World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
82
Citations
24641
World Ranking
3689
National Ranking
1837

Michael W. Miller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 243 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael W. Miller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael W. Miller is affiliated with MSD in the United States. Their work primarily connects to the pharmaceutical and biomedical research sectors through this association.

While detailed records of their research papers, including titles, years of publication, and venues, are not available, Miller's contributions to scientific literature and research can be contextualized within their institutional affiliation.

There is no publicly listed information regarding frequent co-authors, which suggests collaborative networks have not been extensively documented or may not be publicly accessible.

Information about venues where Miller frequently publishes is also unavailable, indicating either a diverse publication record across multiple platforms or limited public documentation of their work.

There is no detailed data about book publications by Miller, meaning the focus appears to be on other types of scientific output or professional activities.

Specific fields and subfields of study associated with Miller have not been documented, which limits insight into the precise scientific domains or specialty areas of their research.

Similarly, data on main topics of work has not been recorded, leaving the thematic focus areas of Miller's research undetermined.

No awards or recognitions have been listed for Michael W. Miller, which may reflect either a limited public record or an emphasis on different aspects of a research career.

Best Publications

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Cavity solitons as pixels in semiconductor microcavities.

    Stephane Barland;Jorge R. Tredicce;Massimo Brambilla;Luigi A. Lugiato

  • Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer.

    Michael W Miller;Elizabeth S. C. P. Williams;N. Thompson Hobbs;Lisa L Wolfe

  • Infectious Prions in the Saliva and Blood of Deer with Chronic Wasting Disease

    Candace K. Mathiason;Jenny G. Powers;Sallie J. Dahmes;David A. Osborn

  • Design and implementation of microarray gene expression markup language (MAGE-ML)

    Paul T Spellman;Michael Miller;Jason Stewart;Charles Troup

  • Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

    Franz X. Schaub;Varsha Dhankani;Ashton C. Berger;Mihir Trivedi

  • Chronic Wasting Disease of Deer and Elk: A Review with Recommendations for Management

    Elizabeth S. Williams;Michael W. Miller;Terry J. Kreeger;Richard H. Kahn

  • Prion disease: Horizontal prion transmission in mule deer

    Michael W. Miller;Elizabeth S. Williams

  • Pharmacodynamics of the Type II Calcimimetic Compound Cinacalcet HCl

    Edward F. Nemeth;William H. Heaton;Michael Miller;John Fox

  • Oral transmission and early lymphoid tropism of chronic wasting disease PrPres in mule deer fawns (Odocoileus hemionus).

    Christina J. Sigurdson;Elizabeth S. Williams;Michael W. Miller;Terry R. Spraker

  • SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY IN FREE-RANGING MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS), WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK (CERVUS ELAPHUS NELSONI) IN NORTHCENTRAL COLORADO

    T. R. Spraker;M. W. Miller;E. S. Williams;D. M. Getzy

  • EPIZOOTIOLOGY OF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE IN FREE-RANGING CERVIDS IN COLORADO AND WYOMING

    M W Miller;E S Williams;C W McCarty;C W McCarty;T R Spraker

  • Evidence of a molecular barrier limiting susceptibility of humans, cattle and sheep to chronic wasting disease.

    G.J. Raymond;A. Bossers;L.D. Raymond;K.I. O'Rourke

  • Genomic, Pathway Network, and Immunologic Features Distinguishing Squamous Carcinomas

    Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Reanne Bowlby;Yuexin Liu

  • Chronic wasting disease and potential transmission to humans.

    Ermias D. Belay;Ryan A. Maddox;Elizabeth S. Williams;Michael W. Miller

  • Chronic wasting disease in deer and elk in North America.

    E S Williams;M W Miller

  • Asymptomatic Deer Excrete Infectious Prions in Faeces

    Gültekin Tamgüney;Michael W. Miller;Lisa L. Wolfe;Tracey M. Sirochman

  • A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TAB

    Tim F Rayner;Philippe Rocca-Serra;Paul T Spellman;Helen C Causton

  • The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project

    Kyle Chang;Chad J Creighton;Caleb Davis;Lawrence Donehower

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth S. Williams
Elizabeth S. Williams University of Wyoming
Daria J. Hazuda
Daria J. Hazuda MSD (United States)
Malcolm Maccoss
Malcolm Maccoss MSD (United States)
Sander G. Mills
Sander G. Mills MSD (United States)
N. Thompson Hobbs
N. Thompson Hobbs Colorado State University
Terry R. Spraker
Terry R. Spraker Colorado State University
Byron Caughey
Byron Caughey National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Jeffrey J. Hale
Jeffrey J. Hale MSD (United States)
William J. Greenlee
William J. Greenlee MSD (United States)
Richard E. Race
Richard E. Race National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to diverse online education and career pathways in health, science, and management. For example, students interested in advanced nursing roles can explore msn to dnp online no clinicals programs, which provide a streamlined route to leadership positions without in-person clinical hours.

Those drawn to the business side of healthcare may consider an online phd in healthcare management. This pathway equips graduates with the skills to shape policy and manage complex clinical organizations.

For those interested in medication and pharmaceutical sciences, online pharmd programs offer training for aspiring pharmacists, combining flexibility with rigorous education requirements.

Additionally, if you’re passionate about health, fitness, or sports medicine, a sports science degree online can lead to careers in coaching, personal training, or health promotion.

Online learning allows for greater accessibility and specialization, making it easier than ever to find a program that matches your interests and career goals in the biological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles