World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5521 5294 147 141 160 9173

Harm Bartholomeus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Harm Bartholomeus between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Harm Bartholomeus published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 13 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2003 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Harm Bartholomeus: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 8
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 7
2012 7
2013 14
2014 16
2015 11
2016 10
2017 16
2018 11
2019 12
2020 1
2021 6
2022 11
2023 21
2024 7
2025 6
Total 183
Download as CSV

Harm Bartholomeus publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm Bartholomeus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 160
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Harm Bartholomeus D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm Bartholomeus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Harm Bartholomeus is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in environmental and agricultural sciences. Their work mainly spans the domains of environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with particular focus on remote sensing technologies and their applications in ecology and crop monitoring.

The scientist's publication record includes numerous papers in the fields of environmental engineering, ecology, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, and plant science. Their primary research topics involve remote sensing and LiDAR applications, remote sensing in agriculture, forest ecology and management, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Harm Bartholomeus are the following:

  • Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon (2020, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Non-destructive estimation of individual tree biomass: Allometric models, terrestrial and UAV laser scanning (2022, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Quantifying tropical forest structure through terrestrial and UAV laser scanning fusion in Australian rainforests (2022, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Impact assessment of soil salinity on crop production in Uzbekistan and its global significance (2022, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment)
  • Diurnal variation of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of agricultural crops observed from a point-based spectrometer on a UAV (2020, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation)

The most frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Wageningen University and Researchcenter Publications (Wageningen University & Research)
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Remote Sensing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Harm Bartholomeus has collaborated closely with a number of co-authors over multiple projects and papers, including:

  • Kim Calders
  • Benjamin Brede
  • Martin Herold
  • Lammert Kooistra
  • Shaun R. Levick

In addition to journal articles, the scientist has published a book titled Aboveground Woody Biomass Product Validation Good Practices Protocol (2021) through Ghent University, contributing to the methodology and standards in biomass estimation.

Best Publications

  • A global spectral library to characterize the world’s soil

    R.A. Viscarra Rossel;T. Behrens;E. Ben-Dor;D.J. Brown

  • Global mapping of soil salinity change

    Konstantin Ivushkin;Harm Bartholomeus;Arnold K. Bregt;Alim Pulatov

  • Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon

    Kim Calders;Jennifer Adams;John Armston;Harm Bartholomeus

  • Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots

    Phil Wilkes;Alvaro Lau;Mathias Disney;Kim Calders;Kim Calders

  • Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning

    Sébastien Bauwens;Harm Bartholomeus;Kim Calders;Philippe Lejeune

  • Laboratory, field and airborne spectroscopy for monitoring organic carbon content in agricultural soils

    Antoine Stevens;Bas van Wesemael;Harm Bartholomeus;Damien Rosillon

  • Estimation of above-ground biomass of large tropical trees with Terrestrial LiDAR

    Jose Gonzalez de Tanago;Jose Gonzalez de Tanago;Alvaro Lau;Alvaro Lau;Harm Bartholomeus;Martin Herold

  • Spectral reflectance based indices for soil organic carbon quantification

    H. M. Bartholomeus;M. E. Schaepman;L. Kooistra;Antoine Stevens

  • Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR.

    Benjamin Brede;Alvaro Lau;Alvaro Lau;Harm M. Bartholomeus;Lammert Kooistra

  • Predicting soil microplastic concentration using vis-NIR spectroscopy

    Fabio Corradini;Harm Bartholomeus;Esperanza Huerta Lwanga;Hennie Gertsen

  • Improved estimation of leaf area index and leaf chlorophyll content of a potato crop using multi-angle spectral data – potential of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery

    Peter P.J. Roosjen;Benjamin Brede;Juha M. Suomalainen;Juha M. Suomalainen;Harm M. Bartholomeus

  • The response of Arctic vegetation to the summer climate: relation between shrub cover, NDVI, surface albedo and temperature

    Daan Blok;Gabriela Schaepman-Strub;Harm Bartholomeus;Monique M P D Heijmans

  • Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: Comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR

    Benjamin Brede;Kim Calders;Alvaro Lau;Pasi Raumonen

  • A Lightweight Hyperspectral Mapping System and Photogrammetric Processing Chain for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    Juha Suomalainen;Niels S. Anders;Shahzad Iqbal;Gerbert Roerink

  • Biomass and Crop Height Estimation of Different Crops Using UAV-Based Lidar

    Jelle ten Harkel;Harm M. Bartholomeus;Lammert Kooistra

  • Soil Organic Carbon mapping of partially vegetated agricultural fields with imaging spectroscopy

    Harm M. Bartholomeus;Lammert Kooistra;Antoine Stevens;Martin van Leeuwen

  • Non-destructive estimation of individual tree biomass: Allometric models, terrestrial and UAV laser scanning

    Unknown

  • Quantifying branch architecture of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling

    Alvaro Lau;Alvaro Lau;Lisa Patrick Bentley;Christopher Martius;Alexander Shenkin

  • UAV based soil salinity assessment of cropland

    Konstantin Ivushkin;Harm Bartholomeus;Arnold K. Bregt;Alim Pulatov

  • Quantifying tropical forest structure through terrestrial and UAV laser scanning fusion in Australian rainforests

    Unknown

  • A satellite based crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling in sugarcane fields

    Shadman Veysi;Abd Ali Naseri;Saeid Hamzeh;Harm Bartholomeus

  • Laboratory, field and airborne spectroscopy for monitoring organic carbon content in agricultural soils

    Antoine Stevens;Bas van Wesemael;Harm Bartholomeus

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Herold
Martin Herold Wageningen University & Research
Kim Calders
Kim Calders Ghent University
Lammert Kooistra
Lammert Kooistra Wageningen University & Research
Juha Suomalainen
Juha Suomalainen Wageningen University & Research
Jan G. P. W. Clevers
Jan G. P. W. Clevers Wageningen University & Research
Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Mathias Disney
Mathias Disney University College London
Christopher Martius
Christopher Martius Center for International Forestry Research, Germany
Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
Gabriela Schaepman-Strub University of Zurich
Arnold K. Bregt
Arnold K. Bregt Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career opportunities. For those interested in advanced social aspects of environmental work, affordable options like dsw programs offer specialized training in social work that can complement environmental efforts.

If you're seeking a broader academic foundation, consider pursuing a low cost online general studies degree. This flexible option can provide essential skills while allowing for customized focus areas related to environmental topics.

For students balancing commitments or looking to enter the workforce quickly, exploring some of the easy bachelor degrees could be a strategic choice. These programs often emphasize practical knowledge, making them effective stepping stones into environmental careers.

Specialists aiming to work directly with earth sciences should consider accredited online options such as a geologist degree online. This pathway equips students with critical skills to study the Earth's processes and support sustainable environmental management.

Best Scientists Citing Harm Bartholomeus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles