World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
107
Citations
63611
World Ranking
575
National Ranking
287

Molecular Biology

D-Index
107
Citations
63611
World Ranking
405
National Ranking
232

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
64065
World Ranking
6113
National Ranking
3271

Daniel Pinkel publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pinkel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 238 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Daniel Pinkel D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pinkel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Pinkel is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic profile does not list any recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work.

Information regarding the specific fields or subfields of study that Daniel Pinkel focuses on is not available. Similarly, there are no recorded main topics of research or work linked to this scientist.

There are no documented book publications or awards associated with Daniel Pinkel. The available data does not indicate any recognized distinctions or honors bestowed upon them.

The absence of detailed records about their research outputs or collaborations limits the ability to describe their contributions to scientific literature or their influence within particular academic communities.

Best Publications

  • Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors

    Anne Kallioniemi;Olli P. Kallioniemi;Damir Sudar;Denis Rutovitz

  • Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization.

    D Pinkel;T Straume;J W Gray

  • A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes

    Richard M. Neve;Richard M. Neve;Koei Chin;Jane Fridlyand;Jennifer Yeh

  • Distinct Sets of Genetic Alterations in Melanoma

    John A. Curtin;Jane Fridlyand;Toshiro Kageshita;Hetal N. Patel

  • High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays

    Daniel Pinkel;Daniel Pinkel;Richard Segraves;Damir Sudar;Steven Clark

  • Somatic Activation of KIT in Distinct Subtypes of Melanoma

    John A. Curtin;Klaus Busam;Daniel Pinkel;Boris C. Bastian

  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.

    D Pinkel;J Landegent;C Collins;J Fuscoe

  • Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies.

    Koei Chin;Sandy DeVries;Jane Fridlyand;Paul T. Spellman

  • PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer

    Laleh Shayesteh;Yiling Lu;Wen Lin Kuo;Russell Baldocchi

  • Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome.

    Eray Tuzun;Andrew J Sharp;Jeffrey A Bailey;Rajinder Kaul

  • Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number.

    Antoine M. Snijders;Norma Nowak;Richard Segraves;Stephanie Blackwood

  • Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.

    Olli‐P ‐P Kallioniemi;Anne Kallioniemi;Jim Piper;Jorma Isola

  • Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome

    Andrew J. Sharp;Devin P. Locke;Sean D. McGrath;Ze Cheng

  • The stromal proteinase MMP3/stromelysin-1 promotes mammary carcinogenesis.

    Mark D Sternlicht;Andre Lochter;Carolyn J Sympson;Bing Huey

  • Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.

    Anne Kallioniemi;Olli Pekka Kallioniemi;Jim Piper;Minna Tanner

  • Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer.

    Daniel Pinkel;Donna G Albertson

  • Determinants of BRAF Mutations in Primary Melanomas

    Janet L. Maldonado;Jane Fridlyand;Hetal Patel;Ajay N. Jain

  • A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome.

    Adrian S. Ishkanian;Chad A. Malloff;Spencer K. Watson;Ronald J. DeLeeuw

  • ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

    Olli-P. Kallioniemi;Anne Kallioniemi;Wayne Kurisu;Ann Thor

  • Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene.

    Donna G. Albertson;Bauke Ylstra;Richard Segraves;Colin Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Joe W. Gray
Joe W. Gray Oregon Health & Science University
Donna G. Albertson
Donna G. Albertson New York University
Colin Collins
Colin Collins University of British Columbia
Anne Kallioniemi
Anne Kallioniemi Tampere University
Boris C. Bastian
Boris C. Bastian University of California, San Francisco
Evan E. Eichler
Evan E. Eichler University of Washington
Philip E. LeBoit
Philip E. LeBoit University of California, San Francisco
Dan H. Moore
Dan H. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Katherine A. Rauen
Katherine A. Rauen University of California, Davis
Bauke Ylstra
Bauke Ylstra Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Molecular Biology can open the door to several complementary fields. Many students explore diverse pathways by studying related disciplines online, often at a lower cost or a flexible pace. For example, if you are interested in developing strong research skills, you might consider one of the cheapest online masters in history programs to gain a solid background in scientific research methods and analytical thinking.

Those with a fascination for scientific information and resources may find a library science degree rewarding, opening opportunities in academic libraries, research management, or curation of biotech data.

If you're drawn toward healthcare and communication, speech-language pathology is an in-demand field. Students can find asha approved slp programs online that are rigorous and flexible, often meeting industry standards quickly. For those coming from non-SLP backgrounds, an slp bridge program online can help you transition smoothly into this rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Pinkel