World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 54 3664 3458 189 179 181 8844

Julien Thevenon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julien Thevenon between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julien Thevenon published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2019. 13 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2019. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2007 2025

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julien Thevenon: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 4
2013 5
2014 13
2015 11
2016 21
2017 27
2018 25
2019 29
2020 23
2021 13
2022 13
2023 13
2024 5
2025 8
Total 214
Download as CSV

Julien Thevenon publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Thevenon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 181 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 181
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Julien Thevenon D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Thevenon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145 54
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Julien Thevenon is affiliated with the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble in France. Their research spans key areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus on genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Thevenon's recent publications include the following:

  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development (2020, Neuron)
  • Variants in the SK2 channel gene (KCNN2) lead to dominant neurodevelopmental movement disorders (2020, Brain)
  • Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for copy number variant detection: retrospective evaluation and prospective screening in 2418 cases (2022, Journal of Medical Genetics)
  • Further delineation of the female phenotype with KDM5C disease causing variants: 19 new individuals and review of the literature (2020, Clinical Genetics)
  • Monoallelic variation in DHX9, the gene encoding the DExH-box helicase DHX9, underlies neurodevelopment disorders and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (2023, The American Journal of Human Genetics)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Their most common co-authors are:

  • Laurence Faivre (31 co-authored works)
  • Christel Thauvin-Robinet (26 co-authored works)
  • David Geneviève (22 co-authored works)
  • Frédéric Tran Mau-Them (20 co-authored works)
  • Ange-Line Bruel (17 co-authored works)

Thevenon's publications are often featured in various academic venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (9 publications)
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (5 publications)
  • Genetics in Medicine (5 publications)
  • Clinical Genetics (4 publications)
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (4 publications)

The primary fields of study associated with Thevenon's work are:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (138 publications)
  • Medicine (40 publications)

Thevenon's subfields of study highlight a concentration in areas such as:

  • Genetics (76 publications)
  • Molecular Biology (56 publications)
  • Cancer Research (7 publications)
  • Immunology (4 publications)
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (4 publications)

Thevenon's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases (60 publications)
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (34 publications)
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (30 publications)
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (12 publications)
  • Congenital heart defects research (12 publications)
  • RNA Research and Splicing (10 publications)
  • RNA regulation and disease (8 publications)

Best Publications

  • Pericentric heterochromatin reprogramming by new histone variants during mouse spermiogenesis.

    Jérôme Govin;Emmanuelle Escoffier;Emmanuelle Escoffier;Sophie Rousseaux;Sophie Rousseaux;Lauriane Kuhn;Lauriane Kuhn;Lauriane Kuhn

  • Efficient strategy for the molecular diagnosis of intellectual disability using targeted high-throughput sequencing

    Claire Redin;Bénédicte Gérard;Julia Lauer;Yvan Herenger

  • Diagnostic odyssey in severe neurodevelopmental disorders: toward clinical whole-exome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test.

    J. Thevenon;Y. Duffourd;A. Masurel-Paulet;M. Lefebvre

  • The landscape of epilepsy-related GATOR1 variants

    Sara Baldassari;Fabienne Picard;Nienke E. Verbeek;Marjan van Kempen

  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development

    Ashley L. Lennox;Mariah L. Hoye;Ruiji Jiang;Bethany L. Johnson-Kerner

  • PIK3R1 Mutations Cause Syndromic Insulin Resistance with Lipoatrophy

    Christel Thauvin-Robinet;Martine Auclair;Laurence Duplomb;Martine Caron-Debarle

  • Disruption of POGZ Is Associated with Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Holly A.F. Stessman;Marjolein H. Willemsen;Michaela Fenckova;Osnat Penn

  • Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare disorders with congenital anomalies and/or intellectual disability: substantial interest of prospective annual reanalysis.

    Sophie Nambot;Julien Thevenon;Paul Kuentz;Yannis Duffourd

  • Disruption of the ATXN1-CIC complex causes a spectrum of neurobehavioral phenotypes in mice and humans.

    Hsiang Chih Lu;Hsiang Chih Lu;Qiumin Tan;Maxime W.C. Rousseaux;Wei Wang

  • BCL11A Haploinsufficiency Causes an Intellectual Disability Syndrome and Dysregulates Transcription

    Cristina Dias;Sara B. Estruch;Sarah A. Graham;Jeremy McRae

  • Mutations in signal recognition particle SRP54 cause syndromic neutropenia with Shwachman-Diamond–like features

    Raphael Carapito;Martina Konantz;Catherine Paillard;Zhichao Miao

  • The oral-facial-digital syndrome gene C2CD3 encodes a positive regulator of centriole elongation

    Christel Thauvin-Robinet;Jaclyn S Lee;Estelle Lopez;Vicente Herranz-Pérez

  • Mutations in SLC13A5 cause autosomal-recessive epileptic encephalopathy with seizure onset in the first days of life.

    Julien Thevenon;Mathieu Milh;François Feillet;Judith St-Onge

  • The DYRK1A gene is a cause of syndromic intellectual disability with severe microcephaly and epilepsy

    Jean-Benoît Courcet;Laurence Faivre;Perrine Malzac;Alice Masurel-Paulet

  • In-Frame Mutations in Exon 1 of SKI Cause Dominant Shprintzen-Goldberg Syndrome

    Virginie Carmignac;Julien Thevenon;Lesley Adès;Lesley Adès;Bert Callewaert

  • Epigenetic reprogramming of the male genome during gametogenesis and in the zygote.

    S Rousseaux;N Reynoird;E Escoffier;J Thevenon

  • Molecular diagnosis of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) in 162 patients and recommendations for genetic testing

    Paul Kuentz;Judith St-Onge;Judith St-Onge;Yannis Duffourd;Jean-Benoît Courcet

  • WNT Signaling Perturbations Underlie the Genetic Heterogeneity of Robinow Syndrome

    Janson J. White;Juliana F. Mazzeu;Zeynep Coban-Akdemir;Yavuz Bayram

  • Fifteen years of research on oral–facial–digital syndromes: from 1 to 16 causal genes

    Ange Line Bruel;Brunella Franco;Yannis Duffourd;Julien Thevenon

  • Lysosomal Signaling Licenses Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation via Inactivation of Tfe3.

    Florian Villegas;Florian Villegas;Daphné Lehalle;Daniela Mayer;Daniela Mayer;Melanie Rittirsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurence Faivre
Laurence Faivre University of Burgundy
Christel Thauvin-Robinet
Christel Thauvin-Robinet University of Burgundy
Jeanne Amiel
Jeanne Amiel Université Paris Cité
Bertrand Isidor
Bertrand Isidor Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Amélie Piton
Amélie Piton University of Strasbourg
Gaetan Lesca
Gaetan Lesca Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Stanislas Lyonnet
Stanislas Lyonnet Université Paris Cité
Damien Sanlaville
Damien Sanlaville Hospices Civils de Lyon
Valérie Cormier-Daire
Valérie Cormier-Daire Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
Delphine Héron
Delphine Héron Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open the door to a wide range of online degree and career opportunities. For those interested in healthcare but looking beyond traditional roles, medical billing and coding is a popular choice. This field offers strong job growth and is often compatible with remote work after certification.

Many students seek flexible education paths. Fast track program options let you complete your degree in less time, while still focusing on critical foundation skills in biology, laboratory work, and data analysis. If you need maximum flexibility, best online self paced colleges allow you to study when it fits your schedule, making it easier to balance work, family, and education.

Worried about upfront costs? Consider colleges with no application fee to lower your expenses when applying. These accessible online pathways can help you build a genetics-related career in research, healthcare, technology, or administration—whatever your ambitions may be.

Best Scientists Citing Julien Thevenon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles