World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
5475
World Ranking
8094
National Ranking
119

Marilyne Andersen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marilyne Andersen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 363 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Marilyne Andersen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marilyne Andersen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marilyne Andersen is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science, with a specific focus on Building and Construction, Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics addressed in their work include Building Energy and Comfort Optimization, Impact of Light on Environment and Health, Color Perception and Design, Urban Green Space and Health, Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques.

Frequent co-authors in Andersen's research collaborations are:

  • Jan Wienold
  • Caroline Karmann
  • Yunni Cho
  • Steffen L. Hartmeyer
  • Giorgia Chinazzo

Andersen's work has been published extensively in several venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • Building and Environment
  • Building Simulation Conference proceedings
  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
  • Lighting Research & Technology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Andersen cover a range of topics in environmental perception, lighting, and human health. Notable publications include:

  • Temperature-Color Interaction: Subjective Indoor Environmental Perception and Physiological Responses in Virtual Reality, 2020, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Window Size Effects on Subjective Impressions of Daylit Spaces: Indoor Studies at High Latitudes Using Virtual Reality, 2020, LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
  • The spectral sensitivity of human circadian phase resetting and melatonin suppression to light changes dynamically with light duration, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Window View Quality: Why It Matters and What We Should Do, 2022, LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
  • ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans, 2023, EBioMedicine

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel

    Christoph F. Reinhart;Marilyne Andersen

  • Adequacy of Immersive Virtual Reality for the Perception of Daylit Spaces: Comparison of Real and Virtual Environments

    Kynthia Chamilothori;Jan Wienold;Marilyne Andersen

  • A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight – Part I: photobiology- based model

    Marilyne Andersen;John Mardaljevic;Steven W. Lockley

  • DAYLIGHTING METRICS: IS THERE A RELATION BETWEEN USEFUL DAYLIGHT ILLUMINANCE AND DAYLIGHT GLARE PROBABILITY?

    J. Mardaljevic;Marilyne Andersen;Nicolas Roy;J. Christoffersen

  • Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE)

    Lisa Heschong;Van Den Wymelenberg;Keven;Marilyne Andersen

  • Occupants interaction with electric lighting and shading systems in real single-occupied offices: Results from a monitoring campaign

    Pedro Correia da Silva;Vítor Leal;Marilyne Andersen

  • Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces

    Pedro Correia da Silva;Vítor Leal;Marilyne Andersen

  • Improved upper limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background from 2009-2010 LIGO and Virgo data

    J. Aasi;B. P. Abbott;R. Abbott;T. Abbott

  • Preliminary Method for Prospective Analysis of the Circadian Efficacy of (Day)Light with Applications to Healthcare Architecture

    Christopher S. Pechacek;Marilyne Andersen;Steven W. Lockley

  • A human-centric approach to assess daylight in buildings for non-visual health potential, visual interest and gaze behavior

    María Lovísa Ámundadóttir;Siobhan Francois Rockcastle;Mandana Sarey Khanie;Marilyne Andersen

  • An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach

    Marilyne Andersen;Sian A. Kleindienst;Lu Yi;Jaime Lee

  • Subjective and physiological responses to façade and sunlight pattern geometry in virtual reality

    Kynthia Chamilothori;Giorgia Chinazzo;João Pedro de Matos Rodrigues;Elise Dan-Glauser

  • Unweaving the human response in daylighting design

    Marilyne Andersen

  • Daylighting Metrics for Residential Buildings

    J. Mardaljevic;Marilyne Andersen;Nicolas Roy;Jens Christoffersen

  • Experimental validation of simulation methods for bi-directional transmission properties at the daylighting performance level

    Fawaz Maamari;Marilyne Andersen;Jan de Boer;William L. Carroll

  • Daylight affects human thermal perception

    Giorgia Chinazzo;Jan Wienold;Marilyne Andersen

  • Goniophotometry and assessment of bidirectional photometric properties of complex fenestration systems

    Marilyne Andersen;Jan de Boer

  • Bi-directional transmission properties of Venetian blinds: experimental assessment compared to ray-tracing calculations

    Marilyne Andersen;M. Rubin;R. Powles;Jean-Louis Scartezzini

  • Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics:

    J Wienold;T Iwata;M Sarey Khanie;E Erell

  • Graphical Representation of Climate-Based Daylight Performance to Support Architectural Design

    Siân Kleindienst;Magali Bodart;Marilyne Andersen

  • Review and critical analysis of early-design phase evaluation metrics for the solar potential of neighborhood designs

    Emilie Nault;Giuseppe Peronato;Emmanuel Rey;Marilyne Andersen

  • A generative facade design method based on daylighting performance goals

    Jaime Gagne;Marilyne Andersen

  • Comparing daylighting performance assessment of buildings in scale models and test modules

    Anothai Thanachareonkit;Jean-Louis Scartezzini;Marilyne Andersen

  • Building energy certification versus user satisfaction with the indoor environment: Findings from a multi-site post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in Switzerland

    Luisa Pastore;Marilyne Andersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Hjorth
Jens Hjorth University of Copenhagen
Bruce Allen
Bruce Allen Max Planck Society
Fan Zhang
Fan Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
N. A. Robertson
N. A. Robertson California Institute of Technology
Roman Schnabel
Roman Schnabel Universität Hamburg
Maria Alessandra Papa
Maria Alessandra Papa Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics
Bernard F. Schutz
Bernard F. Schutz Cardiff University
Jean-Louis Scartezzini
Jean-Louis Scartezzini École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Laura Cadonati
Laura Cadonati Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology opens doors to a range of related fields and advanced career options. Complementary online programs allow students to widen their skill sets and prepare for leadership in technical and business environments.

For those seeking to understand the business side of technology, a business administration online degree provides foundational knowledge in management, finance, and operations—essential for managerial roles at tech firms. Aspiring leaders might opt for an organizational management degree online, focusing on effective leadership practices and strategic planning within technical teams.

Advancing further, online mba programs in operations management teach principles crucial for overseeing projects, processes, and people in engineering-driven sectors. For streamlined admissions, consider the best online mba programs no gmat to transition efficiently into higher-level management roles without standardized test requirements.

By combining technical expertise with business acumen through these online pathways, engineering professionals can accelerate their careers and adapt to the evolving demands of the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Marilyne Andersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles