World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
21727
World Ranking
15762
National Ranking
7934

Michael J. Marks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Marks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 219 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael J. Marks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Marks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Marks is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their scholarly work spans several fields, with a focus on social sciences, including sociology and political science, gender studies, clinical psychology, infectious diseases, and molecular biology.

Their research covers a range of specialized topics, emphasizing:

  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Marks has contributed to several publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in venues such as:

  • IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • Sexuality & Culture
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • International Journal of Sexual Health

Frequent collaborators in Marks's work include:

  • Cecilia Gotti
  • Neil S. Millar
  • Susan Wonnacott
  • Joshua S. Davis
  • Asha C Bowen

Recent publications by Michael J. Marks demonstrate a focus on topics related to sexual health, social perceptions, and infectious disease treatment protocols. Selected recent papers include:

  • Does Adjunctive Clindamycin Have a Role in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia? A Protocol for the Adjunctive Treatment Domain of the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Randomized Controlled Trial, 2024, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Sugar Dating, Perceptions of Power, and Condom Use: Comparing the Sexual Health Risk Behaviours of Sugar Dating to Non-Sugar Dating Women, 2021, The Journal of Sex Research
  • The Relationship between the Sexual Double Standard and Women's Sexual Health and Comfort, 2022, International Journal of Sexual Health
  • Double Standards in Perceived Traits of Women Labeled Victims Versus Survivors, 2020, Sexuality & Culture
  • Perceptions of a Hypothetical Sexual Assault: The Impact of the Interrelationships Between Eight Situational Factors, 2022, Violence Against Women

Best Publications

  • Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research

    Shannon G. Matta;David J. Balfour;Neal L. Benowitz;R. Thomas Boyd

  • Nicotine Activation of α4* Receptors: Sufficient for Reward, Tolerance, and Sensitization

    Andrew R. Tapper;Sheri L. McKinney;Sheri L. McKinney;Sheri L. McKinney;Raad Nashmi;Raad Nashmi;Raad Nashmi;Johannes Schwarz;Johannes Schwarz;Johannes Schwarz

  • International Union of Pharmacology. XX. Current Status of the Nomenclature for Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Their Subunits

    R. J. Lukas;J.-P. Changeux;N. Le Novere;E. X. Albuquerque

  • Habenular α5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake

    Christie D. Fowler;Qun Lu;Paul M. Johnson;Michael J. Marks

  • Effects of chronic nicotine infusion on tolerance development and nicotinic receptors.

    M J Marks;J B Burch;A C Collins

  • Nicotine binding and nicotinic receptor subunit RNA after chronic nicotine treatment.

    MJ Marks;JR Pauly;SD Gross;ES Deneris

  • Effect of Smoking History on [3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Postmortem Brain

    Charles R. Breese;Michael J. Marks;Judy Logel;Cathy E. Adams

  • Characterization of nicotinic receptor-mediated [3H]dopamine release from synaptosomes prepared from mouse striatum.

    Sharon Grady;Michael J. Marks;Susan Wonnacott;Allan C. Collins

  • Subunit composition and pharmacology of two classes of striatal presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors mediating dopamine release in mice.

    Outi Salminen;Karen L. Murphy;Karen L. Murphy;J. Michael McIntosh;John Drago

  • Abnormal Regulation of High Affinity Nicotinic Receptors in Subjects with Schizophrenia

    Charles R Breese;Michael J Lee;Cathy E Adams;Bernadette Sullivan

  • Nicotinic binding sites in rat and mouse brain: comparison of acetylcholine, nicotine, and alpha-bungarotoxin.

    M J Marks;J A Stitzel;E Romm;J M Wehner

  • Time course study of the effects of chronic nicotine infusion on drug response and brain receptors.

    M J Marks;J A Stitzel;A C Collins

  • Chronic Nicotine Cell Specifically Upregulates Functional α4* Nicotinic Receptors: Basis for Both Tolerance in Midbrain and Enhanced Long-Term Potentiation in Perforant Path

    Raad Nashmi;Cheng Xiao;Purnima Deshpande;Sheri McKinney

  • The Subtypes of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Dopaminergic Terminals of Mouse Striatum

    Sharon R. Grady;Outi Salminen;Duncan C. Laverty;Paul Whiteaker

  • Analogs of α-conotoxin MII are selective for α6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

    J. Michael McIntosh;Layla Azam;Sarah Staheli;Cheryl Dowell

  • Downregulation of nicotinic receptor function after chronic nicotine infusion.

    M J Marks;S R Grady;A C Collins

  • Genetic correlation of inhibitory gating of hippocampal auditory evoked response and α-bungarotoxin-binding nicotinic cholinergic receptors in inbred mouse strains

    Karen E. Stevens;Karen E. Stevens;Robert Freedman;Robert Freedman;Allan C. Collins;Michael Hall

  • Rodent Habenulo–Interpeduncular Pathway Expresses a Large Variety of Uncommon nAChR Subtypes, But Only the α3β4 and α3β3β4 Subtypes Mediate Acetylcholine Release

    Sharon R. Grady;Milena Moretti;Michele Zoli;Michael J. Marks

  • In Vivo Activation of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons via Sensitized, High-Affinity α6* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

    Ryan M. Drenan;Sharon R. Grady;Paul Whiteaker;Tristan McClure-Begley

  • 125I-α-Conotoxin MII Identifies a Novel Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Population in Mouse Brain

    Paul Whiteaker;J. Michael McIntosh;Siqin Luo;Allan C. Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan C. Collins
Allan C. Collins University of Colorado Boulder
J. Michael McIntosh
J. Michael McIntosh University of Utah
Henry A. Lester
Henry A. Lester California Institute of Technology
Marina R. Picciotto
Marina R. Picciotto Yale University
Jean-Pierre Changeux
Jean-Pierre Changeux Institut Pasteur
Jon Lindstrom
Jon Lindstrom University of Pennsylvania
Susan Wonnacott
Susan Wonnacott University of Bath
Cecilia Gotti
Cecilia Gotti National Research Council (CNR)
Michele Zoli
Michele Zoli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Karen E. Stevens
Karen E. Stevens University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA isn’t limited to just traditional medical schools. There are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare, especially in nursing, that can offer flexible and affordable options.

For those looking to advance in the nursing field, affordable and reputable programs exist. With the cheapest phd nursing programs, you can achieve the highest academic credential in nursing with less financial strain. If you’re an RN without a bachelor’s degree, numerous cheap rn to bsn online programs help you earn your BSN quickly and cost-effectively.

Even if your undergraduate background isn’t in nursing, it’s still possible to transition to an advanced role. Some schools offer pathways like non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs, allowing career changers to enter nursing with a master’s degree. For those worried about meeting strict entry criteria, check out the easiest nursing schools to get into, which may offer less competitive admission requirements.

These online options expand access, offer flexibility, and can be stepping stones to diverse roles in healthcare, making a medical career in the USA more attainable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Marks

Trending Scientists