World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 35 7436 6886 582 555 71 9001

Cécile Gomez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cécile Gomez between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cécile Gomez published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2022. 15 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2022. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
2004 2025

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cécile Gomez: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 6
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 9
2015 5
2016 8
2017 11
2018 6
2019 11
2020 5
2021 8
2022 15
2023 5
2024 7
2025 8
Total 128
Download as CSV

Cécile Gomez publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Gomez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 68–77 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 71 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161 71
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Cécile Gomez D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Gomez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372 35
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cécile Gomez is affiliated with the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement in France. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and computer science, with significant contributions spanning several subfields including environmental engineering, artificial intelligence, soil science, ecology, and mechanical engineering.

Their work covers a variety of topics, notably soil geostatistics and mapping, geochemistry and geologic mapping, remote sensing in agriculture, mineral processing and grinding, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil erosion and sediment transport, and spectroscopy and chemometric analyses.

Prominent publication venues for Cécile Gomez include Geoderma with eight publications, Remote Sensing with seven, Geoderma Regional with three, The Science of The Total Environment with two, and The Innovation with two.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gomez are S. Dharumarajan, Dominique Arrouays, Budiman Minasny, Sabine Chabrillat, and José Alexandre Melo Demattê, indicating a collaborative approach in their research work across multiple fields and studies.

Representative recent papers by Cécile Gomez include:

  • Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil properties: A technology for the 21st century, 2022, European Journal of Soil Science
  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands, 2020, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Analysing the impact of soil spatial sampling on the performances of Digital Soil Mapping models and their evaluation: A numerical experiment on Quantile Random Forest using clay contents obtained from Vis-NIR-SWIR hyperspectral imagery, 2020, Geoderma
  • Using PRISMA Hyperspectral Satellite Imagery and GIS Approaches for Soil Fertility Mapping (FertiMap) in Northern Morocco, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Mean spectral reflectance from bare soil pixels along a Landsat-TM time series to increase both the prediction accuracy of soil clay content and mapping coverage, 2021, Geoderma

Best Publications

  • Global Mineralogical and Aqueous Mars History Derived from OMEGA/Mars Express Data

    Jean-Pierre Bibring;Yves Langevin;John F. Mustard;François Poulet

  • Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for early martian climate

    F. Poulet;J.-P. Bibring;J. F. Mustard;A. Gendrin

  • A global spectral library to characterize the world’s soil

    R.A. Viscarra Rossel;T. Behrens;E. Ben-Dor;D.J. Brown

  • Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: An Australian case study

    Cécile Gomez;Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel;Alex B. McBratney

  • Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years

    Jingfeng Xiao;Frederic Chevallier;Cecile Gomez;Luis Guanter

  • Continuum removal versus PLSR method for clay and calcium carbonate content estimation from laboratory and airborne hyperspectral measurements

    Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Guillaume Coulouma

  • Assessment and monitoring of soil quality using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)

    L. Cecillon;Bernard Barthès;Cécile Gomez;D. Ertlen

  • Martian surface mineralogy from Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l'Eau, les Glaces et l'Activité on board the Mars Express spacecraft (OMEGA/MEx): Global mineral maps

    F. Poulet;C. Gomez;J.-P. Bibring;Y. Langevin

  • Phyllosilicates in the Mawrth Vallis region of Mars

    D. Loizeau;N. Mangold;F. Poulet;J.-P. Bibring

  • Imaging Spectroscopy for Soil Mapping and Monitoring

    S. Chabrillat;E. Ben-Dor;J. Cierniewski;C. Gomez

  • Sentinel-2 image capacities to predict common topsoil properties of temperate and Mediterranean agroecosystems

    E. Vaudour;C. Gomez;Y. Fouad;P. Lagacherie

  • Regional predictions of eight common soil properties and their spatial structures from hyperspectral Vis–NIR data

    Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Guillaume Coulouma

  • Using ASTER remote sensing data set for geological mapping, in Namibia

    Cécile Gomez;Christophe Delacourt;Pascal Allemand;Patrick Ledru

  • Which strategy is best to predict soil properties of a local site from a national Vis–NIR database?

    Fabien Gogé;Cécile Gomez;Claudy Jolivet;Richard Joffre

  • Satellite data integration for soil clay content modelling at a national scale

    T. Loiseau;S. Chen;S. Chen;V.L. Mulder;M. Román Dobarco

  • Predictive ability of soil properties to spectral degradation from laboratory Vis-NIR spectroscopy data

    Karine R.M. Adeline;Cecile Gomez;N. Gorretta;J.M. Roger

  • Mineralogy of Terra Meridiani and western Arabia Terra from OMEGA/MEx and implications for their formation

    F. Poulet;R.E. Arvidson;C. Gomez;R.V. Morris

  • Hydration state of the Martian surface as seen by Mars Express OMEGA: 1. Analysis of the 3 μm hydration feature

    D. Jouglet;F. Poulet;R. E. Milliken;J. F. Mustard

  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands

    Emmanuelle Vaudour;Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Thomas Loiseau

  • Sensitivity of clay content prediction to spectral configuration of VNIR/SWIR imaging data, from multispectral to hyperspectral scenarios

    Cécile Gomez;Karine R.M. Adeline;Sinan Bacha;Bart Driessen

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Lagacherie
Philippe Lagacherie University of Montpellier
Yves Langevin
Yves Langevin University of Paris-Saclay
Dominique Arrouays
Dominique Arrouays INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-Pierre Bibring
Jean-Pierre Bibring University of Paris-Saclay
François Poulet
François Poulet University of Paris-Saclay
John F. Mustard
John F. Mustard Brown University
Brigitte Gondet
Brigitte Gondet University of Paris-Saclay
Pascal Allemand
Pascal Allemand École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Christophe Delacourt
Christophe Delacourt University of Western Brittany
Nicolas P.A. Saby
Nicolas P.A. Saby INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career pathways. Many students and professionals consider complementing their studies with degrees that enhance their language skills or leadership abilities. For example, military friendly online spanish degree programs offer veterans an accessible way to expand their communication skills, which can be valuable in international environmental projects and research collaborations.

Creative approaches to Earth Science also benefit from understanding diverse perspectives. Those interested in integrating art and science might explore an mfa degree online to develop visual storytelling skills that promote environmental awareness.

For those aiming to move into management roles within natural resource organizations or environmental agencies, pursuing the best online master degree in human resource management can provide critical leadership and organizational skills.

Additionally, Earth Science appeals to lifelong learners of all ages. Accessible options like degrees for seniors ensure that people can continue their education and contribute to scientific advancements regardless of age.

Best Scientists Citing Cécile Gomez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles