World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Allison M. McKendrick

Allison M. McKendrick

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4969
World Ranking
8832
National Ranking
265

Allison M. McKendrick publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison M. McKendrick sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 255 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Allison M. McKendrick D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison M. McKendrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allison M. McKendrick is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans various subfields including Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Neurology.

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics within vision science. Key areas include visual perception and processing mechanisms, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal imaging and analysis, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, retinal diseases and treatments, as well as migraine and headache studies and olfactory and sensory function studies.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Allison M. McKendrick include:

  • Ocular motor measures of visual processing changes in visual snow syndrome, 2020, published in Neurology
  • Differential aging effects in motion perception tasks for central and peripheral vision, 2020, published in Journal of Vision
  • Detecting glaucoma from multi-modal data using probabilistic deep learning, 2022, published in Frontiers in Medicine
  • Eye movement characteristics provide an objective measure of visual processing changes in patients with visual snow syndrome, 2021, published in Scientific Reports
  • Visual contrast perception in visual snow syndrome reveals abnormal neural gain but not neural noise, 2021, published in Brain

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McKendrick include Andrew Turpin, Bao N. Nguyen, Owen White, Joanne Fielding, and Andrew J. Anderson. Collaboration with these researchers has resulted in multiple joint publications, with the highest number of collaborations occurring with Andrew Turpin and Bao N. Nguyen.

Publications are frequently found in venues specializing in vision science and ophthalmology. These include Translational Vision Science & Technology, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Vision, and Clinical and Experimental Optometry.

Best Publications

  • Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

    Paul G. D. Spry;Chris A. Johnson;Allison M. McKendrick;Andrew Turpin

  • Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.

    Andrew Turpin;Allison M. McKendrick;Chris A. Johnson;Algis J. Vingrys

  • Visual field losses in subjects with migraine headaches.

    Allison M. McKendrick;Algis J. Vingrys;David R. Badcock;John T. Heywood

  • Contrast sensitivity changes due to glaucoma and normal aging : Low-spatial-frequency losses in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways

    Allison M McKendrick;Geoffrey P Sampson;Mark J Walland;David R Badcock

  • Motion processing deficits in migraine

    AM McKendrick;Badcock

  • Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation.

    Andrew Turpin;Allison M. McKendrick;Chris A. Johnson;Algis J. Vingrys

  • Enhanced structure-function relationship in glaucoma with an anatomically and geometrically accurate neuroretinal rim measurement.

    Vishva M Danthurebandara;Glen P Sharpe;Donna M Hutchison;Jonathan Denniss

  • Visual Dysfunction between Migraine Events

    Allison M. McKendrick;Algis J. Vingrys;David R. Badcock;John T. Heywood

  • Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma.

    Allison M. McKendrick;David R. Badcock;William H. Morgan

  • Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

    Andrew Turpin;Allison M. McKendrick;Chris A. Johnson;Algis J. Vingrys

  • The Open Perimetry Interface: an enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics.

    Andrew Turpin;Paul H Artes;Allison M McKendrick

  • Migraine Increases Centre-Surround Suppression for Drifting Visual Stimuli

    Josephine Battista;David R. Badcock;Allison M. McKendrick

  • Occipital GABA levels in older adults and their relationship to visual perceptual suppression

    Kabilan Pitchaimuthu;Qi-zhu Wu;Olivia Carter;Bao N. Nguyen

  • The effect of normal aging on closed contour shape discrimination

    Allison M McKendrick;Anne E Weymouth;Josephine Battista

  • Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs with or without aura.

    Allison M. McKendrick;David R. Badcock

  • Aging alters surround modulation of perceived contrast.

    Renee Karas;Allison M. McKendrick

  • Distribution of astigmatism in the adult population

    Allison M. McKendrick;Noel A. Brennan

  • Processing of global form and motion in migraineurs.

    Jennifer A. Ditchfield;Allison M. McKendrick;David R. Badcock

  • The detection of both global motion and global form is disrupted in glaucoma.

    Allison M. McKendrick;David R. Badcock;William H. Morgan

  • Combining ganglion cell topology and data of patients with glaucoma to determine a structure-function map

    Andrew Turpin;Geoff P Sampson;Allison M McKendrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Turpin
Andrew Turpin University of Melbourne
Chris A. Johnson
Chris A. Johnson University of Iowa
Joanne M. Wood
Joanne M. Wood Queensland University of Technology
Trichur R. Vidyasagar
Trichur R. Vidyasagar University of Melbourne
Gary F. Egan
Gary F. Egan Monash University
Robyn H. Guymer
Robyn H. Guymer University of Melbourne
Stefan Bode
Stefan Bode University of Melbourne
Dominic Ffytche
Dominic Ffytche King's College London
Gary S. Rubin
Gary S. Rubin University College London
Cynthia Owsley
Cynthia Owsley University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of closely related online degree programs and meaningful careers in mental health, therapy, and psychology. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider careers in counseling or therapy, where a deep understanding of the brain and behavior is essential.

For those seeking to expand their expertise, exploring cacrep accredited programs can provide the credentials needed for licensed counseling roles. Those concerned about affordability may want to look into the cheapest online masters in mental health counseling—ideal for balancing cost with career opportunities.

If you're passionate about working with families, marriage and family therapy master's programs offer a focused pathway. For an even broader foundation, online master's programs in psychology are a popular choice, but many applicants first consider how much does masters in psychology cost.

With flexible online options, students can pursue these degrees alongside neuroscience interests to create diverse and rewarding mental health career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Allison M. McKendrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles