World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
10764
World Ranking
4048
National Ranking
1838

Linda P. Dwoskin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda P. Dwoskin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 306 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Linda P. Dwoskin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda P. Dwoskin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda P. Dwoskin is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics including:

  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Opioid use disorder treatment
  • Substance abuse treatment and outcomes
  • HIV, drug use, sexual risk
  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study
  • Ion channel regulation and function

Dwoskin's research extends into the following specialized subfields:

  • Cellular and molecular neuroscience
  • Molecular biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Public health, environmental and occupational health
  • Neurology

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications over recent years. Notable papers include:

  • A Comparative Effectiveness Study on Opioid Use Disorder Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence and Existing Risk Models, 2023, published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Total Synthesis of Decahydroquinoline Poison Frog Alkaloids ent-cis-195A and cis-211A, 2021, published in Molecules
  • Short-term CaMKII inhibition with tatCN19o does not erase pre-formed memory in mice and is neuroprotective in pigs, 2023, published in Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Integrating data science into the translational science research spectrum: A substance use disorder case study, 2020, published in Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Predicting Opioid Use Disorder from Longitudinal Healthcare Data using Multi-stream Transformer, 2021, published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent publication venues for Dwoskin's work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Molecules

Collaboration has been an important aspect of Dwoskin's scientific output. Frequent co-authors associated with this researcher are:

  • Sajjad Fouladvand
  • Jeffery Talbert
  • Heather Bush
  • Amy Lynn Meadows
  • Lars E. Peterson

Best Publications

  • Review of the pharmacology and clinical profile of bupropion, an antidepressant and tobacco use cessation agent.

    Linda P. Dwoskin;Anthony S. Rauhut;Kelley A. King-Pospisil;Michael T. Bardo

  • A novel mechanism of action and potential use for lobeline as a treatment for psychostimulant abuse.

    Linda P. Dwoskin;Peter A. Crooks

  • Persistence of neurochemical changes in dopamine systems after repeated cocaine administration.

    J. Peris;S. J. Boyson;W. A. Cass;P. Curella

  • Prefrontal cortex and drug abuse vulnerability: translation to prevention and treatment interventions.

    Jennifer L. Perry;Jane E. Joseph;Yang Jiang;Rick S. Zimmerman;Rick S. Zimmerman

  • Obesity: Current and potential pharmacotherapeutics and targets.

    Vidya Narayanaswami;Linda P. Dwoskin

  • Environmental enrichment attenuates locomotor sensitization, but not in vitro dopamine release, induced by amphetamine

    M.T Bardo;S.L Bowling;J.K Rowlett;P Manderscheid

  • Lobeline attenuates d-methamphetamine self-administration in rats.

    Steven B. Harrod;Linda P. Dwoskin;Peter A. Crooks;Jennifer E. Klebaur

  • Lobeline and nicotine evoke [3H]overflow from rat striatal slices preloaded with [3H]dopamine: differential inhibition of synaptosomal and vesicular [3H]dopamine uptake.

    Lihong Teng;Peter A. Crooks;Patricia K. Sonsalla;Linda P. Dwoskin

  • Competitive Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Antagonists: A New Direction for Drug Discovery

    Linda P. Dwoskin;Peter A. Crooks

  • Vesicular monoamine transporter 2: role as a novel target for drug development.

    Guangrong Zheng;Linda P. Dwoskin;Peter A. Crooks

  • Nornicotine is self-administered intravenously by rats

    M. T. Bardo;Thomas Green;P. A. Crooks;L. P. Dwoskin

  • (S)-(-)-Cotinine, the major brain metabolite of nicotine, stimulates nicotinic receptors to evoke [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices in a calcium-dependent manner.

    Linda P. Dwoskin;Lihong Teng;Susan T. Buxton;Peter A. Crooks

  • Environmental enrichment decreases cell surface expression of the dopamine transporter in rat medial prefrontal cortex.

    Jun Zhu;Subbu Apparsundaram;Michael T. Bardo;Linda P. Dwoskin

  • Lobeline Inhibits the Neurochemical and Behavioral Effects of Amphetamine

    Dennis K. Miller;Peter A. Crooks;Lihong Teng;Jeffrey M. Witkin

  • Contribution of CNS Nicotine Metabolites to the Neuropharmacological Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco Smoking

    Peter A. Crooks;Linda P. Dwoskin

  • Lobeline displaces [3H]dihydrotetrabenazine binding and releases [3H]dopamine from rat striatal synaptic vesicles: comparison with d-amphetamine.

    LiHong Teng;Peter A. Crooks;Linda P. Dwoskin

  • Accumulation of nicotine and its metabolites in rat brain after intermittent or continuous peripheral administration of [2'-14C]nicotine

    Omar A. Ghosheh;Linda P. Dwoskin;Dennis K. Miller;Peter A. Crooks

  • Residence Times and Half-Lives of Nicotine Metabolites in Rat Brain after Acute Peripheral Administration of [2′-14C]Nicotine

    Omar Ghosheh;Linda P. Dwoskin;Wen-Kui Li;Peter A. Crooks

  • A pilot study of plasma caffeine concentrations in a US sample of smoker and nonsmoker volunteers

    Jose de Leon;Francisco J Diaz;Thea Rogers;Debra Browne

  • Robust modulation of [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices by D-2 dopamine receptors.

    L P Dwoskin;N R Zahniser

  • Effect of bupropion on nicotine self-administration in rats

    Anthony S. Rauhut;Anthony S. Rauhut;Nicole Neugebauer;Linda P. Dwoskin;Michael T. Bardo

  • Repeated cocaine administration results in supersensitivity of striatal D-2 dopamine autoreceptors to pergolide

    Linda P. Dwoskin;Joanna Peris;Robert P. Yasuda;Katie Philpott

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter A. Crooks
Peter A. Crooks University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Michael T. Bardo
Michael T. Bardo University of Kentucky
Kathleen M. Kantak
Kathleen M. Kantak Boston University
Chang-Guo Zhan
Chang-Guo Zhan University of Kentucky
Lisa A. Cassis
Lisa A. Cassis University of Kentucky
Thomas A. Green
Thomas A. Green The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Nancy R. Zahniser
Nancy R. Zahniser University of Colorado Denver
J. Michael McIntosh
J. Michael McIntosh University of Utah
Roger L. Papke
Roger L. Papke University of Florida
Sean Parkin
Sean Parkin University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Neuroscience but exploring alternative or complementary paths? Many students consider which degrees make the most money as they plan their education. Fields like biomedical engineering, computer science, and pharmacy often appear on these lists, and can combine well with neuroscience expertise.

For those seeking more flexible options, online learning opens many doors. There are online colleges that take financial aid, making it easier to pursue your degree without overwhelming debt. Community colleges and four-year schools alike now offer fully remote programs in psychology, biology, and health sciences.

Shorter-term training is also available. Many online certificate programs that pay well are excellent for boosting skills or breaking into a new area like data analysis, health informatics, or lab technology.

If balancing school and work is a concern, consider choosing from the easiest degree to get online. Options include general studies, business administration, or health science, each of which can provide a strong foundation for neuroscience-adjacent careers.

Best Scientists Citing Linda P. Dwoskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles