World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
25525
World Ranking
11024
National Ranking
5675

Donald C. Hood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald C. Hood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Donald C. Hood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald C. Hood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald C. Hood is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research spans mainly within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Ophthalmology, supported by extensive work in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition subfields.

The scientist's primary topics of research include Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Retinal and Macular Surgery, Corneal surgery and disorders, Optical Coherence Tomography Applications, and Retinal and Optic Conditions.

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Donald C. Hood include:

  • "Robust and Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Glaucoma in Optical Coherence Tomography Images" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • "An Automated Method for Assessing Topographical Structure-Function Agreement in Abnormal Glaucomatous Regions" (2020), published in Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • "Macular Damage in Glaucoma is Associated With Deficits in Facial Recognition" (2020), published in American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "Optical Coherence Tomography Can Be Used to Assess Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage in Most Eyes With High Myopia" (2020), published in Journal of Glaucoma
  • "A Case for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma Assessment" (2021), published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Donald C. Hood include:

  • Emmanouil Tsamis
  • Jeffrey M. Liebmann
  • Carlos Gustavo De Moraes
  • Robert Ritch

Donald C. Hood's research has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Glaucoma
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • JAMA Ophthalmology

The research focuses particularly on the application of advanced imaging technologies and automated methods, including artificial intelligence, for assessing ocular diseases such as glaucoma. Their work often intersects clinical ophthalmology and technological innovation aimed at diagnosing and understanding retinal and optic nerve conditions.

Best Publications

  • Glaucomatous damage of the macula

    Donald C. Hood;Ali S. Raza;Carlos Gustavo V. de Moraes;Carlos Gustavo V. de Moraes;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Jeffrey M. Liebmann

  • A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage

    Donald C. Hood;Randy H. Kardon

  • ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition)

    Donald C. Hood;Michael Bach;Mitchell Brigell;David Keating

  • Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique

    Donald C Hood

  • Retinal Origins of the Primate Multifocal ERG: Implications for the Human Response

    Donald C. Hood;Laura J. Frishman;Shannon Saszik;Suresh Viswanathan

  • Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG)

    Michael F Marmor;Donald C Hood;David Keating;Mineo Kondo

  • Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

    Donald C Hood;Vivienne C Greenstein

  • Automated layer segmentation of macular OCT images using dual-scale gradient information

    Qi Yang;Charles A. Reisman;Zhenguo Wang;Yasufumi Fukuma

  • Disease sequence from mutant rhodopsin allele to rod and cone photoreceptor degeneration in man

    Artur V. Cideciyan;Donald C. Hood;Yijun Huang;Eyal Banin

  • A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs.

    Donald C. Hood;William Seiple;Karen Holopigian;Vivienne Greenstein

  • Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response.

    Jason C. Park;Ana L. Moura;Ali S. Raza;David W. Rhee

  • Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).

    Donald C. Hood

  • Shades of gray matter: noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation.

    Gabriele Gratton;Paul M. Corballis;Eunhee Cho;Monica Fabiani

  • Structure versus Function in Glaucoma: An Application of a Linear Model

    Donald C. Hood;Susan C. Anderson;Michael Wall;Randy H. Kardon

  • Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa : estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave

    D C Hood;D G Birch

  • Blood vessel contributions to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profiles measured with optical coherence tomography.

    Donald C. Hood;Brad Fortune;Stella N. Arthur;Danli Xing

  • ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography (2007 edition)

    Donald C. Hood;Michael Bach;Mitchell Brigell;David Keating

  • An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve.

    Donald C. Hood;Xian Zhang;Vivienne C. Greenstein;Shreya Kangovi

  • A computational model of the amplitude and implicit time of the b-wave of the human ERG.

    Donald C. Hood;David G. Birch

  • Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs.

    Donald C Hood;Carlos Gustavo De Moraes

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Ritch
Robert Ritch New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Jeffrey M. Liebmann
Jeffrey M. Liebmann University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
David G. Birch
David G. Birch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Xian Zhang
Xian Zhang Hefei Institutes of Physical Science
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong
Randy H. Kardon
Randy H. Kardon University of Iowa
Chris A. Johnson
Chris A. Johnson University of Iowa
Rando Allikmets
Rando Allikmets Columbia University
Janet R. Sparrow
Janet R. Sparrow Columbia University
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a future in Medicine in the USA, online healthcare degrees offer flexible alternatives and diverse career pathways. With high demand for specialized practitioners, the popularity of online pmhnp programs (Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner) is rising. These programs allow students to pursue advanced roles in mental health care, often without relocating or disrupting current employment.

For those looking to lead or manage within the healthcare sector, affordability is a key concern. Many students are seeking out the healthcare administration degree cost comparisons online to find programs that fit their budget. Investigating the cheapest mha online programs (Master of Healthcare Administration) can help aspiring health managers or administrators advance their careers efficiently.

Likewise, for those already in nursing, searching for the cheapest dnp (Doctor of Nursing Practice) programs can help professionals achieve the highest clinical expertise while managing educational expenses. Carefully considering your degree options and their costs allows you to plan your next steps toward a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Donald C. Hood

Trending Scientists