World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
9209
World Ranking
11013
National Ranking
4583

Alan R. Aronson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan R. Aronson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alan R. Aronson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan R. Aronson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan R. Aronson is a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their academic and research work is primarily connected to this institution, which is known for its focus on biomedical and health-related sciences.

There are no listed recent publications, co-authors, or specific venues where this scientist has frequently published. Similarly, no detailed information is available regarding their fields and subfields of study, main research topics, or book publications.

No awards or honors have been documented for Alan R. Aronson in the provided data set. There is also no indication that the scientist is deceased, so the current professional status is active or alive based on available information.

Best Publications

  • Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program

    Alan R. Aronson

  • An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances

    Alan R Aronson;François-Michel Lang

  • The NLM Indexing Initiative's Medical Text Indexer.

    Alan R. Aronson;James G. Mork;Susanne M. Humphrey

  • The NLM Indexing Initiative.

    Alan R. Aronson;Olivier Bodenreider;H. Florence Chang;Susanne M. Humphrey

  • Generating hypotheses by discovering implicit associations in the literature: a case report of a search for new potential therapeutic uses for thalidomide.

    Marc Weeber;Rein Vos;Henny Klein;Lolkje T. W. de Jong-van den Berg

  • Query expansion using the UMLS Metathesaurus.

    Alan R. Aronson;Thomas C. Rindflesch

  • Gene indexing: characterization and analysis of NLM's GeneRIFs.

    Joyce A. Mitchell;Alan R. Aronson;James G. Mork;Lillian C. Folk

  • MetaMap Lite: an evaluation of a new Java implementation of MetaMap

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Willie J Rogers;Alan R Aronson

  • Text-based discovery in biomedicine: The architecture of the DAD-system

    Marc Weeber;Henny Klein;Alan R. Aronson;James G. Mork

  • Developing a test collection for biomedical word sense disambiguation.

    Marc Weeber;James G. Mork;Alan R. Aronson

  • Exploiting a large thesaurus for information retrieval

    Alan R. Aronson;Thomas C. Rindflesch;Allen C. Browne

  • Mining molecular binding terminology from biomedical text.

    Thomas C. Rindflesch;Lawrence Hunter;Alan R. Aronson

  • UMLS knowledge for biomedical language processing.

    A T McCray;A R Aronson;A C Browne;T C Rindflesch

  • Exploiting MeSH indexing in MEDLINE to generate a data set for word sense disambiguation

    Antonio José Jimeno-Yepes;Bridget T. McInnes;Alan R. Aronson

  • The NLM Medical Text Indexer System for Indexing Biomedical Literature.

    James G. Mork;Antonio Jimeno-Yepes;Alan R. Aronson

  • Towards linking patients and clinical information: detecting UMLS concepts in e-mail

    Patricia Flatley Brennan;Alan R. Aronson

  • Semantic relations asserting the etiology of genetic diseases.

    Thomas C. Rindflesch;Bisharah Libbus;Dimitar Hristovski;Alan R. Aronson

  • Semi-automatic indexing of full text biomedical articles.

    Mehmet Kayaalp;Alan R. Aronson

  • Analysis of biomedical text for chemical names: a comparison of three methods.

    W. J. Wilbur;G. F. Hazard;G. Divita;J. G. Mork

  • UMLS Language and Vocabulary Tools: AMIA 2003 Open Source Expo

    Allen C. Browne;Guy Divita;Alan R. Aronson;Alexa T. McCray

Frequent Co-Authors

Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
Thomas C. Rindflesch
Thomas C. Rindflesch National Institutes of Health
Antonio Jimeno Yepes
Antonio Jimeno Yepes RMIT University
Olivier Bodenreider
Olivier Bodenreider National Institutes of Health
W. John Wilbur
W. John Wilbur National Institutes of Health
Patrick Ruch
Patrick Ruch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
Qiaozhu Mei
Qiaozhu Mei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Naren Ramakrishnan
Naren Ramakrishnan Virginia Tech
Grietje Molema
Grietje Molema University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, there are several flexible options to help you achieve your goals, regardless of your background or budget. Choosing the cheapest online college can make earning your degree more accessible and lessen your financial burdens.

Worried about your academic history? Several of the best colleges for low gpa accept students who may not have top grades, giving more learners the chance to pursue a tech career.

Computer Science degrees can open doors in a wide range of industries, including those outside traditional technology. If you’re considering a broader field, you may want to learn what can you do with an environmental studies degree—many roles integrate technology with environmental solutions.

For those seeking a fast-track education, you can explore programs offering a 1 year computer science degree online for quicker entry into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Alan R. Aronson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles