World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
24411
World Ranking
12836
National Ranking
6563

James H. Woods publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Woods sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 550 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James H. Woods D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Woods sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James H. Woods is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research intersects multiple scientific domains, including Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader areas, Woods has contributed to several specialized subfields such as:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Molecular Biology
  • Information Systems

Their research topics span diverse areas including:

  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • 14-3-3 protein interactions
  • Microbial metabolism and enzyme function

James H. Woods's publication record includes papers in recognized scientific venues. Notably, their recent work published in 2023 is:

  • "Abstract 1249: 14-3-3 binding stabilizes and sequesters PTOV1 to the cytoplasm during G1" (Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2023)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Katie L. Pennington
  • Colten M. McEwan
  • Colin Muir
  • A.G. Pramoda Sahankumari
  • Riley J. Eastmond

James H. Woods's primary publication venue is the Journal of Biological Chemistry, where they have published at least one paper.

Best Publications

  • Benzodiazepines: use, abuse, and consequences.

    J H Woods;J L Katz;G Winger

  • MK-801, a proposed noncompetitive antagonist of excitatory amino acid neurotransmission, produces phencyclidine-like behavioral effects in pigeons, rats and rhesus monkeys.

    W Koek;J H Woods;G D Winger

  • Abuse liability of benzodiazepines.

    J H Woods;J L Katz;G Winger

  • Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance

    C. R. Schuster;W. S. Dockens;J. H. Woods

  • Classification and nomenclature of phencyclidine and sigma receptor sites

    Rémi Quirion;Robert Chicheportiche;Patricia C. Contreras;Kenneth M. Johnson

  • Effects of Buprenorphine Maintenance Dose on μ -Opioid Receptor Availability, Plasma Concentrations, and Antagonist Blockade in Heroin-Dependent Volunteers

    Mark K. Greenwald;Chris Ellyn Johanson;David E. Moody;James H. Woods

  • Binding affinity and selectivity of opioids at mu, delta and kappa receptors in monkey brain membranes.

    P. J. Emmerson;Man-Ru Liu;J. H. Woods;F. Medzihradsky

  • Nonpeptidic δ-opioid Receptor Agonists Reduce Immobility in the Forced Swim Assay in Rats

    Daniel C Broom;Emily M Jutkiewicz;John E Folk;John R Traynor

  • Current benzodiazepine issues

    James H. Woods;Gail D. Winger

  • A catalytic antibody against cocaine prevents cocaine’s reinforcing and toxic effects in rats

    Berend Mets;Gail Winger;Camilo Cabrera;Susan Seo

  • Reinforcement Properties of Morphine, Cocaine, and SPA as a Function of Unit Dose

    James H. Woods;Charles R. Schuster

  • Most Efficient Cocaine Hydrolase Designed by Virtual Screening of Transition States

    Fang Zheng;Wenchao Yang;Mei Chuan Ko;Junjun Liu

  • Characterization of opioid agonist efficacy in a C6 glioma cell line expressing the mu opioid receptor.

    P J Emmerson;M J Clark;A Mansour;H Akil

  • IV. DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS EFFECTS OF NARCOTICS: EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE RECEPTOR-MEDIATED ACTIONS

    Seymore Herling;James H. Woods

  • Genetic variance in nociception and its relationship to the potency of morphine-induced analgesia in thermal and chemical tests

    Gregory I Elmer;Jeanne O Pieper;S Stevens Negus;James H Woods

  • The treatment of chronic insomnia: drug indications, chronic use and abuse liability. Summary of a 2001 New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit meeting symposium.

    Wallace B. Mendelson;Thomas Roth;James Cassella;Timothy Roehrs;Timothy Roehrs

  • The Conditioned Reinforcing Effects of Stimuli Associated with Morphine Reinforcement

    Charles R. Schuster;James H. Woods

  • Convulsive effects of systemic administration of the delta opioid agonist BW373U86 in mice.

    S. D. Comer;E. M. Hoenicke;A. I. Sable;R. W. Mcnutt

  • 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") and its stereoisomers as reinforcers in rhesus monkeys: serotonergic involvement

    William E. Fantegrossi;Thomas Ullrich;Kenner C. Rice;James H. Woods

  • The reinforcing property of ethanol in the rhesus monkey. I. Initiation, maintenance and termination of intravenous ethanol-reinforced responding.

    Gail D. Winger;James H. Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenner C. Rice
Kenner C. Rice National Institutes of Health
Roger K. Sunahara
Roger K. Sunahara University of California, San Diego
Jonathan L. Katz
Jonathan L. Katz National Institute on Drug Abuse
Wouter Koek
Wouter Koek The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Rita J. Valentino
Rita J. Valentino National Institute on Drug Abuse
John J. G. Tesmer
John J. G. Tesmer Purdue University West Lafayette
John E. Folk
John E. Folk National Institutes of Health
Michael R. Kilbourn
Michael R. Kilbourn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anne B. Young
Anne B. Young Harvard University
Henry I. Mosberg
Henry I. Mosberg University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional on-campus programs. There are a variety of online degrees and alternative pathways that can help you enter or advance in this field. For instance, those seeking to step into nursing may consider adn nursing programs as a more accessible entry point.

Already an RN? Advancing your credentials is achievable with most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs, designed for working professionals who want to broaden their career opportunities without sacrificing flexibility.

For those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, there are non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs, which provide a fast track to a master’s degree and prepare you for advanced practice or leadership roles.

If you're aiming for the highest academic achievement, consider pursuing an online phd in nursing. This pathway is ideal for those interested in research, academia, or executive positions within the healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles