World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ann-Christine Ehlis

Ann-Christine Ehlis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2622 2404 110 107 251 14050
Neuroscience 67 2908 2659 250 233 258 14238

Ann-Christine Ehlis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann-Christine Ehlis between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann-Christine Ehlis published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2013. 20 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2013. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications
2003 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann-Christine Ehlis: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 5
2005 11
2006 12
2007 16
2008 6
2009 16
2010 8
2011 7
2012 9
2013 21
2014 15
2015 17
2016 10
2017 14
2018 17
2019 18
2020 12
2021 16
2022 11
2023 7
2024 9
2025 11
Total 271
Download as CSV

Ann-Christine Ehlis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann-Christine Ehlis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 251
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann-Christine Ehlis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann-Christine Ehlis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ann-Christine Ehlis is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Their work encompasses subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their research include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, heart rate variability and autonomic control, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, mental health research topics, and optical imaging and spectroscopy techniques.

Ann-Christine Ehlis has coauthored frequently with various researchers, including Andreas J. Fallgatter, David Rosenbaum, Agnes Kroczek, Isabell Int-Veen, and Beatrix Barth.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Predictors of neurofeedback training outcome: A systematic review, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Diminished prefrontal cortex activation in patients with binge eating disorder associates with trait impulsivity and improves after impulsivity-focused treatment based on a randomized controlled IMPULS trial, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Evidence of fNIRS-Based Prefrontal Cortex Hypoactivity in Obesity and Binge-Eating Disorder, 2020, Brain Sciences

They have frequently published in the following venues:

  • Scientific Reports
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Neurobiology of Stress
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Best Publications

  • Source localization (LORETA) of the error-related-negativity (ERN/Ne) and positivity (Pe).

    Martin J. Herrmann;Josefine Römmler;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Anke Heidrich

  • Event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): are the measurements reliable?

    Michael M. Plichta;Martin J. Herrmann;C. G. Baehne;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Biological Markers: Biological Markers in Depression

    Rainald Mössner;Olya Mikova;Eleni Koutsilieri;Mohamed Saoud

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Model-based analysis of rapid event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data: A parametric validation study

    Michael M. Plichta;Sebastian Heinzel;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Paul Pauli

  • Application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in psychiatry.

    Ann-Christine Ehlis;Sabrina Schneider;Thomas Dresler;Andreas J. Fallgatter

  • Simulation of near-infrared light absorption considering individual head and prefrontal cortex anatomy: implications for optical neuroimaging.

    Florian B. Haeussinger;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel;Tim Hahn;Tim Hahn;Martin Schecklmann

  • A neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS-I) haplotype associated with schizophrenia modifies prefrontal cortex function

    Reif A;Herterich S;Strobel A;Ehlis Ac

  • Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs).

    M. J. Herrmann;A.-C. Ehlis;H. Ellgring;A. J. Fallgatter

  • Reduced lateral prefrontal activation in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during a working memory task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

    Ann-Christine Ehlis;Christina G. Bähne;Christian P. Jacob;Martin J. Herrmann

  • Altered response control and anterior cingulate function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder boys

    Andreas J Fallgatter;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Juergen Seifert;Werner Konrad Strik

  • Frontal activation during a verbal-fluency task as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.

    M.J. Herrmann;A.-C. Ehlis;A.J. Fallgatter

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a long-term reliable tool for measuring brain activity during verbal fluency.

    Martin Schecklmann;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Michael M. Plichta;Andreas J. Fallgatter

  • Revise the revised? New dimensions of the neuroanatomical hypothesis of panic disorder

    Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Anne Guhn;Sara V. Tupak;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Far field potentials from the brain stem after transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation.

    A. J. Fallgatter;B. Neuhauser;M. J. Herrmann;A.-C. Ehlis

  • Influence of Functional Variant of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase on Impulsive Behaviors in Humans

    Andreas Reif;Christian P. Jacob;Dan Rujescu;Sabine Herterich

  • Cerebral oxygenation changes in the prefrontal cortex: Effects of age and gender

    M.J. Herrmann;A. Walter;A.-C. Ehlis;A.J. Fallgatter

  • The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.

    Tim Rohe;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Uta Noppeney

  • Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy detects specific inferior-frontal activation during incongruent Stroop trials.

    A.-C. Ehlis;M.J. Herrmann;A. Wagener;A.J. Fallgatter

  • Integrating neurobiological markers of depression.

    Tim Hahn;Andre F. Marquand;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Thomas Dresler

  • Source Localization of Early Stages of Face Processing

    Martin J. Herrmann;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Andreas Muehlberger;Andreas J. Fallgatter

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Thomas Dresler
Thomas Dresler University of Tübingen
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Michael M. Plichta
Michael M. Plichta Goethe University Frankfurt
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Klaus-Peter Lesch
Klaus-Peter Lesch University of Würzburg
Christian Jacob
Christian Jacob University of Würzburg
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Martin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann University of Regensburg
Paul Pauli
Paul Pauli University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Neuroscience opens doors to multiple career options, both in research and allied fields. Many students considering this path also explore highest paid college majors to maximize long-term earning potential. Professions connected to neuroscience, such as medical science, biotech, or pharmacology, often rank well for future salary prospects and job security.

With the rise of remote education, it’s now easier than ever to begin your journey through flexible study. For those needing tuition support, attending an online college that accepts fafsa can make earning a neuroscience or related degree more affordable.

If you’re seeking to specialize further or change careers, there are also online courses with certificates tailored to neuroscience topics and emerging technologies. While some neuroscience pathways are academically rigorous, students can start with an easiest degree to get in science or health to build foundational knowledge before progressing.

Best Scientists Citing Ann-Christine Ehlis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles