World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
22338
World Ranking
2481
National Ranking
1176

James N. Campbell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James N. Campbell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James N. Campbell is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans fields primarily in Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with focused subfields including Genetics, Physiology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several main topics such as connective tissue disorders research, obstructive sleep apnea research, bone fractures and treatments, neonatal respiratory health research, spinal fractures and fixation techniques, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, and hip disorders and treatments.

Recent notable publications by James N. Campbell include:

  • International Consensus Statement on the diagnosis, multidisciplinary management and lifelong care of individuals with achondroplasia, 2021, Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Mouse Genome Informatics: an integrated knowledgebase system for the laboratory mouse, 2024, Genetics
  • Achondroplasia Natural History Study (CLARITY): 60-year experience in cervicomedullary decompression in achondroplasia from four skeletal dysplasia centers, 2021, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics
  • Racial and sex disparities in HIV screening outcomes within emergency departments of Harris County, Texas, 2020, Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
  • OP0187 DETERMINING OPTIMAL COOLING AND ADMINISTRATION METHODS FOR CNTX-4975 INTRA-ARTICULAR INJECTION IN SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE OSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE PAIN, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Campbell are Michael B. Bober, Julie Hoover-Fong, Joseph H. Piatt, Mary Ellen Little, and Mary C. Theroux.

The primary publication venues for Campbell's work include:

  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics
  • Neurosurgery Clinics of North America
  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Genetics

Best Publications

  • Neuropathic pain Redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes

    R. D. Treede;T. S. Jensen;J. N. Campbell;G. Cruccu

  • Mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

    James N. Campbell;Richard A. Meyer

  • Peripheral and central mechanisms of cutaneous hyperalgesia.

    Rolf Detlef Treede;Richard A. Meyer;Srinivasa N. Raja;James N. Campbell

  • Myelinated afferents signal the hyperalgesia associated with nerve injury.

    James N. Campbell;Srinivasa N. Raja;Richard A. Meyer;Richard A. Meyer;Susan E. Mackinnon

  • Evidence for two different heat transduction mechanisms in nociceptive primary afferents innervating monkey skin.

    R D Treede;R A Meyer;S N Raja;J N Campbell

  • Comparison of responses of warm and nociceptive C-fiber afferents in monkey with human judgments of thermal pain.

    Robert H. LaMotte;James N. Campbell

  • Early onset of spontaneous activity in uninjured C-fiber nociceptors after injury to neighboring nerve fibers.

    Gang Wu;Matthias Ringkamp;Timothy V. Hartke;Beth B. Murinson

  • Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation.

    Richard B. North;James N. Campbell;Carol S. James;Mary Kay Conover-Walker

  • Peripheral mechanisms of cutaneous nociception

    Richard A. Meyer;Matthias Ringkamp;James N. Campbell;Srinivasa N. Raja

  • Ataxic sensory neuropathy and dorsal root ganglionitis associated with Sjögren's syndrome.

    J. W. Griffin;D. R. Cornblath;E. Alexander;J. Campbell

  • Topical application of clonidine relieves hyperalgesia in patients with sympathetically maintained pain

    K. D. Davis;R. D. Treede;S. N. Raja;R. A. Meyer;R. A. Meyer

  • Myelinated nociceptive afferents account for the hyperalgesia that follows a burn to the hand

    Richard A. Meyer;Richard A. Meyer;James N. Campbell

  • Peripheral mechanisms of somatic pain.

    Srinivasa N. Raja;Richard A. Meyer;James N. Campbell

  • EVIDENCE FOR DIFFERENT MECHANISMS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HYPERALGESIA FOLLOWING HEAT INJURY TO THE GLABROUS SKIN

    Srinivasa N. Raja;James N. Campbell;Richard A. Meyer

  • Systemic alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine: a diagnostic test for sympathetically maintained pain.

    Srinivasa N. Raja;Rolf-Detlef Treede;Karen D. Davis;James N. Campbell

  • Complications from silicon-polymer intubulation of nerves.

    M. Merle;A. L. Dellon;James N Campbell;P. S. Chang

  • Degeneration of myelinated efferent fibers induces spontaneous activity in uninjured C-fiber afferents

    Gang Wu;Matthias Ringkamp;Beth B. Murinson;Esther M. Pogatzki

  • Myelinated mechanically insensitive afferents from monkey hairy skin: heat-response properties.

    Rolf Detlef Treede;Richard A. Meyer;James N. Campbell

  • Uninjured C-Fiber Nociceptors Develop Spontaneous Activity and α-Adrenergic Sensitivity Following L6 Spinal Nerve Ligation in Monkey

    Z. Ali;M. Ringkamp;T. V. Hartke;H. F. Chien

  • Intradermal injection of norepinephrine evokes pain in patients with sympathetically maintained pain.

    Zahid Ali;Srinivasa N. Raja;Ursula Wesselmann;Perry N. Fuchs

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Meyer
Richard A. Meyer Johns Hopkins University
Srinivasa N. Raja
Srinivasa N. Raja Johns Hopkins University
Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Karen D. Davis
Karen D. Davis University Health Network
Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Claudia M. Campbell
Claudia M. Campbell Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Matthias Ringkamp
Matthias Ringkamp Johns Hopkins University
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ze'ev Seltzer
Ze'ev Seltzer University of Toronto
Robert H. LaMotte
Robert H. LaMotte Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James N. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles