World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathleen M. Kantak

Kathleen M. Kantak

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3104
World Ranking
11012
National Ranking
5739

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4112
World Ranking
9231
National Ranking
3896

Kathleen M. Kantak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen M. Kantak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kathleen M. Kantak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen M. Kantak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathleen M. Kantak is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and focuses primarily on neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, molecular biology, and physiology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals
  • Receptor mechanisms and signaling
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Bioinformatics and genomic networks

Kantak has contributed to a number of publications in well-known scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Trends in Genetics
  • Neurobiology of Aging

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kantak include:

  • Rodent models of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: An updated framework for model validation and therapeutic drug discovery (2022) in Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Adolescent-onset vs. adult-onset cocaine use: Impact on cognitive functioning in animal models and opportunities for translation (2020) in Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Facilitating Complex Trait Analysis via Reduced Complexity Crosses (2020) in Trends in Genetics

Other papers related to Kantak's collaborative environment include:

  • Facilitative effects of environmental enrichment for cocaine relapse prevention are dependent on extinction training context and involve increased TrkB signaling in dorsal hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (2020) in Behavioural Brain Research
  • Aging-induced microbleeds of the mouse thalamus compared to sensorimotor and memory defects (2020) in Neurobiology of Aging

Kantak frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Camron D. Bryant
  • Elon Mathieson
  • Heng-Ye Man
  • Jamie M. Gauthier
  • Carissa Stots

The scope of Kantak's research engages with detailed mechanisms of neurotransmitter receptors affecting behavior, neural memory processes, and the genetic underpinnings related to animal and plant diversity. Their work integrates experimental models in cognitive neuroscience and molecular neuroscience with applications important to understanding pharmacological effects and therapeutic strategies.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of a therapeutic cocaine vaccine in rodent models

    Barbara S. Fox;Kathleen M. Kantak;Melissa A. Edwards;Kerry M. Black

  • Dissociable effects of lidocaine inactivation of the rostral and caudal basolateral amygdala on the maintenance and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats.

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Yolanda Black;Eric Valencia;Kristen Green-Jordan

  • Evaluation of anti-cocaine antibodies and a cocaine vaccine in a rat self-administration model.

    K. M. Kantak;S. L. Collins;E. G. Lipman;J. Bond

  • Combined Pharmacotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Medication Effects, Glucocorticoids, and Attenuated Treatment Outcomes

    Michael W. Otto;R. Kathryn McHugh;Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Context-dependent prefrontal cortex regulation of cocaine self-administration and reinstatement behaviors in rats.

    Nina C. Di Pietro;Yolanda D. Black;Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Advancing the spontaneous hypertensive rat model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    K. M. Kantak;T. Singh;K. A. Kerstetter;K. A. Dembro

  • D-cycloserine deters reacquisition of cocaine self-administration by augmenting extinction learning.

    Bríd Á Nic Dhonnchadha;Jonathan J Szalay;Cindy Achat-Mendes;Donna M Platt

  • Methylphenidate treatment in adolescent rats with an attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder phenotype: cocaine addiction vulnerability and dopamine transporter function.

    Roxann C Harvey;Sucharita Sen;Agripina Deaciuc;Linda P Dwoskin

  • Hippocampal memory system function and the regulation of cocaine self-administration behavior in rats

    Yolanda D Black;Kristen Green-Jordan;Howard B Eichenbaum;Kathleen M Kantak

  • Time course of changes in cocaine self-administration behavior in rats during immunization with the cocaine vaccine IPC-1010

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Stephanie L. Collins;Julian Bond;Barbara S. Fox

  • Effects of dietary supplements and a tryptophan-free diet on aggressive behavior in rats.

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Linda R. Hegstrand;James Whitman;Burr Eichelman

  • Vaccines against drugs of abuse: a viable treatment option?

    Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Cognitive task performance after lidocaine-induced inactivation of different sites within the basolateral amygdala and dorsal striatum.

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Kristen Green-Jordan;Eric Valencia;Terry Kremin

  • Facilitation of shock-induced fighting following intraventricular 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine and 6-hydroxydopa.

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Linda R. Hegstrand;Burr Eichelman

  • Interaction of the rostral basolateral amygdala and prelimbic prefrontal cortex in regulating reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

    Yasmin Mashhoon;Audrey M. Wells;Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Magnesium deficiency alters aggressive behavior and catecholamine function.

    Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Cognitive enhancers for facilitating drug cue extinction: insights from animal models.

    Bríd Áine Nic Dhonnchadha;Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Influence of sex, estrous cycle, and drug-onset age on cocaine self-administration in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

    Kathleen M Kantak;Claudia M Goodrich;Valeria Uribe

  • Complementary tasks to measure working memory in distinct prefrontal cortex subregions in rats.

    Nina C. Di Pietro;Yolanda D. Black;Kristen Green-Jordan;Howard B. Eichenbaum

  • Hippocampal regulation of contextual cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

    Alison Lynn Atkins;Yasmin Mashhoon;Kathleen M Kantak

  • Dietary tryptophan reversal of septal lesion and 5,7-DHT lesion elicited shock-induced fighting.

    Kathleen M. Kantak;Linda R. Hegstrand;Burr Eichelman

  • Effects of serotonin receptor agonists and antagonists on offensive aggression in mice

    Tone Lindgren;Kathleen M. Kantak

  • Differential effects of self-administered cocaine in adolescent and adult rats on stimulus-reward learning.

    Kerry A. Kerstetter;Kathleen M. Kantak

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda P. Dwoskin
Linda P. Dwoskin University of Kentucky
Howard Eichenbaum
Howard Eichenbaum Boston University
Heng-Ye Man
Heng-Ye Man Boston University
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Michael T. Bardo
Michael T. Bardo University of Kentucky
Michael Otto
Michael Otto National Institutes of Health
Klaus A. Miczek
Klaus A. Miczek Tufts University
R. Kathryn McHugh
R. Kathryn McHugh Harvard University
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University
Robert W. Williams
Robert W. Williams University of Tennessee Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are several online degree paths that complement or expand your career options. Psychology is a closely related field, and students seeking a cost-effective route may be interested in the cheapest online psychology degree programs.

For those focused on mental health careers, a graduate degree can open more opportunities. An online master's in social work prepares students for roles in counseling, advocacy, and clinical work. If you wish to practice as a psychologist, pursuing a psyd psychology online degree could be an effective option to gain practical, clinical skills.

Alternatively, those passionate about family therapy and relational dynamics should consider lmft online programs, which can lead to licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist. All these online programs offer flexible learning, but it’s important to review admission requirements, accreditation, and career outcomes before making a choice.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen M. Kantak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles