World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6112 5746 3270 3032 251 64065
Genetics 107 575 548 287 273 238 63611
Molecular Biology 107 405 370 231 206 238 63611

Daniel Pinkel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Pinkel between 1965 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Pinkel published across 60 years, from 1965 to 2024, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2003. 17 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2003. 1965: 2 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 1 publication
1965 2024

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Pinkel: publications per year, 1965 to 2024
Year Publications
1965 2
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 6
1987 3
1988 5
1989 6
1990 5
1991 10
1992 15
1993 5
1994 15
1995 11
1996 2
1997 10
1998 9
1999 9
2000 6
2001 10
2002 11
2003 25
2004 12
2005 23
2006 18
2007 9
2008 8
2009 0
2010 2
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 2
2015 0
2016 2
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 16
2024 1
Total 282
Download as CSV

Daniel Pinkel publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 238 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72 238
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Pinkel D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35 107
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel Pinkel is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic profile does not list any recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work.

Information regarding the specific fields or subfields of study that Daniel Pinkel focuses on is not available. Similarly, there are no recorded main topics of research or work linked to this scientist.

There are no documented book publications or awards associated with Daniel Pinkel. The available data does not indicate any recognized distinctions or honors bestowed upon them.

The absence of detailed records about their research outputs or collaborations limits the ability to describe their contributions to scientific literature or their influence within particular academic communities.

Best Publications

  • Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors

    Anne Kallioniemi;Olli P. Kallioniemi;Damir Sudar;Denis Rutovitz

  • Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization.

    D Pinkel;T Straume;J W Gray

  • A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes

    Richard M. Neve;Richard M. Neve;Koei Chin;Jane Fridlyand;Jennifer Yeh

  • Distinct Sets of Genetic Alterations in Melanoma

    John A. Curtin;Jane Fridlyand;Toshiro Kageshita;Hetal N. Patel

  • High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays

    Daniel Pinkel;Daniel Pinkel;Richard Segraves;Damir Sudar;Steven Clark

  • Somatic Activation of KIT in Distinct Subtypes of Melanoma

    John A. Curtin;Klaus Busam;Daniel Pinkel;Boris C. Bastian

  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.

    D Pinkel;J Landegent;C Collins;J Fuscoe

  • Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies.

    Koei Chin;Sandy DeVries;Jane Fridlyand;Paul T. Spellman

  • PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer

    Laleh Shayesteh;Yiling Lu;Wen Lin Kuo;Russell Baldocchi

  • Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome.

    Eray Tuzun;Andrew J Sharp;Jeffrey A Bailey;Rajinder Kaul

  • Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number.

    Antoine M. Snijders;Norma Nowak;Richard Segraves;Stephanie Blackwood

  • Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.

    Olli‐P ‐P Kallioniemi;Anne Kallioniemi;Jim Piper;Jorma Isola

  • Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome

    Andrew J. Sharp;Devin P. Locke;Sean D. McGrath;Ze Cheng

  • The stromal proteinase MMP3/stromelysin-1 promotes mammary carcinogenesis.

    Mark D Sternlicht;Andre Lochter;Carolyn J Sympson;Bing Huey

  • Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.

    Anne Kallioniemi;Olli Pekka Kallioniemi;Jim Piper;Minna Tanner

  • Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer.

    Daniel Pinkel;Donna G Albertson

  • Determinants of BRAF Mutations in Primary Melanomas

    Janet L. Maldonado;Jane Fridlyand;Hetal Patel;Ajay N. Jain

  • A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome.

    Adrian S. Ishkanian;Chad A. Malloff;Spencer K. Watson;Ronald J. DeLeeuw

  • ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

    Olli-P. Kallioniemi;Anne Kallioniemi;Wayne Kurisu;Ann Thor

  • Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene.

    Donna G. Albertson;Bauke Ylstra;Richard Segraves;Colin Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Joe W. Gray
Joe W. Gray Oregon Health & Science University
Donna G. Albertson
Donna G. Albertson New York University
Colin Collins
Colin Collins University of British Columbia
Anne Kallioniemi
Anne Kallioniemi Tampere University
Boris C. Bastian
Boris C. Bastian University of California, San Francisco
Evan E. Eichler
Evan E. Eichler University of Washington
Philip E. LeBoit
Philip E. LeBoit University of California, San Francisco
Dan H. Moore
Dan H. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Katherine A. Rauen
Katherine A. Rauen University of California, Davis
Bauke Ylstra
Bauke Ylstra Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Molecular Biology can open the door to several complementary fields. Many students explore diverse pathways by studying related disciplines online, often at a lower cost or a flexible pace. For example, if you are interested in developing strong research skills, you might consider one of the cheapest online masters in history programs to gain a solid background in scientific research methods and analytical thinking.

Those with a fascination for scientific information and resources may find a library science degree rewarding, opening opportunities in academic libraries, research management, or curation of biotech data.

If you're drawn toward healthcare and communication, speech-language pathology is an in-demand field. Students can find asha approved slp programs online that are rigorous and flexible, often meeting industry standards quickly. For those coming from non-SLP backgrounds, an slp bridge program online can help you transition smoothly into this rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Pinkel

Recently Published Articles