World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
14170
World Ranking
4260
National Ranking
2008

Gary M. Olson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Olson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 172 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gary M. Olson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Olson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to computer-supported collaborative work.

Overview

Gary M. Olson is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research covers topics primarily related to healthcare policy, primary care and health outcomes, and ethics in clinical research. These topics have been addressed across multiple publications and research projects.

The scientist has contributed to two recent papers:

  • Compliant Self Service Access to Secondary Use Clinical Data at Stanford Medicine, 2024, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Distant Work, 2021, published in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • S. Weber
  • Joseph Pallas
  • David W. Love
  • Sanjay Malunjkar
  • Srinivasan Boosi

Gary M. Olson's research has appeared in the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology

Their work spans subfields such as economics and econometrics, general health professions, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Among the recognitions received, Gary M. Olson was named an ACM Fellow in 2007 for contributions to computer-supported collaborative work.

Best Publications

  • Distance matters

    Gary M. Olson;Judith S. Olson

  • Encapsulated, streaming media automation and distribution system

    Lynn T. Rowe;John A. Heinen;Peter A. Ernst;Gary H. Olson

  • Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development

    Nathan Bos;Judy Olson;Darren Gergle;Gary Olson

  • The growth of cognitive modeling in human-computer interaction since GOMS

    Judith Reitman Olson;Gary M. Olson

  • Small group design meetings: an analysis of collaboration

    Gary M. Olson;Judith S. Olson;Mark R. Carter;Marianne Storrøsten

  • Thinking-Out-Loud as a Method for Studying Real-Time Comprehension Processes

    Gary M. Olson;Susan A. Duffy;Robert L. Mack

  • From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration

    Thomas A. Finholt;Gary M. Olson

  • From Shared Databases to Communities of Practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories

    Nathan Bos;Ann Zimmerman;Judith S. Olson;Jude Yew

  • Human-computer interaction: psychological aspects of the human use of computing.

    Gary M. Olson;Judith S. Olson

  • Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities

    Jun Zheng;Elizabeth Veinott;Nathan Bos;Judith S. Olson

  • Scientific Collaboration on the Internet

    Gary M. Olson;Ann Zimmerman;Nathan Bos

  • Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other

    Elizabeth S. Veinott;Judith Olson;Gary M. Olson;Xiaolan Fu

  • What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work?

    Judith S. Olson;Gary M. Olson;David K. Meader

  • Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor

    Judith S. Olson;Gary M. Olson;Marianne Storrøsten;Mark Carter

  • User‐centered design of collaboration technology

    Gary M. Olson;Judith S. Olson

  • Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design

    Mathilde M. Bekker;Judith S. Olson;Gary M. Olson

  • Cognitive aspects of genre

    Gary M. Olson;Robert L. Mack;Susan A. Duffy

  • Culture Surprises in Remote Software Development Teams: When in Rome doesn’t help when your team crosses time zones, and your deadline doesn’t.

    Judith S. Olson;Gary M. Olson

  • Object-oriented system development in a banking project: methodology, experience, and conclusions

    James D. Herbsleb;Helen Klein;Gary M. Olson;Hans Brunner

  • Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop

    Gary M. Olson;Sylvia Sheppard;Elliot Soloway

Frequent Co-Authors

James D. Herbsleb
James D. Herbsleb Carnegie Mellon University
Atul Prakash
Atul Prakash University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gina Venolia
Gina Venolia Microsoft (United States)
Timothy L Killeen
Timothy L Killeen National Center for Atmospheric Research
Thomas P. Moran
Thomas P. Moran IBM (United States)
Toru Ishida
Toru Ishida Hong Kong Baptist University
Elliot Soloway
Elliot Soloway University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Darren Gergle
Darren Gergle Northwestern University
mc schraefel
mc schraefel University of Southampton
Jonathan Grudin
Jonathan Grudin University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees, each supporting unique career pathways. Students seeking an interdisciplinary approach can consider an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online. This degree blends technology with sustainability, preparing graduates for careers in environmental solutions.

For those interested in designing and building, a mechanical engineering degree online cost comparison can help you find affordable options that lead to high-demand, well-paid engineering roles.

If physics piques your interest, an online bachelor's degree in physics provides foundational knowledge in scientific problem-solving, essential for careers in research, teaching, or tech development.

Students interested in big data may opt for data science programs. These programs are perfect for those seeking roles as data analysts, machine learning engineers, or AI specialists.

Each of these online degrees offers flexible options to help you launch a specialized technology career alongside computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Gary M. Olson

Trending Scientists