World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
16256
World Ranking
2431
National Ranking
1146

Randy H. Kardon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy H. Kardon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 394 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Randy H. Kardon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy H. Kardon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randy H. Kardon is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has a significant body of research in the field of medicine, with a focus on ophthalmology. Their work encompasses a broad set of subfields including ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, pathology and forensic medicine, and biomedical engineering.

The primary research topics explored by Kardon include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal imaging and analysis
  • Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
  • Optical coherence tomography applications
  • Ocular surface and contact lens
  • Retinal development and disorders
  • Retinal diseases and treatments

Their recent published papers represent a range of interdisciplinary studies, many focusing on optical coherence tomography and related neuro-ophthalmological issues:

  • "Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: A 3-year prospective multicenter study," 2021, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Optical Coherence Tomography Neuro-Toolbox for the Diagnosis and Management of Papilledema, Optic Disc Edema, and Pseudopapilledema," 2020, Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • "Focus on Data: Statistical Design of Experiments and Sample Size Selection Using Power Analysis," 2020, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • "Photophobia: shared pathophysiology underlying dry eye disease, migraine and traumatic brain injury leading to central neuroplasticity of the trigeminothalamic pathway," 2020, British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "Association of Optical Coherence Tomography With Longitudinal Neurodegeneration in Veterans With Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury," 2020, JAMA Network Open

Kardon collaborates frequently with numerous researchers, including:

  • Mona K. Garvin
  • Mark J. Kupersmith
  • Jui-Kai Wang
  • Oliver W. Gramlich
  • Edward F. Linton

Their publications are primarily featured in journals associated with ophthalmology and vision science. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Experimental Eye Research

Kardon's research offers insights into ophthalmic imaging and diagnosis, particularly through the use of optical coherence tomography, applying interdisciplinary approaches that span neuro-ophthalmology and biomedical engineering.

Best Publications

  • A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage

    Donald C. Hood;Randy H. Kardon

  • Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography.

    Fiona Costello;Stuart Coupland;William Hodge;Gianni R. Lorello

  • Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Axel Petzold;Johannes F de Boer;Sven Schippling;Patrik Vermersch

  • Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Optimal 3-D Graph Search

    M.K. Garvin;M.D. Abramoff;R. Kardon;S.R. Russell

  • Visual improvement with corticosteroid therapy in giant cell arteritis. Report of a large study and review of literature

    Sohan Singh Hayreh;Bridget Zimmerman;Randy H. Kardon

  • Nicotinamide Riboside Opposes Type 2 Diabetes and Neuropathy in Mice

    Samuel A.J. Trammell;Benjamin J. Weidemann;Ankita Chadda;Matthew S. Yorek

  • Diagnosis and Grading of Papilledema in Patients With Raised Intracranial Pressure Using Optical Coherence Tomography vs Clinical Expert Assessment Using a Clinical Staging Scale

    Colin J. Scott;Randy H. Kardon;Andrew G. Lee;Lars Frisén

  • Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response.

    Jason C. Park;Ana L. Moura;Ali S. Raza;David W. Rhee

  • Tracking retinal nerve fiber layer loss after optic neuritis: a prospective study using optical coherence tomography

    F Costello;W Hodge;Y I Pan;E Eggenberger

  • Structure versus Function in Glaucoma: An Application of a Linear Model

    Donald C. Hood;Susan C. Anderson;Michael Wall;Randy H. Kardon

  • Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex.

    Randy Kardon;Randy Kardon;Susan C. Anderson;Susan C. Anderson;Tina G. Damarjian;Elizabeth M. Grace

  • Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness and Local Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma

    Ali S. Raza;Jungsuk Cho;Carlos G. V. de Moraes;Min Wang

  • Latency of the pupil light reflex: sample rate, stimulus intensity, and variation in normal subjects.

    Oliver Bergamin;Randy H. Kardon

  • MR imaging of pituitary morphology in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

    William T.C. Yuh;Mingwang Zhu;Toshiaki Taoka;Jerome P. Quets

  • Sleep apnea and intracranial hypertension in men.

    Andrew G Lee;Karl Golnik;Randy Kardon;Michael Wall

  • Standards in Pupillography.

    Carina Kelbsch;Torsten Strasser;Yanjun Chen;Beatrix Feigl

  • Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

    Randy Kardon;Randy Kardon;Susan C. Anderson;Susan C. Anderson;Tina G. Damarjian;Elizabeth M. Grace

  • Transplantation of BDNF-Secreting Mesenchymal Stem Cells Provides Neuroprotection in Chronically Hypertensive Rat Eyes

    Matthew M. Harper;Sinisa D. Grozdanic;Bas Blits;Markus H. Kuehn

  • Optical coherence tomography of the swollen optic nerve head: deformation of the peripapillary retinal pigment epithelium layer in papilledema.

    Mark J. Kupersmith;Patrick Sibony;Gary Mandel;Mary Durbin

  • Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

    Aki Kawasaki;Randy H Kardon

  • Critical evaluation of the cocaine test in the diagnosis of Horner's syndrome.

    R H Kardon;C E Denison;C K Brown;H S Thompson

  • Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography

    F. Costello;S. Coupland;W. Hodge;G.R. Lorello

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Abràmoff
Michael D. Abràmoff University of Iowa
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
Mark A. Yorek
Mark A. Yorek University of Iowa
Andrew F. Russo
Andrew F. Russo University of Iowa
Milan Sonka
Milan Sonka University of Iowa
Axel Petzold
Axel Petzold University College London
Donald C. Hood
Donald C. Hood Columbia University
Kelvin O. Lim
Kelvin O. Lim University of Minnesota
Mark S. Hargrove
Mark S. Hargrove Iowa State University
Jess G. Fiedorowicz
Jess G. Fiedorowicz University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Randy H. Kardon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles