World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Felipe A. Medeiros

Felipe A. Medeiros

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
33293
World Ranking
9679
National Ranking
4981

Felipe A. Medeiros publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felipe A. Medeiros sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 609 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Felipe A. Medeiros D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felipe A. Medeiros sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Felipe A. Medeiros is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily within the field of medicine, with a strong focus on ophthalmology. Their research contributions span multiple subfields including ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and molecular biology.

The main topics of Felipe A. Medeiros's work revolve around glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal imaging and analysis, retinal diseases and treatments, corneal surgery and disorders, retinopathy of prematurity studies, ocular surface and contact lens, and neurological disorders and treatments.

Among the notable recent papers authored by Felipe A. Medeiros are:

  • "Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of Bimatoprost Implant in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 1)", 2020, Ophthalmology
  • "Detection of Progressive Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage on Fundus Photographs with Deep Learning", 2020, Ophthalmology

In collaboration with other researchers, Felipe has also contributed to studies in the field, often co-authoring with frequent collaborators such as Alessandro A. Jammal, Samuel I. Berchuck, Eduardo B. Mariottoni, Swarup S. Swaminathan, and Robert N. Weinreb.

Their publications appear in prominent journals and venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • Ophthalmology
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology

The combination of these publication venues and frequent collaborations reflects a consistent engagement with highly specialized research in eye diseases and vision science.

Best Publications

  • The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Glaucoma: A Review

    Robert N. Weinreb;Tin Aung;Felipe A. Medeiros

  • Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Felipe A. Medeiros;Linda M. Zangwill;Christopher Bowd;Roberto M. Vessani

  • Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients.

    Eamon W. Leung;Felipe A. Medeiros;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma.

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Linda M. Zangwill;Christopher Bowd;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes.

    Adeleh Yarmohammadi;Linda M. Zangwill;Alberto Diniz-Filho;Min Hee Suh

  • Primary open-angle glaucoma.

    Robert N Weinreb;Christopher K S Leung;Jonathan G Crowston;Felipe A Medeiros

  • Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.

    Adeleh Yarmohammadi;Linda M. Zangwill;Alberto Diniz-Filho;Min Hee Suh

  • Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

    Felipe A Medeiros;Pamela A Sample;Linda M Zangwill;Christopher Bowd

  • Common Variants at 9p21 and 8q22 Are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Optic Nerve Degeneration in Glaucoma

    Janey L. Wiggs;Brian L. Yaspan;Michael A. Hauser;Jae H. Kang

  • The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): Design and Baseline Data

    Pamela A. Sample;Christopher A. Girkin;Linda M. Zangwill;Sonia Jain

  • Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Glaucoma Progression: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Daniel Meira-Freitas;Daniel Meira-Freitas;Renato Lisboa;Renato Lisboa;Tung-Mei Kuang;Tung-Mei Kuang;Tung-Mei Kuang

  • Reproducibility of RTVue Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Disc Measurements and Agreement with Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements

    Alberto O. González-García;Gianmarco Vizzeri;Christopher Bowd;Felipe A. Medeiros

  • Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness

    Gianmarco Vizzeri;Robert N Weinreb;Alberto O Gonzalez-Garcia;Christopher Bowd

  • The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change.

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Linda M. Zangwill;Christopher Bowd;Kaweh Mansouri

  • Detection of Glaucoma Progression with Stratus OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, Optic Nerve Head, and Macular Thickness Measurements

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Linda M. Zangwill;Luciana M. Alencar;Christopher Bowd

  • Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue optical coherence tomography devices in glaucoma.

    Mauro T. Leite;Harsha L. Rao;Harsha L. Rao;Linda M. Zangwill;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Pamela A. Sample;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Peripapillary and Macular Vessel Density in Patients with Glaucoma and Single-Hemifield Visual Field Defect

    Adeleh Yarmohammadi;Linda M. Zangwill;Alberto Diniz-Filho;Luke J. Saunders

  • Validation of a Predictive Model to Estimate the Risk of Conversion From Ocular Hypertension to Glaucoma

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Robert N. Weinreb;Pamela A. Sample;Cintia F. Gomi

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert N. Weinreb
Robert N. Weinreb University of California, San Diego
Linda M. Zangwill
Linda M. Zangwill University of California, San Diego
Pamela A. Sample
Pamela A. Sample University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey M. Liebmann
Jeffrey M. Liebmann University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Tzyy-Ping Jung
Tzyy-Ping Jung University of California, San Diego
Robert Ritch
Robert Ritch New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Louis R. Pasquale
Louis R. Pasquale Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Te-Won Lee
Te-Won Lee Qualcomm (United States)
Janey L. Wiggs
Janey L. Wiggs Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending medical school. Many students enter healthcare by pursuing affordable and flexible online degrees, which can open doors to a wide range of in-demand roles.

For those interested in managing patient data and medical records, a health information technology online degree provides essential skills in healthcare data management, coding, and compliance. Alternatively, if you wish to quickly enter the workforce, the cheapest medical coding certification online options help you become certified in medical billing and coding—professions with high employment demand.

Nursing remains a vital pathway. Students can launch or advance their nursing careers by enrolling in affordable online nursing programs, many of which offer flexible learning for those balancing work and study. For current nurses looking to become advanced practitioners, the cheapest np programs online offer rigorous yet cost-effective training to move into specialty and leadership roles.

Whether you’re starting out or seeking career advancement, these online options deliver valuable healthcare knowledge, are cost-effective, and can be completed from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Felipe A. Medeiros

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles