World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 53 2205 2007 1061 954 132 42082

Cliff Lampe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cliff Lampe between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cliff Lampe published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 8 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
2004 2025

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cliff Lampe: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 5
2007 6
2008 5
2009 5
2010 7
2011 12
2012 15
2013 17
2014 10
2015 10
2016 12
2017 10
2018 8
2019 0
2020 4
2021 1
2022 5
2023 2
2024 6
2025 2
Total 144
Download as CSV

Cliff Lampe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cliff Lampe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 132 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 132
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Cliff Lampe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cliff Lampe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141 53
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Cliff Lampe is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected disciplines, with a primary focus on social sciences and computer science. The subfields they have contributed to include sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, communication, social psychology, and safety research.

Their work covers a range of topics in social media and political contexts, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, bullying, victimization, and aggression, privacy, security, and data protection, the impact of technology on adolescents, ethics and social impacts of AI, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).

Notable recent publications by Cliff Lampe include:

  • Privacy in Interaction: Exploring Disclosure and Social Capital in Facebook (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking Theory (2022), 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
  • Online Harassment: Assessing Harms and Remedies (2023), Social Media + Society
  • Interpretability Gone Bad: The Role of Bounded Rationality in How Practitioners Understand Machine Learning (2024), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequently collaborating researchers include Sarita Schoenebeck, Jessica Vitak, Nicole B. Ellison, Rebecca Gray, and Harmanpreet Kaur. Among the venues where Cliff Lampe has consistently published are the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Social Media + Society, and the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts.

Cliff Lampe was recognized as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2018.

Best Publications

  • The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites

    Nicole B. Ellison;Charles Steinfield;Cliff Lampe

  • Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis

    Charles Steinfield;Nicole B. Ellison;Cliff Lampe

  • Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebook-enabled Communication Practices

    Nicole B. Ellison;Charles Steinfield;Cliff Lampe

  • A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing

    Cliff Lampe;Nicole Ellison;Charles Steinfield

  • Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Jofish Kaye;Allison Druin;Cliff Lampe;Dan Morris

  • Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use

    Andrew D. Smock;Nicole B. Ellison;Cliff Lampe;Donghee Yvette Wohn

  • Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes

    Nicole B. Ellison;Jessica Vitak;Rebecca Gray;Cliff Lampe

  • A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network

    Cliff A.C. Lampe;Nicole Ellison;Charles Steinfield

  • It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election

    Jessica Vitak;Paul Zube;Andrew D. Smock;Caleb T. Carr

  • Changes in use and perception of facebook

    Cliff Lampe;Nicole B. Ellison;Charles Steinfield

  • Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space

    Cliff Lampe;Paul Resnick

  • Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities

    Cliff Lampe;Donghee Yvette Wohn;Jessica Vitak;Nicole B. Ellison

  • Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization

    Charles Steinfield;Joan M. DiMicco;Nicole B. Ellison;Cliff Lampe

  • Motivations to participate in online communities

    Cliff Lampe;Rick Wash;Alcides Velasquez;Elif Ozkaya

  • Negotiating Privacy Concerns and Social Capital Needs in a Social Media Environment

    Nicole B. Ellison;Jessica Vitak;Charles Steinfield;Rebecca Gray

  • The ties that bind: Social network principles in online communities

    Dale Ganley;Cliff Lampe

  • With a Little Help From My Friends: How Social Network Sites Affect Social Capital Processes

    Nicole B . Ellison;Cliff Lampe;Charles Steinfield

  • FEATURESocial network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities

    Nicole B. Ellison;Cliff Lampe;Charles Steinfield

  • Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community

    Cliff Lampe;Erik Johnston

  • Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Gloria Mark;Susan Fussell;Cliff Lampe;m.c. schraefel

  • Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob

    Lindsay Blackwell;Jill Dimond;Sarita Schoenebeck;Cliff Lampe

  • Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work

    Amy Bruckman;Scott Counts;Cliff Lampe;Loren Terveen

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicole B. Ellison
Nicole B. Ellison University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jessica Vitak
Jessica Vitak University of Maryland, College Park
Charles Steinfield
Charles Steinfield Michigan State University
Loren Terveen
Loren Terveen University of Minnesota
Donghee Yvette Wohn
Donghee Yvette Wohn New Jersey Institute of Technology
Juan Pablo Hourcade
Juan Pablo Hourcade University of Iowa
Susan R. Fussell
Susan R. Fussell Cornell University
Amy Bruckman
Amy Bruckman Georgia Institute of Technology
mc schraefel
mc schraefel University of Southampton
Gloria Mark
Gloria Mark University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a diverse range of academic and career options. Many universities now offer accelerated online programs, allowing students to earn a degree faster and with greater flexibility. For those interested in advancing their careers quickly, you can find one year masters programs across fields like sociology, communication, and history. These programs help students build expertise without a lengthy time commitment.

If you aim for a terminal degree in education, there are numerous edd online programs designed to be completed in less time. Psychology remains a popular specialization; students seeking affordability and flexibility can explore an online psychology masters to jumpstart roles in counseling, research, or human services.

For undergraduates, accelerated programs provide a way to complete your bachelor's degree at a faster pace, which can save money and allow for quicker entry into the workforce. These flexible online pathways allow students to customize their education to fit both their career aspirations and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Cliff Lampe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles