World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9529
World Ranking
7494
National Ranking
446

mc schraefel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where mc schraefel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 260 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

mc schraefel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where mc schraefel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

mc schraefel is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science and Psychology, with significant contributions in Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's recent publications cover diverse topics, reflecting their interdisciplinary approach. Key papers include:

  • "Privacy and Trust in the Internet of Vehicles," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • "Automated privacy negotiations with preference uncertainty," 2022, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • "Wearable nanocomposite kinesiology tape for distributed muscle engagement monitoring," 2021, MRS Advances
  • "Inbodied Interaction: Introduction," 2020, interactions
  • "Tuning," 2020, interactions

Their work often explores topics related to innovative human-technology interaction, privacy, security, and data protection, as well as privacy-preserving technologies in data. Research also extends into advanced sensor and energy harvesting materials, muscle activation and electromyography studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with mc schraefel include:

  • Josh Andrés
  • Christoph Tremmel
  • Enrico Gerding
  • Michael Jones
  • Richard Gomer

The scientist has contributed to many publications in respected venues, with recurring appearances in:

  • interactions
  • Frontiers in Computer Science
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

mc schraefel's work integrates elements from social psychology and experimental psychology, applying these perspectives to fields such as human-computer interaction and cognitive neuroscience. Their publications reflect an emphasis on multidisciplinary research addressing both technological and psychological aspects of privacy, sensor technologies, and interactive systems.

Best Publications

  • Introduction

    Unknown

  • Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk

    N. Shadbolt;K. O'Hara;T. Berners-Lee;N. Gibbins

  • Supporting Exploratory Search, Introduction, Special Issue, Communications of the ACM

    Ryen W. White;Bill Kules;Steven M. Drucker;m.c. schraefel

  • Supporting exploratory search

    Ryen W. White;Bill Kules;Steven M. Drucker;M. C. Schraefel

  • Trust me, i'm partially right: incremental visualization lets analysts explore large datasets faster

    Danyel Fisher;Igor Popov;Steven Drucker;m.c. schraefel

  • A Taxonomy of Gestures in Human Computer Interactions

    Maria Karam;m. c. schraefel

  • Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity

    Paul André;m.c. schraefel;Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais

  • Reducing legacy bias in gesture elicitation studies

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Andreea Danielescu;Steven Drucker;Danyel Fisher

  • Information scraps: How and why information eludes our personal information management tools

    Michael Bernstein;Max Van Kleek;David Karger;M. C. Schraefel

  • Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers' Personal Data Presentations

    Eun Kyoung Choe;Bongshin Lee;m.c. schraefel

  • mSpace: improving information access to multimedia domains with multimodal exploratory search

    m.c. schraefel;Max Wilson;Alistair Russell;Daniel A. Smith

  • Evaluating advanced search interfaces using established information-seeking models

    Max L. Wilson;M. C. schraefel;Ryen W. White

  • Continuum: designing timelines for hierarchies, relationships and scale

    Paul André;Max L. Wilson;Alistair Russell;Daniel A. Smith

  • Hunter gatherer: interaction support for the creation and management of within-web-page collections

    M. C. schraefel;Yuxiang Zhu;David Modjeska;Daniel Wigdor

  • CS AKTive Space or how we stopped worrying and learned to love the Semantic Web

    Nigel R. Shadbolt;Nicholas Gibbins;Hugh Glaser;Stephen Harris

  • TouchViz: a case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets

    Steven M. Drucker;Danyel Fisher;Ramik Sadana;Jessica Herron

  • The evolving mSpace platform: leveraging the semantic web on the trail of the memex

    m. c. schraefel;Daniel A. Smith;Alisdair Owens;Alistair Russell

  • CS AKTive Space, or how we learned to stop worrying and love the semantic Web

    N. Shadbolt;N. Gibbins;H. Glaser;S. Harris

  • A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities

    Nađa Terzimehić;Renate Häuslschmid;Heinrich Hussmann;m.c. schraefel

  • Clustered TDB: A Clustered Triple Store for Jena

    Alisdair Owens;Andy Seaborne;Nick Gibbins;mc schraefel

  • Breaking the book: translating the chemistry lab book into a pervasive computing lab environment

    m. c. schraefel;Gareth V. Hughes;Hugo R. Mills;Graham Smith

  • The Pathetic Fallacy of RDF

    m.c. schraefel;David Karger

  • User-controlled link adaptation

    Theophanis Tsandilas;m. c. schraefel

Frequent Co-Authors

Max Van Kleek
Max Van Kleek University of Oxford
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Enrico H. Gerding
Enrico H. Gerding University of Southampton
Ryen W. White
Ryen W. White Microsoft (United States)
Graham Smith
Graham Smith University of Westminster
Alan Dix
Alan Dix Swansea University
Cliff Lampe
Cliff Lampe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gloria Mark
Gloria Mark University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA unlocks diverse opportunities, but it's not the only path. Many students explore alternatives such as associate, master’s, or doctoral programs online to fit learning into their schedules and budgets.

Entry-level options like easy associate degrees that pay well can provide a quick, cost-effective launch into tech-related fields. For those interested in leadership or advanced roles, you might consider the cheapest online masters degree options. These programs can help you grow specialized skills and improve long-term earning potential.

If your interests lean toward education or organizational change, exploring a cheapest online edd programs or a phd in leadership online could open up new career pathways in academia and executive management.

Online degree programs offer flexibility, affordability, and a variety of specializations—making it easier than ever to tailor your education to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing mc schraefel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles