World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
14020
World Ranking
15441
National Ranking
6443

Burt G. Feuerstein publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burt G. Feuerstein sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Burt G. Feuerstein D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burt G. Feuerstein sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Burt G. Feuerstein is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with specific contributions spanning Molecular Biology, Genetics, Neurology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, as well as Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their work encompasses a variety of topics, including:

  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Migraine and Headache Studies

Burt G. Feuerstein has contributed to academic literature with papers published in notable venues such as the Journal of Neurosurgery and European Neurology. Some recent papers include:

  • Provision of rapid and specific ex vivo diagnosis of central nervous system lymphoma from rodent xenograft biopsies by a fluorescent aptamer, 2020, Journal of Neurosurgery
  • Close Your Eyes and See: Stroke Sequelae versus Functional Neurological Disorder in a Physician, 2023, European Neurology

Their research has involved collaboration with several coauthors, frequently working alongside:

  • Joseph Georges
  • Xiaodong Qi
  • Xiaowei Liu
  • Yu Zhou
  • Eric C. Woolf

Best Publications

  • Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis

    Heidi S. Phillips;Samir Kharbanda;Ruihuan Chen;William F. Forrest

  • Targeted expression of MYCN causes neuroblastoma in transgenic mice.

    William A. Weiss;Kenneth D Aldape;Gayatry Mohapatra;Burt G. Feuerstein

  • Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Values to Differentiate High-Grade Glioma Recurrence from Posttreatment Radiation Effect: Direct Correlation between Image-Guided Tissue Histopathology and Localized Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging Measurements

    L.S. Hu;L.C. Baxter;K.A. Smith;B.G. Feuerstein

  • Localization of common deletion regions on 1p and 19q in human gliomas and their association with histological subtype

    Justin S. Smith;Benjamin Alderete;Yuriko Minn;Thomas J. Borell

  • A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma.

    Howard Colman;Li Zhang;Erik P. Sulman;J. Matthew McDonald

  • Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma

    Janice M. Nigro;Anjan Misra;Li Zhang;Ivan Smirnov

  • Angiogenesis-independent tumor growth mediated by stem-like cancer cells.

    Per Ø. Sakariassen;Lars Prestegarden;Jian Wang;Kai-Ove Skaftnesmo

  • Contribution of Notch signaling activation to human glioblastoma multiforme

    Masayuki Kanamori;Tomohiro Kawaguchi;Janice M. Nigro;Burt G. Feuerstein

  • Gain of chromosome 17 is the most frequent abnormality detected in neuroblastoma by comparative genomic hybridization.

    Dominique Plantaz;Gayatry Mohapatra;Katherine K. Matthay;Malgorzata Pellarin

  • Implications and concepts of polyamine-nucleic acid interactions.

    Burt G. Feuerstein;Loren D. Williams;Hirak S. Basu;Laurence J. Marton

  • Integrated genomic and epigenomic analyses pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation in tumors.

    Giuseppe Zardo;Maarit I. Tiirikainen;Chibo Hong;Anjan Misra

  • Molecular mechanics of the interactions of spermine with DNA: DNA bending as a result of ligand binding

    Burt G. Feuerstein;Nagarajan Pattabiraman;Laurence J Marton

  • Spermine-DNA interactions: a theoretical study.

    Burt G. Feuerstein;Nagarajan Pattabiraman;Laurence J. Marton

  • Comparative genomic hybridization in patients with supratentorial and infratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

    Carolyn Russo;B S Malgorzata Pellarin;Ola Tingby;D.V.M. Andrew W. Bollen M.D.

  • Genetic aberrations defined by comparative genomic hybridization distinguish long-term from typical survivors of glioblastoma.

    Eric C. Burton;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Burt G. Feuerstein;Michael Prados

  • Effects of variation in the structure of spermine on the association with DNA and the induction of DNA conformational changes.

    H S Basu;H C A Schwietert;B G Feuerstein;L J Marton

  • Chromosomal Abnormalities Subdivide Ependymal Tumors into Clinically Relevant Groups

    Yuichi Hirose;Kenneth D Aldape;Andrew Bollen;C. David James

  • ERBB-2 (HER2/neu) Gene Copy Number, p185HER-2 Overexpression, and Intratumor Heterogeneity in Human Breast Cancer

    János Szöllösi;Margit Balázs;Burt G. Feuerstein;Christopher C. Benz

  • Losses of Chromosomal Arms 1p and 19q in the Diagnosis of Oligodendroglioma. A Study of Paraffin-Embedded Sections

    Peter C. Burger;A. Yuriko Minn;Justin S. Smith;Thomas J. Borell

  • Patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification in malignant gliomas.

    Guido Sauter;Tatsuhiro Maeda;Frederic M. Waldman;Richard L. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen R. Lamborn
Kathleen R. Lamborn University of California, San Francisco
János Szöllosi
János Szöllosi University of Debrecen
Kenneth Aldape
Kenneth Aldape National Institutes of Health
Daniel Pinkel
Daniel Pinkel University of California, San Francisco
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Mitchel S. Berger
Mitchel S. Berger University of California, San Francisco
Peter C. Burger
Peter C. Burger Johns Hopkins University
Robert F. Spetzler
Robert F. Spetzler St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse career opportunities—both in research and applied fields like healthcare and management. With the growing availability of online programs, students now have flexible options to advance their education and specialize in areas that align with their career goals.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing an online masters healthcare management degree can equip students for dynamic roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare settings. Alternatively, earning an mba healthcare management online is perfect for those seeking advanced business skills tailored to the medical sector.

Students aiming to combine biology with direct patient care might consider psych nurse practitioner programs, which prepare graduates to address mental health needs in clinical environments. Those passionate about nutrition science and public health will find that nutrition degree programs offer strong foundations for careers in wellness, dietetics, and research.

By exploring these online degree pathways, students in Biology and Biochemistry can boost their career prospects, gain advanced expertise, and contribute meaningfully to the rapidly evolving fields of health and life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Burt G. Feuerstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles