World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 60 3221 3127 1564 1506 189 15477

Amy Bruckman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy Bruckman between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy Bruckman published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2022. 10 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2022. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
1991 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy Bruckman: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 1
1996 5
1997 3
1998 2
1999 7
2000 4
2001 6
2002 13
2003 1
2004 6
2005 7
2006 8
2007 10
2008 12
2009 11
2010 8
2011 7
2012 9
2013 9
2014 7
2015 5
2016 4
2017 8
2018 11
2019 9
2020 3
2021 4
2022 16
2023 5
2024 8
2025 2
Total 216
Download as CSV

Amy Bruckman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Bruckman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 189 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583 189
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy Bruckman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Bruckman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337 60
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Fellow For contributions to collaborative computing and foundational work in Internet research ethics.
  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Amy Bruckman is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Computer Science, with a significant focus on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, and Computer Science Applications.

The following main topics characterize their work:

  • Social Media and Politics
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

Amy Bruckman has published in multiple venues, notably:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Recent papers include:

  • "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on Twitter," 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit," 2022, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Will AI Console Me when I Lose my Pet? Understanding Perceptions of AI-Mediated Email Writing," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Exploring the Role of Grammar and Word Choice in Bias Toward African American English (AAE) in Hate Speech Classification," 2022, 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Diyi Yang
  • Xander Koo
  • Shagun Jhaver
  • Christian Boylston
  • Eshwar Chandrasekharan

Amy Bruckman has also contributed to book publications, including a title with Cambridge University Press:

  • "Should You Believe Wikipedia?", 2022

Awards received are:

  • ACM Fellow, 2018, for contributions to collaborative computing and foundational work in Internet research ethics
  • ACM Senior Member, 2009

Best Publications

  • Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet.

    Robert Kraut;Judith Olson;Mahzarin Banaji;Amy Bruckman

  • Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia

    Susan L. Bryant;Andrea Forte;Amy Bruckman

  • Gender swapping on the Internet

    Amy Bruckman

  • Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected inhuman subjects research on the Internet

    Amy Bruckman

  • Community Support for Constructionist Learning

    Amy Bruckman

  • Moose crossing: construction, community, and learning in a networked virtual world for kids

    Amy Susan Bruckman;Mitchel Resnick

  • The MediaMOO Project Constructionism and Professional Community

    Amy Bruckman;Mitchel Resnick

  • “Go Away”: Participant Objections to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research

    James M. Hudson;Amy S. Bruckman

  • Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits

    Mitchel Resnick;Amy Bruckman;Fred Martin

  • From Wikipedia to the classroom: exploring online publication and learning

    Andrea Forte;Amy Bruckman

  • The Internet's Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales

    Eshwar Chandrasekharan;Mattia Samory;Shagun Jhaver;Hunter Charvat

  • Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization

    Jill P. Dimond;Michaelanne Dye;Daphne Larose;Amy S. Bruckman

  • Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator

    Shagun Jhaver;Iris Birman;Eric Gilbert;Amy Bruckman

  • Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists

    Shagun Jhaver;Sucheta Ghoshal;Amy Bruckman;Eric Gilbert

  • Domestic violence and information communication technologies

    Jill P. Dimond;Casey Fiesler;Amy S. Bruckman

  • HCI FOR KIDS

    Amy Bruckman;Alisa Bandlow;Andrea Forte

  • Human-computer interaction for kids

    Amy Bruckman;Alisa Bandlow

  • Social and technical challenges in parenting teens' social media use

    Sarita Yardi;Amy Bruckman

  • Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance

    A. Forte;A. Bruckman

  • Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter?: User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit

    Shagun Jhaver;Amy Bruckman;Eric Gilbert

  • Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work

    Amy Bruckman;Scott Counts;Cliff Lampe;Loren Terveen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Forte
Andrea Forte University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric Gilbert
Eric Gilbert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cliff Lampe
Cliff Lampe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark Guzdial
Mark Guzdial University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Loren Terveen
Loren Terveen University of Minnesota
Allison Druin
Allison Druin University of Maryland, College Park
Robert E. Kraut
Robert E. Kraut Carnegie Mellon University
Barry Wellman
Barry Wellman University of Toronto
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible learning options. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing specialized degrees such as the best online physics degree, which combines fundamental science with computing and is increasingly offered online.

Another popular path is becoming a data scientist. Earning a data scientist degree can lead to high-demand roles in tech, finance, and healthcare. These programs emphasize skills like data analysis, machine learning, and critical problem solving.

If you’re interested in the intersection of hardware and software, an online electrical engineering career outcomes section demonstrates how this pathway leads to opportunities in sectors like robotics, telecommunications, and energy.

For those seeking fast entry into the job market or to boost their credentials, consider earning easy certifications to get. These programs can increase your employability with minimal time investment, covering areas like coding, cybersecurity, and IT support.

Ultimately, there are a wide range of online degree and certification options to support your computer science journey and career goals in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Bruckman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles