World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 49 5794 5628 25 25 224 12724

Jesper Tegnér publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jesper Tegnér between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jesper Tegnér published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2018. 21 of the 377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2018. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 2 publications
1992 2026

377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jesper Tegnér: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 5
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 8
2004 2
2005 4
2006 11
2007 13
2008 7
2009 17
2010 5
2011 9
2012 2
2013 16
2014 20
2015 17
2016 26
2017 20
2018 32
2019 24
2020 22
2021 19
2022 10
2023 29
2024 20
2025 19
2026 2
Total 377
Download as CSV

Jesper Tegnér publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Tegnér sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 222–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 224 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437 224
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jesper Tegnér D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Tegnér sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 49
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jesper Tegnér is affiliated with the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology.

Their work spans several subfields of study including Immunology, Artificial Intelligence, Biophysics, and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Key research topics that Jesper Tegnér has contributed to are:

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis

Jesper Tegnér has authored numerous papers, with some recent notable publications being:

  • "Harmonization of quality metrics and power calculation in multi-omic studies," published in 2020 in Nature Communications
  • "DeepViral: prediction of novel virus-host interactions from protein sequences and infectious disease phenotypes," published in 2021 in Bioinformatics
  • "Deriving disease modules from the compressed transcriptional space embedded in a deep autoencoder," published in 2020 in Nature Communications
  • "A robust machine learning framework to identify signatures for frailty: a nested case-control study in four aging European cohorts," published in 2021 in GeroScience
  • "STATegra: Multi-Omics Data Integration - A Conceptual Scheme With a Bioinformatics Pipeline," published in 2021 in Frontiers in Genetics

Frequent collaborators include David Gómez-Cabrero, Narsis A. Kiani, Vincenzo Lagani, Robert Lehmann, and Felipe Prósper. Their publications appear often in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Blood, Nature Machine Intelligence, and the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Jesper Tegnér's academic contributions also extend to book publications, including a work titled Algorithmic Information Dynamics published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.

Best Publications

  • A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data

    Andrew E. Teschendorff;Francesco Marabita;Matthias Lechner;Thomas Bartlett

  • An Atlas of Combinatorial Transcriptional Regulation in Mouse and Man

    Timothy Ravasi;Harukazu Suzuki;Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci;Shintaro Katayama

  • Reverse engineering gene networks using singular value decomposition and robust regression

    M. K. S. Yeung;J. Tegner;J. J. Collins

  • Reverse engineering gene networks: Integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling

    Jesper Tegnér;M. K. Stephen Yeung;Jeff Hasty;James J. Collins

  • The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line

    Harukazu Suzuki;Alistair R.R. Forrest;Erik Van Nimwegen;Carsten O. Daub

  • Data integration in the era of omics: current and future challenges.

    David Gomez-Cabrero;Imad Abugessaisa;Dieter Maier;Andrew E. Teschendorff

  • Division of labor among distinct subtypes of inhibitory neurons in a cortical microcircuit of working memory

    X.-J. Wang;Jesper Tegnér;Jesper Tegnér;C. Constantinidis;C. Constantinidis;P.S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity

    Fredrik Edin;Torkel Klingberg;Pär Johansson;Fiona McNab

  • Intrinsic function of a neuronal network - a vertebrate central pattern generator.

    Sten Grillner;Örjan Ekeberg;Abdeljabbar El Manira;Anders Lansner

  • An integrative analysis reveals coordinated reprogramming of the epigenome and the transcriptome in human skeletal muscle after training

    Maléne E Lindholm;Francesco Marabita;David Gomez-Cabrero;Helene Rundqvist

  • Normalization of circulating microRNA expression data obtained by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

    Francesco Marabita;Paola de Candia;Anna Torri;Jesper Tegnér

  • Towards scalable and data efficient learning of Markov boundaries

    Jose M. Peòa;Roland Nilsson;Johan Björkegren;Jesper Tegnér

  • An evaluation of analysis pipelines for DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform.

    Francesco Marabita;Malin Almgren;Maléne E. Lindholm;Sabrina Ruhrmann

  • Consistent Feature Selection for Pattern Recognition in Polynomial Time

    Roland Nilsson;José M. Peña;Johan Björkegren;Jesper Tegnér

  • Calcium-dependent potassium channels play a critical role for burst termination in the locomotor network in lamprey.

    A. el Manira;J. Tegner;S. Grillner

  • The dynamical stability of reverberatory neural circuits.

    Jesper Tegnér;Albert Compte;Xiao Jing Wang

  • A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human in 2010 and beyond.

    Peter Hunter;Peter Hunter;Peter V. Coveney;Bernard de Bono;Vanessa Diaz

  • Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: common themes and divergent vistas.

    Adam Kepecs;Mark C.W. van Rossum;Sen Song;Jesper Tegner

  • Transcriptional network dynamics in macrophage activation.

    Roland Nilsson;Vladimir B. Bajic;Vladimir B. Bajic;Harukazu Suzuki;Diego di Bernardo

  • A Decomposition Method for Global Evaluation of Shannon Entropy and Local Estimations of Algorithmic Complexity

    Hector Zenil;Hector Zenil;Santiago Hernández-Orozco;Santiago Hernández-Orozco;Narsis Aftab Kiani;Fernando Soler-Toscano

  • Towards scalable and data efficient learning of Markov boundaries

    Jose M. Pena;Roland Nilsson;Johan Björkegren;Jesper Tegner

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways that cater to different interests and goals. For those looking to start quickly, easy associate degrees in technology or IT can offer a fast track into the tech industry, providing foundational skills and entry-level opportunities.

Students interested in academic advancement or leadership roles may consider online educational leadership programs. These programs are especially helpful for those wishing to guide educational technology initiatives or train future tech talent.

Choosing the right school is essential. Finding one of the best online colleges ensures your degree is respected and your education is high-quality, flexible, and supportive of your career aspirations.

For those passionate about entertainment technology, pursuing a game design online masters can lead to creative careers in the booming gaming industry. No matter your career goals, online degree options in computer science and related fields are more accessible, affordable, and flexible than ever before.

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles