World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
16540
World Ranking
17765
National Ranking
8865

Pamela A. Sample publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela A. Sample sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 283 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Pamela A. Sample D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela A. Sample sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pamela A. Sample is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on research activities associated with this institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work are documented in the available data. Likewise, there are no awards or honors listed that have been conferred upon this scientist.

This absence of detailed research output or listed scientific contributions limits the characterization of Pamela A. Sample's specific research interests or thematic expertise beyond the institutional affiliation provided.

Best Publications

  • Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function.

    Christopher Bowd;Linda M. Zangwill;Charles C. Berry;Eytan Z. Blumenthal

  • Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

    Felipe A Medeiros;Pamela A Sample;Linda M Zangwill;Christopher Bowd

  • Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: a review.

    Lyne Racette;M.Roy Wilson;Linda M Zangwill;Robert N Weinreb

  • The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): Design and Baseline Data

    Pamela A. Sample;Christopher A. Girkin;Linda M. Zangwill;Sonia Jain

  • Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography

    Renuka Bathija;Linda Zangwill;Charles C. Berry;Pamela A. Sample

  • Detection of Glaucoma With Scanning Laser Polarimetry

    Robert N. Weinreb;Linda Zangwill;Charles C. Berry;Renuka Bathija

  • Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis

    Kwokleung Chan;Te-Won Lee;P.A. Sample;M.H. Goldbaum

  • Association Between Quantitative Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement and Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma

    Robert N. Weinreb;Sima Shakiba;Pamela A. Sample;Shah In Shahrokni

  • Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness

    Gianmarco Vizzeri;Robert N Weinreb;Alberto O Gonzalez-Garcia;Christopher Bowd

  • Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.

    Pamela A. Sample;Charles F. Bosworth;Eytan Z. Blumenthal;Christopher Girkin

  • Detection of Glaucoma Progression with Stratus OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, Optic Nerve Head, and Macular Thickness Measurements

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Linda M. Zangwill;Luciana M. Alencar;Christopher Bowd

  • Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Pamela A. Sample;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk

    Pamela A. Sample;James D.N. Taylor;Genaro A. Martinez;Moshe Lusky

  • Validation of a Predictive Model to Estimate the Risk of Conversion From Ocular Hypertension to Glaucoma

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Robert N. Weinreb;Pamela A. Sample;Cintia F. Gomi

  • Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry.

    Christopher Bowd;Linda M. Zangwill;Felipe A. Medeiros;Ivan M. Tavares

  • Comparison of Different Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Scanning Areas for Glaucoma Diagnosis

    Harsha L. Rao;Harsha L. Rao;Linda M. Zangwill;Robert N. Weinreb;Pamela A. Sample

  • Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma.

    Pamela A. Sample;Robert N. Weinreb

  • Prediction of Functional Loss in Glaucoma From Progressive Optic Disc Damage

    Felipe A. Medeiros;Luciana M. Alencar;Linda M. Zangwill;Christopher Bowd

  • Diagnostic Tools for Glaucoma Detection and Management

    Pooja Sharma;Pamela A. Sample;Linda M. Zangwill;Joel S. Schuman

  • Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes

    Atsuya Miki;Felipe A. Medeiros;Robert N. Weinreb;Sonia Jain

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert N. Weinreb
Robert N. Weinreb University of California, San Diego
Linda M. Zangwill
Linda M. Zangwill University of California, San Diego
Felipe A. Medeiros
Felipe A. Medeiros Duke University
Jeffrey M. Liebmann
Jeffrey M. Liebmann University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Te-Won Lee
Te-Won Lee Qualcomm (United States)
Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Chris A. Johnson
Chris A. Johnson University of Iowa
William R. Freeman
William R. Freeman University of California, San Diego
Igor Grant
Igor Grant University of California, San Diego
Charles C. Berry
Charles C. Berry University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing medicine in the USA opens up several alternative study and career options through online healthcare degrees. For registered nurses looking to advance their education, there are rn to bsn programs no clinicals required, making it convenient for working professionals to upgrade their qualifications while balancing work.

Individuals aiming for leadership and advanced practice roles may consider doctorate-level programs. Many choose the fastest dnp online program or a 1 year dnp program online to accelerate their learning and quickly access higher-paying positions. These pathways are designed to meet growing healthcare demands and often offer greater flexibility than traditional on-campus options.

For those entering nursing from scratch, a 6 month lpn program offers a fast-track route into the workforce. Carefully reviewing program requirements, clinical components, and accreditation is crucial before starting. These diverse degree and career pathways empower students to tailor their medical journey to their individual goals and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela A. Sample

Recently Published Articles