World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
162
Citations
105515
World Ranking
710
National Ranking
403

Mitchel S. Berger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchel S. Berger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,189 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mitchel S. Berger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchel S. Berger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 162 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mitchel S. Berger is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical science, with a particular emphasis on genetics, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, epidemiology, neurology, and molecular biology.

The main topics covered in Mitchel S. Berger's work include:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Recent publications authored by or involving Mitchel S. Berger are:

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group, 2022, Neuro-Oncology
  • Meningioma DNA methylation groups identify biological drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on diagnosis, management, and future directions, 2022, Neuro-Oncology
  • Evidence-based recommendations on categories for extent of resection in diffuse glioma, 2021, European Journal of Cancer

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Mitchel S. Berger include:

  • Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper (156 coauthored works)
  • Jacob S. Young (119 coauthored works)
  • Manish K. Aghi (66 coauthored works)
  • Joanna J. Phillips (63 coauthored works)
  • Ramin A. Morshed (61 coauthored works)

Mitchel S. Berger's work has been regularly published in key specialized venues such as:

  • Neuro-Oncology (104 publications)
  • Neurosurgery (32 publications)
  • Journal of Neurosurgery (24 publications)
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances (13 publications)
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology (13 publications)

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.

    Daniel J. Brat;Roel G.W. Verhaak;Kenneth D. Aldape;W. K.Alfred Yung

  • High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex.

    Ryan T. Canolty;Erik Edwards;Erik Edwards;Sarang Dalal;M. Soltani;M. Soltani

  • Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors

    Jeanette E Eckel-Passow;Daniel H Lachance;Annette M. Molinaro;Kyle M. Walsh

  • Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients.

    George Ojemann;Jeff Ojemann;E. Lettich;M. Berger

  • Unique astrocyte ribbon in adult human brain contains neural stem cells but lacks chain migration

    Nader Sanai;Anthony D Tramontin;Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa;Nicholas M Barbaro

  • An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

    Nader Sanai;Mei Yin Polley;Michael W. McDermott;Andrew T. Parsa

  • Tumor Evolution of Glioma-Intrinsic Gene Expression Subtypes Associates with Immunological Changes in the Microenvironment.

    Qianghu Wang;Baoli Hu;Xin Hu;Xin Hu;Hoon Kim

  • Role of Extent of Resection in the Long-Term Outcome of Low-Grade Hemispheric Gliomas

    Justin S. Smith;Edward F. Chang;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Susan M. Chang

  • Mutational Analysis Reveals the Origin and Therapy-Driven Evolution of Recurrent Glioma

    Brett E. Johnson;Tali Mazor;Chibo Hong;Michael Barnes

  • Impact of Intraoperative Stimulation Brain Mapping on Glioma Surgery Outcome: A Meta-Analysis

    Philip C. De Witt Hamer;Santiago Gil Robles;Aeilko H. Zwinderman;Hugues Duffau

  • Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: current concepts and review of the literature.

    Margaret Wrensch;Yuriko Minn;Terri Chew;Melissa Bondy

  • Corridors of migrating neurons in the human brain and their decline during infancy

    Nader Sanai;Thuhien Nguyen;Rebecca A. Ihrie;Zaman Mirzadeh;Zaman Mirzadeh

  • Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the Glioma Outcomes Project.

    Edward R. Laws Jr.;Ian F. Parney;Wei Huang;Frederick A. Anderson Jr.

  • The Genetic Landscape of the Childhood Cancer Medulloblastoma

    D. Williams Parsons;D. Williams Parsons;Meng Li;Xiaosong Zhang;Siân Jones

  • Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus

    Edward F Chang;Jochem W Rieger;Jochem W Rieger;Keith Johnson;Mitchel S Berger

  • Cellular composition and cytoarchitecture of the adult human subventricular zone: A niche of neural stem cells

    Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa;Nader Sanai;Mario Soriano-Navarro;Oscar Gonzalez-Perez

  • Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme

    Yu Liang;Maximilian Diehn;Nathan Watson;Andrew W. Bollen

  • Low-grade hemispheric gliomas in adults: a critical review of extent of resection as a factor influencing outcome.

    G E Keles;K R Lamborn;M S Berger

  • Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high grade glioma susceptibility

    Margaret Wrensch;Robert B. Jenkins;Jeffrey S. Chang;Ru Fang Yeh

Frequent Co-Authors

William T. Couldwell
William T. Couldwell University of Utah
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco
Michael W. McDermott
Michael W. McDermott University of California, San Francisco
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Joanna J. Phillips
Joanna J. Phillips University of California, San Francisco
Mark Bernstein
Mark Bernstein Toronto Western Hospital
Edward F. Chang
Edward F. Chang University of California, San Francisco
Andrew T. Parsa
Andrew T. Parsa Northwestern University
Tarik Tihan
Tarik Tihan University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to medical school; there are various online healthcare degrees that can fast-track your entry into the field. Many students are exploring affordable online programs to obtain quality education while minimizing student debt. For those interested in advanced nursing roles, the cheapest fnp programs can prepare you to become a Family Nurse Practitioner with the flexibility of online study.

If cost is a major concern, you can learn more about how much is online nursing school and discover budget-friendly options. Moving forward in your career, there are online nursing doctoral programs that offer opportunities for leadership, teaching, and research.

RNs who want to further their education quickly can benefit from cheap rn to bsn online programs, which help boost credentials and salary potential. Exploring these online pathways can open doors to a variety of roles within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchel S. Berger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles