World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
13052
World Ranking
3443
National Ranking
1664

Dina Demner-Fushman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dina Demner-Fushman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 300 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dina Demner-Fushman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dina Demner-Fushman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dina Demner-Fushman is a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on computer science, with an emphasis on artificial intelligence and its applications in biomedical domains.

Their body of research spans multiple subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Molecular Biology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Information Systems

Demner-Fushman has contributed extensively to topics such as topic modeling, biomedical text mining and ontologies, and natural language processing techniques. Other significant research areas include multimodal machine learning applications, advanced image and video retrieval techniques, image retrieval and classification techniques, and the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare and education.

Frequent publication venues for Demner-Fushman include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Data
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Their collaborative network consists of frequently coauthoring with researchers such as Asma Ben Abacha, Deepak Gupta, Kirk Roberts, Steven Bedrick, and Kyle Lo.

Demner-Fushman's recent papers include:

  • Large language models encode clinical knowledge, 2023, published in Nature
  • The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models, 2025, published in Nature Medicine
  • TREC-COVID: rationale and structure of an information retrieval shared task for COVID-19, 2020, published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • TREC-COVID, 2020, published in ACM SIGIR Forum
  • VQA-Med: Overview of the Medical Visual Question Answering Task at ImageCLEF 2019, 2024, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Marc D. Kohli;Marc B. Rosenman;Sonya E. Shooshan

  • Evaluation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions

    Xiaoli Huang;Jimmy J. Lin;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Methodological Review: What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support?

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Wendy W. Chapman;Clement J. McDonald

  • Frontiers of biomedical text mining: current progress

    Pierre Zweigenbaum;Dina Demner-Fushman;Hong Yu;Kevin Bretonnel Cohen

  • Learning to Read Chest X-Rays: Recurrent Neural Cascade Model for Automated Image Annotation

    Hoo-Chang Shin;Kirk Roberts;Le Lu;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Answering Clinical Questions with Knowledge-Based and Statistical Techniques

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Jimmy Lin

  • A dataset of clinically generated visual questions and answers about radiology images

    Jason J. Lau;Soumya Gayen;Asma Ben Abacha;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • MetaMap Lite: an evaluation of a new Java implementation of MetaMap

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Willie J Rogers;Alan R Aronson

  • Evaluating performance of biomedical image retrieval systems--an overview of the medical image retrieval task at ImageCLEF 2004-2013.

    Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Alba Garcia Seco de Herrera;Dina Demner-Fushman;Sameer K. Antani

  • A question-entailment approach to question answering.

    Asma Ben Abacha;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Biomedical Text Mining: A Survey of Recent Progress

    Matthew S. Simpson;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks

    Alba Garcia Seco de Herrera;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Dina Demner-Fushman;Sameer K. Antani

  • Design and Development of a Multimodal Biomedical Information Retrieval System

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Sameer K. Antani;Matthew S. Simpson;George R. Thoma

  • Overview of the TREC 2016 Clinical Decision Support Track.

    Kirk Roberts;Dina Demner-Fushman;Ellen M. Voorhees;William R. Hersh

  • Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 medical image retrieval and classiFIcation tasks

    Henning Müller;Henning Müller;Alba Garcia Seco de Herrera;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Extracting semantic predications from Medline citations for pharmacogenomics

    Caroline B Ahlers;Marcelo Fiszman;Dina Demner-Fushman;François-Michel Lang

  • Word sense disambiguation by selecting the best semantic type based on Journal Descriptor Indexing: Preliminary experiment

    Susanne M. Humphrey;Willie J. Rogers;Halil Kilicoglu;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Essie: A Concept-based Search Engine for Structured Biomedical Text

    Nicholas C. Ide;Russell F. Loane;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • Word sense disambiguation by selecting the best semantic type based on Journal Descriptor Indexing: Preliminary experiment

    Unknown

  • TREC-COVID: rationale and structure of an information retrieval shared task for COVID-19.

    Kirk Roberts;Tasmeer Alam;Steven Bedrick;Dina Demner-Fushman

  • VQA-Med: Overview of the Medical Visual Question Answering Task at ImageCLEF 2019.

    Asma Ben Abacha;Sadid A. Hasan;Vivek V. Datla;Joey Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

George R. Thoma
George R. Thoma National Institutes of Health
Sameer Antani
Sameer Antani National Institutes of Health
Alan R. Aronson
Alan R. Aronson National Institutes of Health
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Ellen M. Voorhees
Ellen M. Voorhees National Institute of Standards and Technology
Sophia Ananiadou
Sophia Ananiadou University of Manchester
Jun'ichi Tsujii
Jun'ichi Tsujii University of Manchester
Douglas W. Oard
Douglas W. Oard University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and career directions. If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, consider an associate degree in 6 months online. These fast-track programs focus on practical skills and foundational knowledge, preparing you for entry-level tech roles or further study.

For students seeking a flexible yet comprehensive education, pursuing an online bachelors degree in Computer Science or related fields can be both convenient and cost-effective. Many universities also offer programs that allow you to specialize in areas like software engineering or cybersecurity.

If you are interested in expanding your career options beyond technology, an online business degree cost can be surprisingly affordable at several accredited institutions, letting you combine business expertise with technical skills for greater versatility.

For those focused on engineering, flexible pathways like an engineer degree online can help you pursue careers in hardware, systems, or industrial engineering while studying at your own pace.

These online options make it easier than ever to customize your education and fit your studies around work or family commitments, paving the way for diverse and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Dina Demner-Fushman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles