World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6986 6514 332 326 240 7623

Ulrike Cress publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrike Cress between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrike Cress published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2014. 8 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2014. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrike Cress: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 8
2008 11
2009 15
2010 9
2011 20
2012 11
2013 21
2014 27
2015 19
2016 25
2017 27
2018 18
2019 14
2020 11
2021 4
2022 3
2023 4
2024 6
2025 2
Total 264
Download as CSV

Ulrike Cress publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Cress sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 240 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 240
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrike Cress D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Cress sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ulrike Cress is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology, Social Sciences, and Computer Science, with a focus on various interdisciplinary subfields and topics.

Their main subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Education
  • Health Informatics

Key topics in Ulrike Cress's work are:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Topic Modeling
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Animal and Plant Science Education

They have contributed to several frequent publication venues, including:

  • International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Health Expectations
  • Education Sciences
  • Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Frequent co-authors in Ulrike Cress's publications include:

  • Joachim Kimmerle
  • Martina Bientzle
  • Jasmin Timm
  • Teresa Festl-Wietek
  • Anne Herrmann-Werner

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrike Cress are:

  • Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective (2023), published in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  • Digital Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Literature Review of the Role of Individual vs. Social Settings for Measuring Learning Outcomes (2020), published in Education Sciences
  • Toward learning progression analytics - Developing learning environments for the automated analysis of learning using evidence centered design (2022), published in Frontiers in Education
  • Medical Students' Attitudes Toward AI in Medicine and their Expectations for Medical Education (2023), published in Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
  • Elucidating the socio-demographics of wildlife tolerance using the example of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Germany (2020), published in Conservation Science and Practice

Best Publications

  • A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis

    Ulrike Cress;Joachim Kimmerle

  • The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress;Christoph Held

  • Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation

    Ursula Fischer;Korbinian Moeller;Martina Bientzle;Ulrike Cress

  • Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective.

    Joachim Kimmerle;Johannes Moskaliuk;Aileen Oeberst;Ulrike Cress

  • The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods

    Ulrike Cress

  • Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines

    Ulrike Cress;Vania Dimitrova;Marcus Specht

  • Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: effects of incongruity between knowledge and information

    Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Learning and development of embodied numerosity.

    Korbinian Moeller;Ursula Fischer;Tanja Link;Mirjam Wasner

  • Virtual training

    Johanna Bertram;Johannes Moskaliuk;Ulrike Cress

  • Information Exchange With Shared Databases as a Social Dilemma The Effect of Metaknowledge, Bonus Systems, and Costs

    Ulrike Cress;Joachim Kimmerle;Friedrich W. Hesse

  • Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups.

    Aemilian Hron;Friedrich W. Hesse;Ulrike Cress;Christos Giovis

  • Reflection as a catalyst for organisational learning

    Kristin Knipfer;Barbara Kump;Daniel Wessel;Ulrike Cress

  • Using Wikis for Learning and Knowledge Building: Results of an Experimental Study.

    Joachim Kimmerle;Johannes Moskaliuk;Ulrike Cress

  • Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity

    Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Knowledge exchange using Web 2.0 technologies in NGOs

    Christina Matschke;Johannes Moskaliuk;Ulrike Cress

  • An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?)

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress;Friedrich W. Hesse

  • Preference-inconsistent recommendations: An effective approach for reducing confirmation bias and stimulating divergent thinking?

    Christina Schwind;Jürgen Buder;Ulrike Cress;Friedrich W. Hesse

  • The collective knowledge of social tags: Direct and indirect influences on navigation, learning, and information processing

    Ulrike Cress;Christoph Held;Joachim Kimmerle

  • The social psychology of knowledge management

    Joachim Kimmerle;Katrin Wodzicki;Ulrike Cress

Frequent Co-Authors

Joachim Kimmerle
Joachim Kimmerle University of Tübingen
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Nancy Law
Nancy Law University of Hong Kong
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Carolyn Penstein Rosé
Carolyn Penstein Rosé Carnegie Mellon University
Gerry Stahl
Gerry Stahl Drexel University
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Steffen Nestler
Steffen Nestler University of Münster
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Mitja D. Back
Mitja D. Back University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology online opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. Psychology is a diverse field, and students can choose from many psychology branches such as clinical, counseling, forensic, and child psychology. Each branch offers unique career opportunities, from working one-on-one with clients to conducting vital research.

For those interested in direct patient care, it's important to understand what degree do most clinical psychologists need. Typically, a doctoral degree is required to practice as a clinical psychologist in the USA, but some positions are available at the master’s level.

If you are passionate about helping young people, there are many careers in child and adolescent psychology. These roles range from school counselors to specialists in behavior intervention. Wondering what can you do with a child psychology degree? You could work in educational settings, mental health clinics, or even develop programs for community organizations. Online psychology degrees provide flexible pathways for these dynamic careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Cress

Trending Scientists