

  • Advertising of fast food to children on Australian television: the impact of industry self-regulation

    Lana A Hebden;Lesley King;Anne Grunseit;Bridget Kelly

  • Industry self regulation of television food advertising: responsible or responsive?

    Lesley King;Lana Hebden;Anne Grunseit;Bridget Kelly

  • "Food company sponsors are kind, generous and cool": (Mis)conceptions of junior sports players

    Bridget Kelly;Louise Baur;Adrian Bauman;Lesley King

Frequent Co-Authors

Bridget Kelly
Bridget Kelly University of Wollongong
Lesley King
Lesley King University of Sydney
Louise A. Baur
Louise A. Baur University of Sydney
Simone Pettigrew
Simone Pettigrew George Institute for Global Health
Adrian Bauman
Adrian Bauman University of Sydney
Melanie Wakefield
Melanie Wakefield Cancer Council Victoria
Pascale G. Quester
Pascale G. Quester Swinburne University of Technology
Emma J. Boyland
Emma J. Boyland University of Liverpool
Kerry S. Courneya
Kerry S. Courneya University of Alberta
David R. Lubans
David R. Lubans University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Social Sciences and Humanities can open up diverse career opportunities. For those drawn to counseling, advocacy, or community work, msw online programs provide flexibility and affordability for aspiring social workers. These programs are designed to accommodate working professionals, enabling you to balance studies with your current commitments.

If you wish to specialize further in behavioral health, earning a accelerated bcba program online can prepare you for roles in applied behavior analysis. Such pathways are especially valuable in clinical, educational, and community settings.

For those seeking to complete their studies quickly, masters in social work accelerated programs or an accelerated psychology degree can help you enter the workforce sooner. These fast-track options focus on practical knowledge and fieldwork, making them suitable for students with clear professional goals.

Whether you're interested in online social work, behavioral analysis, or psychology, there are pathways to match every ambition—each offering flexibility, accessibility, and quality in your academic journey.

Best Scientists Citing Kathy Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles