World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Cécile Gomez publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Gomez sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Cécile Gomez D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Gomez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cécile Gomez is affiliated with the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement in France. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and computer science, with significant contributions spanning several subfields including environmental engineering, artificial intelligence, soil science, ecology, and mechanical engineering.

Their work covers a variety of topics, notably soil geostatistics and mapping, geochemistry and geologic mapping, remote sensing in agriculture, mineral processing and grinding, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil erosion and sediment transport, and spectroscopy and chemometric analyses.

Prominent publication venues for Cécile Gomez include Geoderma with eight publications, Remote Sensing with seven, Geoderma Regional with three, The Science of The Total Environment with two, and The Innovation with two.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gomez are S. Dharumarajan, Dominique Arrouays, Budiman Minasny, Sabine Chabrillat, and José Alexandre Melo Demattê, indicating a collaborative approach in their research work across multiple fields and studies.

Representative recent papers by Cécile Gomez include:

  • Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil properties: A technology for the 21st century, 2022, European Journal of Soil Science
  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands, 2020, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Analysing the impact of soil spatial sampling on the performances of Digital Soil Mapping models and their evaluation: A numerical experiment on Quantile Random Forest using clay contents obtained from Vis-NIR-SWIR hyperspectral imagery, 2020, Geoderma
  • Using PRISMA Hyperspectral Satellite Imagery and GIS Approaches for Soil Fertility Mapping (FertiMap) in Northern Morocco, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Mean spectral reflectance from bare soil pixels along a Landsat-TM time series to increase both the prediction accuracy of soil clay content and mapping coverage, 2021, Geoderma

Best Publications

  • Global Mineralogical and Aqueous Mars History Derived from OMEGA/Mars Express Data

    Jean-Pierre Bibring;Yves Langevin;John F. Mustard;François Poulet

  • Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for early martian climate

    F. Poulet;J.-P. Bibring;J. F. Mustard;A. Gendrin

  • A global spectral library to characterize the world’s soil

    R.A. Viscarra Rossel;T. Behrens;E. Ben-Dor;D.J. Brown

  • Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: An Australian case study

    Cécile Gomez;Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel;Alex B. McBratney

  • Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years

    Jingfeng Xiao;Frederic Chevallier;Cecile Gomez;Luis Guanter

  • Continuum removal versus PLSR method for clay and calcium carbonate content estimation from laboratory and airborne hyperspectral measurements

    Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Guillaume Coulouma

  • Assessment and monitoring of soil quality using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)

    L. Cecillon;Bernard Barthès;Cécile Gomez;D. Ertlen

  • Martian surface mineralogy from Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l'Eau, les Glaces et l'Activité on board the Mars Express spacecraft (OMEGA/MEx): Global mineral maps

    F. Poulet;C. Gomez;J.-P. Bibring;Y. Langevin

  • Phyllosilicates in the Mawrth Vallis region of Mars

    D. Loizeau;N. Mangold;F. Poulet;J.-P. Bibring

  • Imaging Spectroscopy for Soil Mapping and Monitoring

    S. Chabrillat;E. Ben-Dor;J. Cierniewski;C. Gomez

  • Sentinel-2 image capacities to predict common topsoil properties of temperate and Mediterranean agroecosystems

    E. Vaudour;C. Gomez;Y. Fouad;P. Lagacherie

  • Regional predictions of eight common soil properties and their spatial structures from hyperspectral Vis–NIR data

    Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Guillaume Coulouma

  • Using ASTER remote sensing data set for geological mapping, in Namibia

    Cécile Gomez;Christophe Delacourt;Pascal Allemand;Patrick Ledru

  • Which strategy is best to predict soil properties of a local site from a national Vis–NIR database?

    Fabien Gogé;Cécile Gomez;Claudy Jolivet;Richard Joffre

  • Satellite data integration for soil clay content modelling at a national scale

    T. Loiseau;S. Chen;S. Chen;V.L. Mulder;M. Román Dobarco

  • Predictive ability of soil properties to spectral degradation from laboratory Vis-NIR spectroscopy data

    Karine R.M. Adeline;Cecile Gomez;N. Gorretta;J.M. Roger

  • Mineralogy of Terra Meridiani and western Arabia Terra from OMEGA/MEx and implications for their formation

    F. Poulet;R.E. Arvidson;C. Gomez;R.V. Morris

  • Hydration state of the Martian surface as seen by Mars Express OMEGA: 1. Analysis of the 3 μm hydration feature

    D. Jouglet;F. Poulet;R. E. Milliken;J. F. Mustard

  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands

    Emmanuelle Vaudour;Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Thomas Loiseau

  • Sensitivity of clay content prediction to spectral configuration of VNIR/SWIR imaging data, from multispectral to hyperspectral scenarios

    Cécile Gomez;Karine R.M. Adeline;Sinan Bacha;Bart Driessen

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Lagacherie
Philippe Lagacherie University of Montpellier
Yves Langevin
Yves Langevin University of Paris-Saclay
Dominique Arrouays
Dominique Arrouays INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-Pierre Bibring
Jean-Pierre Bibring University of Paris-Saclay
François Poulet
François Poulet University of Paris-Saclay
John F. Mustard
John F. Mustard Brown University
Brigitte Gondet
Brigitte Gondet University of Paris-Saclay
Pascal Allemand
Pascal Allemand École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Christophe Delacourt
Christophe Delacourt University of Western Brittany
Nicolas P.A. Saby
Nicolas P.A. Saby INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career pathways. Many students and professionals consider complementing their studies with degrees that enhance their language skills or leadership abilities. For example, military friendly online spanish degree programs offer veterans an accessible way to expand their communication skills, which can be valuable in international environmental projects and research collaborations.

Creative approaches to Earth Science also benefit from understanding diverse perspectives. Those interested in integrating art and science might explore an mfa degree online to develop visual storytelling skills that promote environmental awareness.

For those aiming to move into management roles within natural resource organizations or environmental agencies, pursuing the best online master degree in human resource management can provide critical leadership and organizational skills.

Additionally, Earth Science appeals to lifelong learners of all ages. Accessible options like degrees for seniors ensure that people can continue their education and contribute to scientific advancements regardless of age.

Best Scientists Citing Cécile Gomez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles